Портал психологических изданий PsyJournals.ru
Каталог изданий 96Рубрики 51Авторы 8382Ключевые слова 20536 Online-сборники 1 АвторамRSS RSS

Включен в Web of Science СС (ESCI)

ВАК

РИНЦ

Рейтинг Science Index РИНЦ 2017

27 место — направление «Психология»

0,539 — показатель журнала в рейтинге SCIENCE INDEX

0,598 — двухлетний импакт-фактор

CrossRef

Психология и право

Издатель: Московский государственный психолого-педагогический университет

ISSN (online): 2222-5196

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/psylaw

Лицензия: CC BY-NC 4.0

Издается с 2010 года

Периодичность: 4 номера в год

Формат: электронное издание

Доступ к электронным архивам: открытый

«Психология и право»

мобильное приложение
для iPad и iPhone

Доступно в App Store
Скачайте бесплатно

 

Legal and Psychological Aspects of Mediation 768

Доброхотова Е.Н., кандидат юридических наук, Санкт-Петербург, Россия, Dobrohotova.E@jurfak.spb.ru

Аннотация

The article focuses on gradual innovation of mediation into the practice of social conflict resolution in the light of legal and psychological means of mediation. While mediation is perceived as a conflictological concept and is more widely used in dispute settlement and resolution, a new interdisciplinary field of theoretical knowledge with its own conceptual framework as well as a new professional and practical field are beginning to form both in Russia and in other countries. As theoretical and practical aspects of innovation in mediation require consolidation not only for its national development but also for the guaranteed international cooperation, the article touches upon some of the particular theoretical issues of the topic in question: terminological consistency, consolidation of the system of mediation principles, the phenomenon of juridisation of mediation and its limits.

Ссылка для цитирования

Фрагмент статьи

Mediation is a fairly new method, a so called alternative dispute resolution method (Abbrev. ADR), and therefore it is not thoroughly studied.  Due to the fact that in Russia the process has just started and there is cultural impact on mediation practice in different countries, neither Russian nor foreign studies have developed terminological consistency. Therefore, it is difficult to provide a scientific classification of ADR. Such a classification would make it possible to conduct a comparative analysis and further universalization, which are definitely essential not only for the scientific support of mediation development but also for its management. Not surprisingly, today the term mediation is used in various interpretations in publications, legislation and especially in discussions. It is rather common to interpret it as any means of resolving a dispute (a case) other than classical legal judicial proceedings established by the procedural legislation. As a result, it seems appropriate to offer a definition of mediation the way the author of this article sees it, which should provide for the proper understanding of the text and for the correct critique of its ideas.

<...>

Литература
  1. A Big Dialogue on Family Mediation, Mediation and Law. Vol. 1 (27), 2013, p. 17, pp.10-24.
  2. The Directive 2008/52/EC of the European Parliament of 21 May 2008  On Certain Aspects of Mediation in Civil and Commercial Matters.
  3. The Model Law on International Commercial Conciliation of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (adopted by the Resolution 57/18 of the General Assembly on 19 November 2002); The Directive 2008/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 On Certain Aspects of Mediation in Civil and Commercial Matters.
  4. The FIM Reviews the Past Year, Mediation and Law. Vol. 1 (27), March 2013, p. 12.
  5. The Bulletin of the Federal Institute of Mediation 2013. Science editor T. Shamlikashvili. Moscow, Publishing Inter-regional center of administrative and policy advice, 2013, pp. 207-229.
  6. Denisenko V.V. Legitimacy as a Characteristic Feature of the Essence of the Law. Introduction into the Theory. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 2014. pp. 133-142.
  7. Menkel-Meadow C. Why We Must not Forget about What Seems Best to Forget, Mediation and Law. Vol. 1 (30), March 2014, pp. 41, 43, 45, 51.
  8. Menkel-Meadow C. Why We Must not Forget about What Seems Best to Forget, Mediation and Law. Vol. 1 (27), 2013, p. 52.
  9. Mironi M. An Easy Way Away from the Purpose, Mediation and Law. Vol.1 (27), 2013, p. 61.
  10. Mironi M. Op. cit., pp. 59-66.
  11. Nosyrev, E.I. Posrednichestvo v Uregulirovanii Pravovyh Sporov: Opyt SSA [Mediation in Legal Dispute Settlement: the Experience of the USA]. Gosudarstvo i Pravo, Vol.5, 1997, pp. 109-114.
  12. Nosyreva E. op. cit.
 
О проекте PsyJournals.ru

© 2007–2019 Портал психологических изданий PsyJournals.ru  Все права защищены

Свидетельство регистрации СМИ Эл № ФС77-66447 от 14 июля 2016 г.

Издатель: ФГБОУ ВО МГППУ

Creative Commons License

Яндекс.Метрика