Pandemic in the Context of on Environmental Consciousness

The article is directly related to the subject of common interest — COVID-19 pandemic, which significantly impacts the entire world community. In the paper, we consider the spread of coronavirus infection as one of the consequences of active use of the natural environment and its resources by humans. Psychologically, the current ecological crisis stems from the regularities of the human consciousness formation. The present study empirically examines the impact of the COVID-19 hazard estimation on the nature-human interaction assessment. The study involved 372 participants (42% men and 58% women), the mean age of the subjects was 33.9 years (SD = 11.4 years). The data obtained shows that the perception of COVID-19 as a serious disease is associated with the apprehension of nature as adverse for humans, fear of natural forces (F = 12.307; p < 0.001), — perceptions characterizing the archaic type of environmental consciousness. At the same time, younger people assess the negative impact of nature on humans significantly lower than the older respondents (chi-square = 14.041; p < 0.001), and at the same time, recognizing the danger of the coronavirus, they are concerned about the natural environment preservation, demonstrating an ecocentric type of environmental consciousness.

1. Daidzhest. Vozdeistvie pandemii COVID-19 na promyshlennost’ i ekologiyu [Elektronnyi resurs] [Digest. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on industry and the environment] // URL: https://ach.gov. ru/upload/pdf/Covid-19-prom.pdf (data obrashcheniya 2.02.2021) (In Russ.).
2. Emel’yanova T.P., Nestik T.A., Belykh T.V. Otnoshenie k ekologicheskim riskam sredi predstavitelei pokolenii Y i Z [Elektronnyi resurs] [Attitudes to environmental risks among generations Y and Z] // Institut psikhologii Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Sotsial’naya i ekonomicheskaya psikhologiya [Institute of psychology Russian Academy of Sciences Social and economic psychology]. 2019. Vol. 4. no. 3(15), pp. 62—82. URL: http://soc-econom-psychology.ru/cntnt/bloks/dop-menu/archive/n2019/t4-3/n19-03-03.html (data obrashcheniya: 12.03.2021). (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
3. Kochkina E.V. Samosokhranitel’noe povedenie v period pandemii [Self-preservation behavior during a pandemic] [Elektronnyi resurs] // Sotsiodigger: Zdorov’e. Zdravookhranenie. Bioetika [Sociodigger: Health. Healthcare. Bioethics.]. 2020. Vol. 1. Issue. 4, pp. 23—30. URL: https://sociodigger.ru/ (data obrashcheniya 1.02.2021). (In Russ.).
4. Lukovtseva Z.V. Pandemiya COVID-19 kak sotsial’nyi stressor: faktory psikhologo-psikhiatricheskogo riska (po materialam zarubezhnykh issledovanii) [The COVID-19 Pandemic as a Social Stressor: Psychologicaland Psychiatric Risk Factors (Based on Foreign Studies)] // Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo [Social psychology and society]. 2020. Vol. 11. no. 4, pp. 13—25. DOI:10.17759/sps.2020110402. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
5. Mdivani M.O., Aleksandrova E.S. Psikhosemanticheskoe issledovanie vospriyatiya ponyatii “priroda” i “okruzhayushchaya sreda” molodezh’yu [Psychosemantic study of the perception of the concepts of “nature” and “environment” by young people] // Sotsializatsiya cheloveka v sovremennom mire v interesakh ustoichivogo razvitiya obshchestva: mezhdistsiplinarnyi podkhod. 2017. pp. 134—142. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
6. Panov V.I. Ekologicheskoe soznanie v paradigmal’nom kontekste ponyatiya «priroda» [Environmental consciousness in the paradigm of the “nature” concept] // Noosfernye issledovaniya [Noosphere research]. 2017. no. 2 (18), pp. 17—30. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
7. Panov V.I., Mdivani M.O., Kodess P.B., Lidskaya E.V., Khisambeev Sh.R. Ekologicheskoe soznanie: teoriya, metodologiya, diagnostika [Environmental awareness: the theory, methodology, diagnostics] // Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika. Tematicheskii vypusk [Psychological diagnostics. Special Issue]. 2012. no. 1. 126 p. (In Russ.).
8. Rasskazova E.I., Leont’ev D.A., Lebedeva A.A. Pandemiya kak vyzov sub”ektivnomu blagopoluchiyu: trevoga i sovladanie [Pandemic as a Challenge to Sub-jective Well-Being: Anxiety and Coping] // Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2020. Vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 90—108. DOI: 10.17759/cpp.2020280205. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
9. Smolova L.V. Issledovanie vospriyatiya ekologicheskikh riskov v urbanisticheskoi srede [Research on the perception of environmental risks in the urban environment] // Uchenye zapiski Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta psikhologii i sotsial’noi raboty [Scientific notes journal of St. Petersburg state institute of psychology and social work]. 2005. Vol. 5. pp. 51—56. (In Russ.).
10. Yasvin V.A. Psikhologiya otnosheniya k prirode [Psychology relation to the nature]. Moscow: Smysl Publ., 2000. 456 p. (In Russ.).
11. COVID-19: psikhologicheskie effekty epidemii. Chem pomoch’ medikam? [COVID-19: Psychological Effects of the Pandemic. How to Help Healthcare Work-ers?] // [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2020. Vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 190—196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2020280211. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
12. Bobylev S.N. Environmental consequences of COVID-19 on the global and Russian economics // Population and Economics. 2020. Vol. 4(2). P. 43—48. doi:10.3897/popecon.4.e53279
13. Brooks S.K, Webster R.K, Smith L.E. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence // Lancet. 2020. Vol. 395(10227). P. 912—920. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8
14. Grodzinska-jurczak M., Krawczyk A., Jurczak A., Strzelecka M., Rechcinski M., Bockowski M. Environmental choices vs. Covid-19 pandemic fear — plastic governance re-assessment // Society Register. 2020. Vol. 4(2). P. 49-66. doi: 10.14746/sr.2020.4.2.04.
15. Haasova S., Czellar S., Rahmani L., Morgan N. Connectedness With Nature and Individual Responses to a Pandemic: An Exploratory Study // Frontiers in Psychology. 2020. Sept. 11:2215. doi: 10.3389/ fpsyg.2020.02215
16. Ali Q., Parveen S., Yaacob H., Zaini Z., Sarbini N.A. COVID-19 and dynamics of environmental awareness, sustainable consumption and social responsibility in Malaysia // Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021. Apr. 28(16):19589-19600. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-14612-z
17. Rodriguez B., Sanchez T. The Psychosocial Impact of COVID-19 on health care workers // International Brazilian Journal of Urology. 2020. Vol. 46 (1). P. 195—200. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.S124
18. Sarkodie S.A., Owusu P.A. Global assessment of environment, health and economic impact of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) // Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2020. Vol. 23, P. 5005—5015. doi: 10.1007/s10668-020-00801-2
19. Severo E.A., De Guimarães J.C.F., Dellarmelin M.L. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on environmental awareness, sustainable consumption and social responsibility: Evidence from generations in Brazil and Portugal // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021. Mar 1;286:124947. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124947
20. Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss [Электронный ресурс] // URL: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/biodiversity/ (дата обращения: 15.03.2021)