Современная зарубежная психология
2015. Том 4. № 2. С. 20–27
doi:10.17759/jmfp.2015040203
ISSN: 2304-4977 (online)
Тимбилдинг в студенческой аудитории: за и против
Аннотация
Общая информация
Ключевые слова: командообразование, командная/совместная деятельность, коллаборативные методы, аттитьюды, командные роли, лидерство, фри-райдинг
Рубрика издания: Социальная психология
Тип материала: научная статья
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2015040203
Для цитаты: Екимова В.И. Тимбилдинг в студенческой аудитории: за и против [Электронный ресурс] // Современная зарубежная психология. 2015. Том 4. № 2. С. 20–27. DOI: 10.17759/jmfp.2015040203
Литература
- Гудвин Дж. Исследование в психологии [Research in psychology]: Методы и планирование. СПб.: Питер, 2004. 558 с.
- A study of students’ attitudes towards cooperative learning / Akhtar K. [et al.] // International Journal of Humanities and Social Science. 2012. Vol. 2, № 11. P. 141–147.
- Aggarwal A., Woolley A.W. Do you see what I see? The effect of members’ cognitive styles on team processes and errors in task execution // Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes. 2012. № 122 (1). P. 92–99.
- Ashraf M. A critical look at the use of group projects as a pedagogical tool // Journal of Education for Busines. 2004. Vol. 79, № 4. P. 213–216. doi: 10.3200/JOEB.79.4.213-216.
- Bacon D.R., Stewart K.A., Silver W.S. Lessons from the best and worst student team experiences: How a teacher can make a difference // Journal of Management Education. 1999. Vol. 23, № 5. P. 467–488.
- Baron R.S., Kerr N.L. Group process, group decision, group action. 2nd ed. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press. 2003. 260 p.
- Bolton M.K. The role of coaching in student teams: A ‘just-in-time’ approach to learning // Journal of Management Education. 1999. Vol. 23, № 3. P. 233–250. doi: 10.1177/105256299902300302.
- Brooks C.M., Ammons J.L. Free riding in group projects and the effects of timing, frequency, and specificity of criteria in peer assessments // Journal of Education for Business. 2003. Vol. 78, № 5. P. 268–272. doi: 10.1080/08832320309598613.
- Cannon-Bowers J.A., Bowers C. Team development and functioning // APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology Vol. 1. Building and developing the organization / S. Zedeck (Ed.). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association, 2010. P. 597–650.
- Does team building work? / Klein C. [et al.] // Small Group Research. 2009. Vol. 40, № 2. P. 181–222. DOI: 10.1177/1046496408328821.
- Ettington D., Camp R. Facilitating transfer of skills between group projects and work teams // Journal of Management Education. 2002. Vol. 26, № 4. P. 356–379. doi: 10.1177/105256290202600404.
- Evidence for the collective intelligence factor in the performance of human group / Woolley A.W. [et al.] // Science. 2010. Vol. 330. № 6004. P. 686–688. doi: 10.1126/science.1193147.
- Fredrick T.A. Facilitating better teamwork: analysing the challenges and strategies of classroom-based collaboration // Business Communication Quarterly. 2008. Vol. 71 (4). P. 439–455. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569908325860. doi: 10.1177/1080569908325860.
- Haberyan A. Team-Based learning in an Industrial: Organizational Psychology Course // North American Journal of Psychology. 2007. Vol. 9, № 1. P. 143–152.
- Hansen R. Benefits and problems with student teams: suggestions for improving team projects // Journal of Education for Business. 2006. Vol. 82, №1. P. 11–19. doi: 10.3200/JOEB.82.1.11-19.
- Hare A.P. Groups, teams, and social interaction: theories and applications. New York: Praeger. 1993. 177 p.
- Holloway J.H. Student teamwork // Educational Leadership. 2004. Vol. 61, № 4. P. 91–92.
- Michaelsen L.K., Knight A.B., Fink L.D. Team-based learning : A Transformative Use of Small Groups.Westpost: Greenwood Publishing Group. 2002, 288 p.
- Mullen B., Driskell J.E., Salas E. Meta-analysis and the study of group dynamics // Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice. 1998. Vol. 2, № 4. P. 213–229. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.2.4.213.
- Paff E., Huddleston P. Does it matters if I hate teamwork? What impacts student attitudes toward teamwork? // Journal of Marketing Education. 2003. Vol. 23, № 1. P. 37–45. doi: 10.1177/0273475302250571.
- Pentland A. The new science of building great team // Harward Business Review. Harvard: Harvard Business School Pub 2012. P. 62–70.
- Pineda R.C., Barger B., Lerner L.D. Exploring differences in student perceptions of teamwork: the case of U.S. and Lithuanian students // Journal of International Business & Cultural Studies. 2009. Vol. 1. P. 1–9.
- Robbins T.L., Fredendall L.D. Correlates of team success in higher education // Journal of Social Psychology. 2001. Vol. 141, № 1. P. 135–136. doi: 10.1080/00224540109600534.
- Rudawska A., Szarek M. Students’ attitudes towards teamwork and their group effectiveness // E-mentor. 2014. Vol. 3, № 55. P. 12–21. doi: 10.15219/em55.1104.
- Sustaining faculty organizational development through teambuilding activities / Ismail I.A. [et al.] // The journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning. 2008. Vol. 4, № 2. P. 201–211.
- Thompson D., Anitsal I., Barrett H. Attitudes toward teamwork in higher education: a comparative study of religiously affiliated universities and secular-based universities // Allied Academies International Conference. Academy of Educational Leadership. Proceedings. 2008. Vol. 13, № 2. P. 86–98.
- Undergraduate marketing students group projects and teamwork: The good, the bad, and the ugly / McCorkle D.E. [et al.] // Journal of Marketing Education. 1999. Vol. 21, № 2. P. 106–117. doi: 10.1177/0273475399212004.
- Underwood J.D.M. Student attitude towards socially acceptable and unacceptable group working practices // British Journal of Psychology. 2003. Vol. 94, № 3. P. 319–337. doi: 10.1348/000712603767876253.
- Wheeler D., Stoller J.K. Teamwork, teambuilding and leadership in respiratory and health care // Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy. 2011. Vol. 47, № 1. P. 6–11.
- Wolfe A.M. Student attitudes toward team projects // Midwest Business Administration Association (MBAA) International Spring Conference. Chicago, Illinois: Marketing Management Association. 2008. P. 119–126.
Информация об авторах
Метрики
Просмотров
Всего: 2794
В прошлом месяце: 3
В текущем месяце: 12
Скачиваний
Всего: 2365
В прошлом месяце: 6
В текущем месяце: 5