Previous issue (2019. Vol. 12, no. 2)
Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)
The effects of psycholinguistic variables on the behavior of associative processes 280
, Postgraduate, Institute of Linguistics of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, email@example.comGrigoriev A.A.
, Doctor of Psychology, Chief researcher of the laboratory of psychology and psychophysiology of creative activity, Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, firstname.lastname@example.org
The psycholinguistic variables — word frequency, age of acquisition and etc. — affect the human’s processing of information. In this paper, we explore the effects of the four psycholinguistic variables — word frequency, age of acquisition, word familiarity and imageability — on the associative processes, that is, on the probability that words will appear as the associations for verbal stimuli; this probability isestimated by association abundance (the amount of different stimulus words which elicit these associations in the associative dictionary). The study is done using 286 words for which ones there are normative data for all variables. The main goal of this study is to find out the independent effects of each abovementioned psycholinguistic variables on association abundance. This is done by determining whether the including of one of the psycholinguistic variables as an additional predictor in the regression equation where the criterion is association abundance and the predictors — some other psycholinguistic variables leads to the significant increasing of the efficiency of the prediction. The received results show the independent effects of word frequency and age of acquisition on association abundance (the increasing of the efficiency of the prediction is significant, p<0.001 in both cases). These effects for word familiarity and word imageabilityhaven’t been detected.
Gol’din V.E. Russian associative dictionary:
associative reactions of school boys I—XI grades: in 2 v. V. II. From reaction
to stimulus. P. 1. A—N / V.E. Gol’din, A.P. Sdobnova, A.O. Mart’yanov. Saratov:
Izd-vo Sarat. un-ty, 2011. 480 p.
Kolbeneva M.G., Aleksandrov U.I. The Emotions and
Adjective of the Russian language. 1. The Adjectives which characterize
eyesight, acusis, taste and olfaction // Experimental psychology. 2011. Volume
4. № 1. P. 17—27.
Medyntsev A.A. The Influence of the Implicit Prompt
on the Automatic Data Reduction Processes Within the Anagram Task //
Experimental Psychology. 2017. Volume 10. № 1. P. 23—37. doi:10.17759/
Brown, G.D.A., & Watson, F.L. First in, first
out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word
familiarity and word naming latency. Memory and Cognition. 1987. Т. 15 (3). С.
Elbers L.H., and WA van Loon-Vervoorn. “Taal als
resultaat van actief leren.” Logopedie en Foniatrie. 1990. Т. 69. С.
Ellis A.W., & Morrison C.M. Real
age-of-acquisition effects in lexical retrieval. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 1998. Т. 24 (2). С. 515—523.
Grigoriev A., Oshepkov I. Objective age of
acquisition norms for a set of 286 words in Russian: relationships with other
psycholinguistic variables. Behaviour Research Methods. 2013. Т. 45 (4). С.
Holmes S.J., & Ellis A.W. Age of acquisition
and typically effects in picture naming, object decision and category
verification. Visual Cognition. 2006. Т. 13 (7—8). С. 884—911.
Johnston R.A., & Barry C. Age of acquisition
effects in the semantic processing of pictures. Memory and Cognition. 2005. Т.
33 (5). С. 905—912.
Loon-Vervoorn, WA van. Imageability and age of
acquisition as determinants of word selection in word association // Imagery
and cognition: Proceedings of the Second European Workshop on Imagery and
Cognition / C. Cornoldi (Ed.). University of Padua, Italy. 1988. С.
Monaghan, J., & Ellis A.W. Age of acquisition
and the completeness of phonological representations. Reading and Writing: An
Interdisciplinary Journal. 2002. Т. 15 (7—8). С. 759—788.
Moore V., Smith-Spark J.H., & Valentine T. The
effects of age of acquisition on object recognition. European Journal of
Cognitive Psychology. 2004. Т. 16 (3). С. 417—439.
Morrison C.M., & Ellis A.W. Roles of word
frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1995. Т. 21 (1).
С. 116— 133.
Morrison C.M., & Ellis A.W. Real age of
acquisition effects in word naming and lexical decision. British Journal of
Psychology. 2000. Т. 91. С. 167—180.
Morrison C.M., Hirsh K.W., Chappell T., & Ellis
A.W. Age and age of acquisition: An evaluation of the cumulative frequency
hypothesis. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2002. Т. 14 (4). С.
Preston K.A. (1935). “The speed of word perception
and its relation to reading ability.” The Journalof General Psychology,
Thorndike E.L. (1931). A teacher’s word book of
20,000 words. NewYork: Teacher’s College Press.
Turner J. E., Valentine T., & Ellis A.W.
Contrasting effects of age of acquisition and word frequency on auditory and
visual lexical decision. Memory and Cognition. 1998. Т. 26 (6). С.
Van Loon-Vervoorn, Anita, and Miep Ham-Van Van Der
Koppen. The importance of age of word acquisition for imageability in word
processing // Cognitive and neuropsychological approaches to mental imagery /
M. Denis, J. Engelkamp, J.T.E. Richardson (Eds.). Springer Netherlands. 1988.
Van Loon-Vervoorn W.A. Eigenschappen van
basiswoorden [Characteristics of base-words]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets and