The Relationship Between Proactive Coping with Difficult Life Situations and the Level of Mindfulness: a Cross-Cultural Analysis

The modern understanding of the processes of coping with difficult life situations, emphasizing the provision of subjective well-being as their function, raises the question of what factors ensure the final effectiveness of coping strategies. The inconsistency of the available empirical data on the relationship between personal and situational predictors as well as effective coping allows us to assume the presence of mediating variables. Their search can be centered both on the inclusion of parameters of a higher socio-cognitive level in the analysis, and on the procedural characteristics of coping, one of which is proactivity in coping. The mindfulness construct seems to meet both of these requirements. The article presents the results of the preliminary and main stages of an empirical study of the relationship between mindful- ness and proactive coping strategies. During the preliminary stage, the questionnaire “scale of awareness” was adapted to correspond to the “Western” model of awareness. During the main stage, the results of the relationship of mindfulness indicators according to the “Eastern” and “Western” models with proactivity strategies in two samples (Moscow — Tashkent) were obtained, which allowed us to identify certain cultural differences. The results indicate that there are partial correlations between the indicators of the two mindfulness questionnaires, which is consistent with existing theoretical concepts and allows us to consider the two mod- els of mindfulness as stages of a single process. It is shown that in both samples, indicators of “Western” awareness are associated with the attitude to potential difficulties as a source of positive experience and with reflection in the event of the occurrence of possible variants of behavior, cognitive assessment of one’s own resources and prediction of results, as well as with a proactivity strategy such as the search for instrumental support. Cross-cultural differences were noted on a scale corresponding to “Eastern” awareness: in the sample of Tashkent, it was associated with a strategy of proactive coping, and in the sample of Moscow — with reflexive coping. The obtained relationship between the two types of mindfulness and proactive coping strategies allows us to conclude that mindfulness has the potential of meta-cognitive function in the structure of human activity, especially in the situation of evaluating possible life difficulties.

1. Frydenberg E. Coping research: Historical background, links with emotion, and new research directions on adaptive processes. Australian Journal of Psychology, 2014, vol. 66, pp. 82–92.
2. Folkman S. Personal control, stress, and coping processes: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984, no. 46, pp. 839–852.
3. Folkman S., Lazarus R. S. The relationship between coping and emotion: Implications for theory and research. Social Science Medicine, 1988, no. 26, pp. 309–317.
4. Lasarus R. Emotions and interpersonal relationships: toward a person-centered conceptualization of emotions and coping. Journal of Personality, 2006, vol. 74 (1), pp. 9–43.
5. Carver C. S., Connor-Smith J. Personality and coping. Annual Review of Psychology, 2010, no. 61, pp. 679–704.
6. Lvova E. N., Mitina O. V., Shlyagina E. I. Personal predictors of coping behavior in a situation of uncertainty. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia, 2015, vol. 8, no. 40. Available at: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/ num/2015v8n40/1112-lvova40 (assessed: 03.02.2021). (In Russian)
7. Khachaturova M. R. Coping repertoire of personality: review of foreign research. Psychology. Psikhologiia. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2013, vol. 10 (3), pp. 160–169. (In Russian)
8. Brissette I., Scheier M. F., Carver C. S. The role of optimism and social network development, coping and psychological adjustment during a life transition. Journal of personality and social psychology, 2002, no. 82, pp. 102–111.
9. Bityutskaya E. V. Types of orientations in difficult situations. Voprosy psikhologii, 2018, no. 5, pp. 41–53. (In Russian)
10. Belinskaya E. P., Agadullina E. R. Experience of relative deprivation as a factor of coping strategy of avoidance in network communication. Sotsial’naia psikhologiia i obshchestvo, 2020, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 92–106. (In Russian)
11. Greenglass E. R. Proactive coping. Beyond coping: Meeting goals, vision, and challenges. Ed. by E. Frydenberg. London: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 37–62.
12. Greenglass E. R., Fiksenbaum L. Proactive coping, positive affect, and well-being: Testing for mediation using path analysis considerations. European Psychologist, 2009, vol. 14, pp. 29–39.
13. Brissette I., Scheier M. F., Carver C. S. The role of optimism and social network development, coping and psychological adjustment during a life transition. Journal of personality and social psychology, 2002, no. 82, pp. 102–111.
14. Bandura A. Self-Efficacy Theory. The Exercise of Control. New York, 2000.
15. Bogdan C., Rioux L., Negovan V. Place attachment, proactive coping and well-being in university environment. Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, no. 33, pp. 865–869.
16. Sibinga E. M., Kerrigan D., Stewart M., Johnson K., Magyari T., Ellen J. M. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for urban youth. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 2011, no. 17 (3), pp. 213–218.
17. Keng Sh., Choo X., Tong E. Association between Trait Mindfulness and Variability of Coping Strategies: A Diary Study. New York, Springer, 2018.
18. Keng Sh., Tong E. M. Riding the Tide of Emotions with Mindfulness: Mindfulness, Affect Dynamics, and the Mediating Role of Coping. Emotion, 2016, vol. 16, pp. 243–256.
19. Weinstein N., Brown K. W., Ryan R. M. A multi-method examination of the effects of mindfulness on stress attribution, coping, and emotional well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 2009, vol. 43, pp. 374–385.
20. Starchenkova E. S. The Concept of proactive coping. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Psikhologiia, 2009, vol. 12, pp. 198–205. (In Russian)
21. Crum A., Lyddy C. De-Stressing Stress: The Power of Mindsets and the Art of Stressing Mindfully. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Mindfulness, eds A. Ie, C. T. Ngnoumen, E. J. Langer. Chichester, West Sussex, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2014.
22. Langer E. Mindfulness. Boston, Harvard Business Review, 2017. Rus. ed.: Moscow, E Publ., 2017. (In Russian)
23. Yumartova N. M., Grishina N. V. Mindfulness: psychological characteristics and adaptation of measurement tools. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2016, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 105–115. (In Russian)
24. Langer E. J, Moldoveanu M. The construct of mindfulness. Journal of social issues, 2000, vol. 56, pp. 1–9.
25. Osin E. N., Rasskazova E. I., Neyaskina Yu. Yu., Dorfman L. Ya., Alexandrova L. A. Operationalization of the five-factor model of personality traits in the Russian sample. Psikhologicheskaia diagnostika, 2015, no. 3, pp. 80–104. (In Russian)
26. Osin E. N. Measurement of positive and negative emotions: development of a Russian-language analog of the PANAS method. Psikhologiia. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2012, vol. 9 (4), pp. 91–110. (In Russian)
27. Zhukovskaya L. V., Troshikhina E. G. Scale of psychological well-being K. Riff. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2011, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 82–93. (In Russian)
28. Belinskaya E. P., Vecherin A. V., Agadullina E. R. Questionnaire of proactive coping: adaptation on a non-clinical sample and prognostic possibilities. Klinicheskaia i spetsial’naia psikhologiia, 2018, vol. 7 (3), pp. 192–211. (In Russian)
29. Brown K. W., Ryan R. M. The Benefits of Being Present: Mindfulness and Its Role in Psychological Well-Being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003, vol. 84 (4), pp. 822–848.