Construction of Situation of the Own Action: Mode of Action and Intention

613

Abstract

This study represents an attempt to construct such a model situation that would provoke the deliberate creation and appropriation of the general mode of action and, accordingly, identify and describe the criteria for full-scale mediation. The following situations were lined up in the experiment: a) with the possibility of solving either by means of the developed tool or directly; b) with the possibility of variative display of own action or effort to the participant; c) based on the different methods of intention initiation. The study involved 98 participants — students of 2nd, 6th and 9th grades of a secondary school. The following key findings were made in the study: the construction of intentional action requires a complex mediation, consisting of three levels of interrelated tools: the means for solving a specific task, the means of relating several tasks, the means of generalizing a group of tasks; construction of means for solving a specific task requires testing the means' possibilities of allocation of the activity object key characteristics.

General Information

Keywords: mediation, mode of action, subjectivation, intention, experience

Journal rubric: Empirical Research

Article type: scientific article

For citation: Egorova A.A. Construction of Situation of the Own Action: Mode of Action and Intention. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2010. Vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 18–28. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Bercfai L. V. Formirovanie umeniya v situacii resheniya konkretnoprakticheskih i uchebnyh zadach // Voprosy psihologii. 1966. № 6.
  2. Bogoyavlenskaya D. B. Psihologiya tvorcheskih sposobnostei: Ucheb. posobie dlya stud. vyssh. ucheb. zavedenii. M., 2001.
  3. Vygotsky L. S. Sobranie sochinenii: V 6 t. T. 1. M., 1983.
  4. Vygotsky L. S. Sobranie sochinenii: V 6 t. T. 3. M., 1983.
  5. Vygotsky L. S. Sobranie sochinenii: V 6 t. T. 4. M., 1984.
  6. Vygotsky L. S. Sobranie sochinenii: V 6 t. T. 6. M., 1984.
  7. Gal'perin P. Ya. Lekcii po psihologii: Ucheb. posobie dlya stud. vuzov. M., 2002.
  8. Gal'perin P. Ya. Funkcional'nye razlichiya mezhdu orudiem i sredstvom // Hrestomatiya po vozrastnoi i pedagogicheskoi psihologii / Pod red. V. Ya. Lyaudis, I. I. Il'yasova. M., 1979.
  9. Gordeeva N. D., Zinchenko V. P. Funkcional'naya struktura deistviya. M., 1982.
  10. Davydov V. V. Analiz struktury myslitel'nogo akta // Doklady APN RSFSR. 1960. № 2.
  11. Davydov V. V. Teoriya razvivayushego obucheniya. M., 1996.
  12. Dunker K. Struktura i dinamika processov resheniya zadach // Hrestomatiya po obshei psihologii. Psihologiya myshleniya / Pod red. Yu. B. Gippenreiter, V. V. Petuhova. M., 1981.
  13. Egorova A. A. Modelirovanie kak uslovie porozhdeniya podrostkami osmyslennyh gipotez (na primere gipotez o stroenii i funkcionirovanii zhivyh sushestv) // Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psihologiya. 2006. № 2.
  14. Egorova A. A. Fenomeny postroeniya sposoba deistviya // Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psihologiya. 2009. № 1.
  15. Zhulanova I. V. Produktivnoe deistvie v postroenii iskusstvennyh ponyatii: Kand. dis. M.Volgograd, 1998.
  16. Zaporozhec A. V. Izbrannye psihologicheskie trudy: V 2 t. T. 2. Razvitie proizvol'nyh dvizhenii. M., 1986.
  17. Zeigarnik B. V. Teoriya lichnosti K. Levina. M., 1981.
  18. Levin K. Dinamicheskaya psihologiya: Izbrannye trudy. M., 2001.
  19. Leont'ev A. N. Deyatel'nost'. Soznanie. Lichnost'. M., 1975.
  20. Leont'ev A. N. Stanovlenie psihologii deyatel'nosti: Rannie raboty / Pod red. A. A. Leont'eva, D. A. Leont'eva, E. E. Sokolovoi. M., 2003.
  21. Lisina M. I. O nekotoryh usloviyah prevrasheniya neproizvol'nyh reakcii v proizvol'nye // Doklady APN RSFSR. 1957. № 1.
  22. Mamardashvili M. K. Estetika myshleniya. M., 2000.
  23. Nezhnov P. G. Oposredstvovanie i spontannost' v modeli «kul'turnogo razvitiya» // Vestn. Mosk. unta. Ser. 14. Psihologiya. 2007. № 1.
  24. Nezhnov P. G. «Funkcional'noe pole» kak celevoi orientir v razvivayushem obuchenii // Kul'turno-istoricheskaya teoriya L. S. Vygotskogo i osnovaniya sovremennoi psihologii razvitiya: Мaterialy po itogam konfernsii (14—16 apr. 2005 g.) M., 2006.
  25. Obuhova L.F. Formirovanie sistemy fizicheskih ponyatii v primenenii k resheniyu zadach // Zavisimost' obucheniya ot tipa orientirovochnoi deyatel'nosti / Pod red. P. Ya. Gal'perina. M., 1968.
  26. Polivanova K.N. Psihologiya vozrastnyh krizisov: Ucheb. posobie dlya stud. vyssh. ped. ucheb. zavedenii. M., 2000.
  27. Thostov A.Sh. Psihologiya telesnosti. M., 2002.
  28. Hoziev V.B. Oposredstvovanie v teorii i praktike kul'turnoistoricheskoi koncepcii // Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psihologiya. 2005. № 1.
  29. El'konin B.D. Vvedenie v psihologiyu razvitiya (v tradicii kul'turnoistoricheskoi teorii L. S. Vygotskogo). M., 1994.
  30. El'konin B.D. L. S. Vygotskii -D. B. El'konin: znakovoe oposredstvovanie i sovokupnoe deistvie // Voprosy psihologii. 1996. № 5.
  31. El'konin B.D. O sposobe oposredstvovaniya resheniya zadach na soobrazhenie // Voprosy psihologii.1971. № 11.
  32. El'konin D.B. Detskaya psihologiya. M., 1960.
  33. El'konin D.B. Izbrannye psihologicheskie trudy. M., 1989.

Information About the Authors

Anna A. Egorova, Junior Research Fellow, Psychology of Junior Schoolchildren Laboratory, Psychological Institute of the Russian Academy of Education, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: ayegorova@yandex.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 3631
Previous month: 15
Current month: 9

Downloads

Total: 613
Previous month: 2
Current month: 0