The Relationship Between Social Capital and Acculturation Expectations of Estonians in Estonia: Perceived Threat as a Mediator

199

Abstract

This study examines the mediating role of perceived threat from other ethnic groups in the relationship between social capital and acculturation expectations of the host population. Consistent with Stephans’ theory, the article examined the impact of three types of perceived threat: economic, cultural, and physical. The sample consists of ethnic Estonians born and living in Estonia (N = 309). The study examined how the perceived threat affects the relationship between social capital indicators (general trust, ethnic tolerance, binding and uniting social capital) and acculturation expectations (“multiculturalism”, “melting pot”, “seg regation”). The results showed that physical perceived threat was a mediator of the relationship between ethnic tolerance and “multiculturalism”. With the increase in physical threat, the preference for “multiculturalism” decreased. Economic threat has been shown to mediate the relationship between general trust and “segregation”, as well as connecting social capital and “segregation”. In these two cases, the economic threat increased the likelihood of a preference for “segregation” by the host population. The mediative role of cultural threat was not confirmed in the present study.

General Information

Keywords: perceived threat, acculturation expectations, bonding social capital, bridging social capital, trust, ethnic tolerance, Estonia

Journal rubric: Empirical Research

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2021170408

Funding. The reported study was funded by Russian Science Foundation (RSF), project number 20-18-00268.

For citation: Rodionov G.Y. The Relationship Between Social Capital and Acculturation Expectations of Estonians in Estonia: Perceived Threat as a Mediator. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2021. Vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 74–82. DOI: 10.17759/chp.2021170408.

References

  1. Statistics Estonia [electronic resource]. URL: https:// www.stat.ee/et/avasta-statistikat/valdkonnad/rahvastik/ rahvaarv (accessed 30.05.2021).
  2. Lebedeva N.M., Tatarko A.N. Sravnitel’nyi analiz strategii vzaimodeistviya migrantov i naseleniya Rossii v Moskve i Stavropol’skom krae [Comparative analysis of the strategies of interaction between migrants and the population of Russia in Moscow and the Stavropol Territory] Strategii mezhkul’turnogo vzaimodeistviya migrantov i prinimayushchego naseleniya = Strategies for intercultural interaction between migrants and the host population. Moscow: RUDN, 2009. Pp. 336—375. (In Russ.).
  3. Putnam R. Чтобы демократия сработала. Гражданские традиции в современной Италии. Chtoby demokratiya srabotala. Grazhdanskiye traditsii v sovremennoy Italii [For democracy to work. Civil traditions in modern Italy]. Moscow, 1996. 288 p.
  4. Tatarko A.N. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskii kapital lichnosti v polikul’turnom obshchestve [Socio-psychological capital of the individual in a multicultural society]. Мoscow: Institut Psikhologii Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk [Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 2014. 384 p.
  5. Tatarko A.N., Lepshokova Z.K., Dubrov D.I. et al. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskii kapital lichnosti i akkul’turatsionnye ozhidaniya (na primere zhitelei Moskvy) [Socio-psychological capital of the individual and acculturation expectations (on the example of Moscow residents)]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ = Social sciences and modernity, 2018. No. 4., pp. 76—88.
  6. Allport G.W. The Nature of Prejudice. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1954.
  7. Berry J.W. Contexts of Acculturation. Immigrant Youth in Cultural Transition. Berry J.W., Phinney L.S., Sam D.L., Vedder P. M. (Eds.) N.Y.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2006. Pp. 27—42.
  8. Cao C., Meng Q. Chinese university students’ mediated contact and global competence: Moderation of direct contact and mediation of intergroup anxiety. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2020. Vol. 72, pp. 58—68. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2020.03.002
  9. Florack A., Bless H., Piontkowski U. When do people accept cultural diversity? International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2003. Vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 627—640. DOI: 10.1016/j. ijintrel.2003.08.003
  10. Jun H. J., Ha S.K. Social capital and assimilation of migrant workers and foreign wives in South Korea: The case of Wongok community. Habitat International, 2015. Vol. 47, pp. 126—135. DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.01.013
  11. Häuberer J. Social Capital Theory: Towards a Methodological Foundation. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2011. 330 p.
  12. Manevska K., Achterberg P. Immigration and Perceived Ethnic Threat: Cultural Capital and Economic Explanations. European Sociological Review, 2013. Vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 437—449.
  13. Meuleman B., Davidov E., Billiet J. Changing attitudes toward immigration in Europe, 2002—2007: a dynamic group conflict theory approach. Social Science Research, 2009. Vol. 38, pp. 352—365. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.09.006
  14. Olzak S. The Dynamics of Ethnic Competition and Conflict. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992. 288 p.
  15. Pettigrew, T. Normative theory in intergroup relations: Explaining both harmony and conflict. Psychology and Developing Societies, 1991. Vol. 3 no. 1, pp. 3—16. DOI: 10.1177/097133369100300102
  16. Pettigrew T.F. Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 1998. Vol. 49, pp. 65—86.
  17. Putnam, R.D. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster. 2000.
  18. Putnam R.D. E Pluribus Unum: diversity and community in the twenty-first century. The 2006 Johan Skytte prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 2007. Vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 137—174. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x
  19. Stephan W.G., Stephan C.W. An Integrated Threat Theory of Prejudice. S. Oscamp (Eds.). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2000. Pp. 225—246.
  20. Tatarko A.N., Berry J.W.,Choi K. Social capital, acculturation attitudes, and sociocultural adaptation of migrants from central Asian republics and South Korea in Russia. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2020. Vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 302—312.
  21. Van Der Gaag M.P.J. Measurement of individual social capital. PhD Thesis. University of Groningen, 2005. URL: http://irs.ub.rug.nl/ppn/275106985.
  22. Vetik R., Helemäe J. The Russian Second Generation in Tallinn and Kohtla-Järve: The TIES Study in Estonia. Amsterdam University Press, 2011. 250 p.
  23. Vetik R. Ethnic Conflict and Accommodation in Post- Communist Estonia. Journal of Peace Research, 1993. Vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 271—280.
  24. Yakobov E., Jurchik T., Solopieieva-Jurcikova I. et al. Expectations and acculturation: Further unpacking of adjustment mechanisms within the Russian-Speaking community in Montreal. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2019. Vol. 68, pp. 67—76. DOI: 10.1016/j. ijintrel.2018.11.001
  25. Yamagishi T. Trust and Social Intelligence. The evolutionary Game of Mind and Society. Tokyo: Tokyo University Press, 1998. Pp. 107—171. DOI: 10.1007/978-4- 431-53936-0

Information About the Authors

Germogen Y. Rodionov, PhD Student, Centre for Sociocultural Research, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1113-1810, e-mail: grodionov@hse.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 381
Previous month: 20
Current month: 3

Downloads

Total: 199
Previous month: 6
Current month: 1