Spatial working memory in visual search for multiple targets

1413

Abstract

The article investigated the role of spatial working memory in visual search for multiple targets, in particular, in subsequent search misses effect. This phenomenon is the second target omission after the first target has been found in visual search task. One of the theoretical interpretations of subsequent search misses is the lack of resources (attention and/or working memory) after the first target is found. Experiment investigated dual-target visual search efficiency in standard conditions and with additional spatial working memory load. Additional working memory load did not have any significant impact in multiple target visual search efficiency. The results can due to the role of object, but not spatial working memory in this task. Alternative explanation assumes using special tools and strategies.

General Information

Keywords: visual attention, working memory, visual search, subsequent search misses, strategies of perceptual task solution

Journal rubric: Cognitive Psychology

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2017100104

For citation: Gorbunova E.S. Spatial working memory in visual search for multiple targets. Eksperimental'naâ psihologiâ = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2017. Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 38–52. DOI: 10.17759/exppsy.2017100104. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Adamo S. H., Cain M. S., Mitroff S. R. Self-Induced Attentional Blink: A Cause of Errors in Multiple-Target Search. Psychological Science, 2013, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 2569–2574. doi: 10.1177/0956797613497970
  2. AdamoS.H.,CainM.S.,MitroffS.R.Targetsneedtheirownpersonalspace:effectsofclutteronmultiple-target search accuracy. Perception, 2015, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 1203–1214. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2012.726448
  3. Biggs A. T., Adamo S. H., Dowd E. W., Mitroff S. R. Examining perceptual and conceptual set biases in multiple-target visual search. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 2015, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 844–855. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0822-0
  4. Cain M. S., Biggs A. T., Darling E. F., Mitroff S. R. A little bit of history repeating: Splitting up multiple- target visual searches decreases second-target miss errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2014, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 112–125. doi: 10.1037/xap0000014
  5. Cain M.S., Adamo S.H., Mitroff S.R. A taxonomy of errors in multiple-target visual search. Visual Cogni- tion, 2013, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 899–921. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2013.843627
  6. Cain M.S., Mitroff S.R. Memory for found targets interferes with subsequent performance in multiple- target visual search. The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2013, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1398–1408. doi: 10.1037/a0030726
  7. Fleck M. S., Samei E., Mitroff S. R. Generalized “Satisfaction of Search”: Adverse Influences on Dual- Target Search Accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 2010, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 60–71. doi: 10.1037/a0018629
  8. Gorbunova E. Perceptual similarity in visual search for multiple targets. Acta Psychologica, 2017, vol. 173, pp. 46–54. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.11.010.
  9. Horowitz T.S., Wolfe J.M. Visual search has no memory. Nature, 1998, vol. 394 (6693), pp. 575–577. doi: 10.1038/29068
  10. Kwak H.-W., Dagenbach D., Egeth H. Further evidence for a time-independent shift of the focus of at- tention. Perception & Psychophysics, 1991, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 473–480. doi: 10.3758/BF03212181
  11. Moraglia G. Display organization and the detection of horizontal line segments. Perception & Psycho- physics, 1989, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 265–272. doi: 10.3758/BF03210706
  12. Oh S.H., Kim M.S. The role of spatial working memory in visual search efficiency. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2004, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 275–281. doi: 10.3758/BF03196570
  13. Pechenkova E.V., Falikman M.V. Reshenie pertseptivnoi zadachi kak vzaimodeistvie mezhdu vosk- hodyashchimi i niskhodyashchimi protsessami pererabotki zritel’noi informatsii [The perceptual task solu- tion as the interaction between bottom-up and top-down processes of information processing]. Teoretiches- kaya i eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Theoretical and Experimental Psychology], 2010, no. 3, pp. 52–65. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
  14. Samuel S., Kundel H.L., Nodine C.F., Toto L.C. Mechanism of satisfaction of search: eye position record- ings in the reading of chest radiographs. Radiology, 1995, vol. 194, no. 3, pp. 895–902. doi: 10.1148/radiol- ogy.194.3.7862998
  15. Woodman G. F., Vogel E. K., Luck S. J. Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full. Psychological Science, 2001, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 219–224. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00339
  16. Woodman G.F., Luck S.J. Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied. Psy- chonomic Bulletin & Review, 2004, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 269–274. doi: 10.3758/BF03196569

Information About the Authors

Elena S. Gorbunova, PhD in Psychology, LAssociate Professor, Head of Laboratory of Cognitive Psychology of Digital Interfaces User, School of Psychology, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3646-2605, e-mail: gorbunovaes@gmail.com

Metrics

Views

Total: 2668
Previous month: 33
Current month: 13

Downloads

Total: 1413
Previous month: 16
Current month: 28