Empathy: Critical Analysis and New Research Perspectives

The purpose of this work is to critically analyze the current state of empathy research as well as to discuss some new lines of research. The relevance of addressing the concept of empathy can be explained in the following manner: if we assume that empathy is associated with helping behavior (some researchers of empathy tend in favor of this interpretation), then in the actual situation associated with the processes of globalization as a whole (interaction with members of other cultures), as well as with a high level of migration processes, researchers are faced with a challenge of finding the factors which promote empathic reactions towards the members of other cultures. On the other hand, the concept of empathy, introduced into psychology in 1909 by E. Titchener, has a rather long history in science, but as far as the literature analysis suggests, researchers differ significantly not only in their understanding and definitions of this phenomenon, or in their explanations tof he mechanisms of empathy, but also in methods of its measurement. Although the possibility of consensus is not considered, however, reflection regarding empathy and methods of its measurement is seen as necessary. This paper outlines some perspectives on empathy research, in particular, in the context of intergroup relations.

1. Andreyeva G.M. Psikhologiya sotsial’nogo poznaniya. [The psychology of social cognition]. Moscow: Aspekt press. 2000. 287 p.
2. Batson D. These things called empathy: eight related but distinct phenomena. J. Decety (eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009, pp. 3—15.
3. Borisova D.P., Dvoryanchikov N.V. Empaticheskiye sposobnosti sotrudnikov UIS — vozmozhnosti issledovaniya i perspektivy [Empathic abilities of penal system employees: research opportunities and perspectives]. Psikhologiya i pravo [Psychology and law], 2015, no. 1, pp. 58—69. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.)
4. Castano E., Kidd D. Antisocial behaviour in individual and groups : An empathy-focused approach. In Deaux K. (eds.), The Oxford handbooks of personality and social psychology. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398991.013.0017
5. Cuff B., Brown S.J., Taylor L., Howat D. Empathy: a review of the concept. Emotion Review, 2014. Vol. 7, pp. 1—10.
6. Davis M.H. Empathy: negotiating the border between self and other. L.Z. Tiedens (eds.), The social life of emotions: Studies in emotion and social interaction. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 19—42.
7. Demidova L.YU., Sheryagina Ye.V. Vozmozhnosti i perspektivy izucheniya empatii u lits s anomaliyami seksual’nogo vlecheniya [Opportunities and prospects for the study of empathy in individuals with anomalies of sexual desire]. Psikhologiya i pravo [Psychology and law], 2013, no. 3, pp. 1—18. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.)
8. Dovidio J.F., Gaertner S.L. Intergroup bias. In: S.T. Fiske, D.T. Gilbert, G. Lindzey (eds.), Handbook of social psychology. New Haven : John Wiley & Sons, 2010, pp. 1084—1121.
9. Dovidio J.F., Johnson J.D., Gaertner S.L., Pearson A.R., Saguy T., Ashburn-Nardo L. Empathy and intergroup relations. In: M. Mikulincer, P.R. Shaver (eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature. Washington: American Psychological Association, 2010, pp. 393—408.
10. Dymond R. A. A scale for the measurement of empathic ability. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1949. Vol. 13, pp. 127— 133.
11. Heyes C. Empathy is not in our genes. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2018. Vol. 95, pp. 499—507.
12. Izotova Ye.I. Kognitivnyye i povedencheskiye reprezentatsii empatii v doshkol’nom i mladshem shkol’nom vozraste [Cognitive and behavioral representations of empathy in preschool and primary school age]. Psikhologicheskiye issledovaniya: elektron. nauch. Zhurn [Psychological studies], 2011, no. 5.
13. Jahoda G. Theodor Lipps and the shift from «sympathy» to «empathy». Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 2005. Vol. 41, pp. 151—163.
14. Jorland G., Thirioux B. Note sur l’origine de l’empathie. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, 2008, no 2, pp.269-280.
15. Karyagina T.D. Evolyutsiya ponyatiya «empatiya» v psikhologii. [The evolution of the concept of “empathy” in psychology Ph.D. (Psychology) Thesis]. Moscow, 2013. 175 p.
16. Kholmogorova A.B., Tsarenko D.M., Moskacheva M.A. Narusheniya sotsial’nogo poznaniya pri rasstroystvakh shizofrenicheskogo i affektivnogo spektrov [Disorders of social cognition in disorders of schizophrenic and affective spectra ]. Klinicheskaya i spetsial’naya psikhologiya [Clinical and special psychology], 2016, no. 4, pp. 103—117. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.)
17. Nelson D.W., Baumgarte R. Cross-cultural misunderstanding reduce empathic responding. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2004. Vol. 34, pp.391-401.
18. Neumann D.L., Chan R.C.K., Boyle G.J., Wang Y., Westbury H.R. Measures of empathy: Self-report, behavioral, and neuroscientific approaches. In Boyle G.J. (eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological constructs. Elsevier Academic Press, 2015, pp. 257—289.
19. Nourkova V.V. Cultural patterns of self in autobiographical memory of childhood: Comparison of the Chinese, Russian and Uzbek samples. PsyCh Journal (2020, in press).
20. Pashukova T.I., Troitskaya Ye.A. Mekhanizmy i funktsii empatii [Mechanisms and functions of empathy]. Vestnik MGLU [Herald of MSUL], 2010, no. 7, pp. 197—209.
21. Poddubnaya T.V. Problematika empatii v issledovaniyakh psikhologicheskikh aspektov professional’noy meditsinskoy deyatel’nosti (obzor) [The issue of empathy in studies of the psychological aspects of professional medical activity (review)]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [ Consulting psychology and psychotherapy], 2015, no. 2, pp. 9—36. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.)
22. Rimé B. Le partage social des émotions. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2015. 420 p.
23. Stephan W., Finlay K. The role of empathy in improving intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issue, 1999. Vol. 55, pp. 729—743.
24. Thirioux B., Birault F., Jaafari N. Empathy is a protective factor of burnout in physicians: new neuro-phenomenological hypotheses regarding empathy and sympathy in care relationship. Frontieres in Psychology, 2016, no. 7, pp. 1—11.
25. Vescio T.K., Hewstone M., Crips R.J., Rubin M. Perceiving and responding to multiply categorizable individuals: cognitive processes and affective intergroup bias. In Abrams D. (eds.), Social identity and social cognition. Oxford: Blackwell Publisher, 1999, pp. 111—140.
26. Yudina T.O. Rol’ vrozhdennykh i sredovykh faktorov v razvitii empatii: obzor zarubezhnykh issledovaniy [The role of innate and environmental factors in the development of empathy: a review of foreign studies]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [ Cultural-historical psychology], 2017, no. 2, pp. 13—23. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.)
27. Yusupov I.M. Psikhologiya empatii: teoreticheskiye i prikladnyye aspekty. [Psychology of empathy: theoretical and applied aspects. Ph.D. (Psychology) Thesis]. Saint-Petersburg, 1995. 252 p.
28. Zhou Q., Valiente C., Eisenberg N. Empathy and its measurement. In Lopez S.J. (eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures. Washington: American Psychological Association, 2003, pp. 269—284.