Socio-Psychological Research of Russian Business Leaders’ Value Preferences

The article presents the results of a study of leaders’ value orientations. This study is the first stage of scientific research, which aims to assess the leadership potential of Russian entrepreneurship and draw conclusions about the personnel readiness of Russian business for the transition to a digital society. The mechanism for assessing leadership potential is established on a situational-role leadership model based on Kurt Levin’s field theory. During interviews with entrepreneurs and top managers of large companies, four basic situations in the business environment were identified, which correspond to four fundamental leadership styles. For each leadership style, hypotheses were formulated regarding the set of value orientations characteristic of a given leadership style. An empirical study of the value preferences of representatives of Russian business was carried out in 2018. A total of 117 respondents took part in the study. The survey was conducted online using the Google Forms service. The data collected was subjected to correlation analysis (Pearson method) and hierarchical cluster analysis (Ward method). In general, the results of the study confirmed hypotheses about the existence of stable correlations of basic value orientations that determine the profiles of distinguished leadership styles. The number of some identified parameter groups is small (in particular, the number of the group that has common characteristics of the innovative leadership style profile is 5 people, comprising 4% of the number of respondents), which may indicate an insufficiently accurate determination of the set of value orientations that describe this particular leadership style and the imbalance of the questionnaire itself, as well as the absence among respondents of the business elite of respondents who adhere to this leadership style. In the future, we plan to expand the research sample by conducting surveys of leaders in the NGO and social business segments, as well as conducting the second stage of the study, which includes comprehensive testing to determine the leadership style and selective in-depth interviews with respondents in order to verify the correlation between the identified leadership style and environment in which they carry out their activities.

1. McGregor D. The human side of enterpise. USA, McGraw-Hill Education Publ., 2006, pp. 243–259.
2. Levin К. Field theory in the social science. St. Petersburg, Sensor Publ., 2000. (In Russian)
3. Blake R., Mouton J., Rejoinder A. Comments on The Productivity Battle: A Behavioral Science Analysis of Japan and the United States. The journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1986, no. 20 (1), pp. 49–56.
4. Mishel W. From Personality and Assessment (1968) to Personality Science, 2009. Journal of Research on Personality, 2009, vol. 43 (2), pp. 282–290. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0092656609000178 (accessed: 09.10.2018).
5. Fiedler F. A Theory of Leadership. New York, McGraw-Hill Publ., 1967, pp. 149–212.
6. Belbin М.R. Management teams. How to explain their success. Мoscow, МIF Publ., 2009, pp. 83– 136. (In Russian)
7. Minzberg G., Quinn D., Goshal С. Strategicheskii protsess. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ, 2001, pp. 41– 66. (In Russian)
8. Adizes I. The ideal manager. Why is it impossible to became him and what is arising from that. Moscow, Stins Coman Publ., 2008, pp. 44–59. (In Russian)
9. Merlin V.С. Collected works. Volume 2. The peculiarity of conditioned reactions in the structure of volitional act. Perm’, PSI Publ., 2006. (In Russian)
10. Lalu F., Apper E. Opening future organizations. Illustrated trip to the organizationas of new type. Мoscow, MIF Publ., 2017, pp. 43–81. (In Russian)
11. Senge P. The Fifth Discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. USA, Currency Publ., 1990, pp. 139–232.
12. Daft R. The leadership lesson. Мoscow, ECSMO Publ., 2007, pp. 429–432. (In Russian)
13. Hannah S.T., Eggers J.T., Jennings P.L. Complex adaptive leadership — defining what constitutes effective leadership for complex organizational contexts. Knowledge-driven Corporation: Complex Creative Destruction. Eds G.B.Graen, J.A.Graen. North Carolina, LMX Leadership Publ., 2008, pp. 79–124.
14. Avolio B.J., Hannah, S.T. Developmental readiness: Accelerating leader development. Consulting Psychology. Journal: Practice and Research, 2008, no. 4, pp. 331–347.
15. Ford R. Complex leadership competency in health care: Towards framing a theory of practice. Health Services Management Research, 2009, no. 22 (3), pp. 101–114.
16. Chadwick M. Creating Order out of Chaos: A Leadership Approach. AORN Journal, 2010, no. 91 (1), pp. 154–170.
17. Obolensky N. Complex Adaptive Leadership — Embracing Paradox and Uncertainty. USA, Gower Publishing Company Publ., 2010, pp. 69–123.
18. Vazlavic P., Bivin D., Jackson D. The pragmatics of human communications. Moscow, Aprel-Press Publ., Ecsmo-Press Publ., 2000, pp. 119–130. (In Russian)
19. Nardone G. Art of quick changes: short-term quick therapy. Мoscow, Institute Psychoterapii Publ., 2006, pp. 11–66. (In Russian)
20. Brabander L. The Forgotten Half of Change: Achieving Greater Creativity through Changes. Moscow, Pretext Publ., 2008, pp. 17–36. (In Russian)
21. Aksenovskaja L., Bazarov T.Organizational culture management. Rossiiskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2008, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 9–13. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/upravlenie-organizatsionnoy-kulturoy-1 (accessed: 03.07.2019). (In Russian)
22. Grishina N.V. Psychology of social situations. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2001, pp. 8–26. (In Russian)
23. Аndreeva G.M. Social Psychology. Мoscow, Moscow State University Publ., 1988, pp. 303–308. (In Russian)
24. Ulrich D., Kryscynsky D., Ulrich M. Wayne Brockbank. Leaders as paradox navigators. Wiley online library, 2017. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ltl.20322 (accessed: 21.02.19).
25. Johnson B. Polarity management: how to solve unsolving problems. Мoscow, Mann, Ivanov and Ferber Publ., 2018, pp. 37–48.
26. Cameron К., Quinn R. Diagnostics and changing organizational culture. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2001, pp. 110–232.