Dependence of psychophysical equations on the chosen system of measure units

This study is dedicated to the verification of the assumption that the functions obtained in the psychophysical experiment, depending on the system of units chosen to represent the magnitude of physical stimulus.

1. Fechner G. T. Elemente der Psychophysik. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Hartel, I860.
2. Hawkes G. R. Cutaneous communication: Absolute identification of electrical intensity // Journal of Psychology. 1960. № 49. P. 203–212.
3. Kranz D. H., Luce R. D., Suppes P., Tversky A. Foundations of measurement. New York: Academic Press. 1971.
4. Myers A. K. Psychological scaling and scales of physical stimulus measurement // Psychological bulletin. 1982. V. 92. № 1. P. 203–214.
5. Stevens S. S. Mathematics, measurement, and psychophysics // Handbook of experimental psychology / Ed. S. S. Stevens. New York: Wiley, 1951.
6. Stevens S. S. On the psychophysical law // Psychological Review. 1957. №. 64. P. 153–181.
7. Stevens S. S. Decibels of light and sound // Physics Today. 1959 a. V. 8. № 10. P. 12–17.
8. Stevens S. S. Cross-modality validation of subjective scales for loudness, vibration and electric shock // Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1959 b. № 57. P. 201–245.
9. Stevens S. S. Tactile vibration: Dynamics of sensory intensity // Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1959 с. № 57. P. 210–218.
10. Stevens S. S. The psychophysics of sensory function. Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1961.
11. Stevens S. S., Galanter E. H. Ratio scales and category scales for dozen perceptual continua // Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1957. № 54. P. 377–411.