Urban Capital and the Chronotope of the City: a New Look at Urban Everyday Life

61

Abstract

The article considers various aspects of urban everyday life, its role in the development of motivation and individualization of human life strategies. The concept of urban capital is introduced and its forms, which positively and negatively affect the formation of the features of urban everyday life, are revealed. The levels of urban capital, which allow to explore the individual style of urban socialization are highlighted. Furthermore, the relationship between urban identity and the internal form of the city chronotope is analyzed. It is shown that common to all variants of human positioning in the city space is the identification or attitude to various aspects of urban capital — localization, city status, social and ecological environment. It is proved that the main difference between these concepts is in the focusing of urban identity (as well as in a sharper form of urban capital) on the external parameters of the city environment, while the internal form of the urban chronotope emphasizes the inner feeling of a person, his own experience in certain places and time in a particular cityscape. This difference indicates the role of the personal chronotope, its internal form in the self-development and self-realization of a person and the connection with existence, intentionality of the personality. The similarity of the concepts of individual chronotope and small chronotope is shown; their influence on the development of the plot (in literature) and the structuring of the human world (in psychology) is analyzed. The relationship between individual parameters of the internal form of a personal chronotope as well as places and times in a small chronotope in their role in restructuring the large chronotope of a city into the human world is examined.

General Information

Keywords: urban everyday life, urban identity, a large and a small chronotopes of the city, urban capital

Journal rubric: Theoretical and Methodological Problems in Psychology

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2021.401

Funding. The study was supported by Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project nо. 20-013-00075

Received: 25.08.2021

Accepted:

For citation: Martsinkovskaya T.D. Urban Capital and the Chronotope of the City: a New Look at Urban Everyday Life. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 2021. Vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 301–311. DOI: 10.21638/spbu16.2021.401. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

Bakhtin, M.M. (1997). Collected works: in 7 vols. Vol. 5. Works of the 1940s — early 1960s. Moscow, Russkiye slovari, Yаzyki slavyanskikh kul’tur Publ. (In Russian)

Bourdieu, P. (2002). Forms of capital. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya, 3, 5, 60–74. (In Russian)

Certeau, M.de. (2013). The invention of everyday life. St. Petersburg, Yevropeyski universitet v Sankt-Peterburge Press. (In Russian)

Coleman, J. (2001). Social and human capital. Obshchestvennyye nauki i sovremennost’, 3, 121–139. (In Russian)

Diagileva, N. S. (2013). Theoretical aspects of urban identity. Brending malykh i srednikh gorodov Rossii: opyt, problemy, perspektivy (pp. 54–59). Ekaterinburg, UrFU Publ. (In Russian)

DiMaggio, P., Mohr, J. (1985). Cultural capital, educational attainment, and marital selection. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 1231–1261.

Giddens, E. (2011). Consequences of modernity. Moscow, Praksis Publ. (In Russian)

Golubeva, N.A., Konchalovskaia, M.M. (2013). Territorial identity and value orientations as factors of structuring social space. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia, 6, 32, 7. http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2013v6n32/909-golubeva32.html (accessed: 06.11.2021). (In Russian)

Lalli, M. (1992). Urban-related identity: Theory, measurement, and empirical findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12 (4), 285–303. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80078-7

Lewin, K. (2001). Dynamic psychology: selected works. Moscow, Smysl Publ. (In Russian)

Martsinkovskaya, T.D. (2020). Psychological concept of S.L.Rubinstein in the context of the ideas of I.V.Goethe and V.I.Vernadsky. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 10, 1, 7–17. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2020.101 (In Russian)

Martsinkovskaya, T.D, Siiuchenko, A. S. (2014). Identity as a factor of socialization in a multicultural environment. Voprosy psikhologii, 6, 3–13. (In Russian)

Martsinkovskaya, T.D. (2017). The internal form of the psychological chronotope: approaches to the problem. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia, 10, 54, 1. http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2017v10n54/1448-martsinkovskaya54.html (accessed: 06.11.2021). (In Russian)

Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24.

Putnam, R.D. (2002). Democracies in flux: The evolution of social capital in contemporary society. New York: Oxford University Press.

Tennis, F. (2002). Community and Society. Basic concepts of pure sociology. St. Petersburg, Vladimir Dal’ Publ. (In Russian)

Wordsworth, W. (1979). The Prelude, Authoritative Texts. New York, London: A Norton Critical Edition.

Information About the Authors

Tatiana D. Martsinkovskaya, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Director of the Institute, Institute of psychology named after L. Vygotsky, Russian State University for the humanities, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2810-2554, e-mail: tdmartsin@gmail.com

Metrics

Views

Total: 151
Previous month: 8
Current month: 0

Downloads

Total: 61
Previous month: 4
Current month: 3