Experimental Psychology (Russia)
2014. Vol. 7, no. 4, 83–99
ISSN: 2072-7593 / 2311-7036 (online)
Individual differences in the process of object-oriented comparison
Abstract
General Information
Keywords: similarity, individual differences, verbalization
Journal rubric: Psychology of Personality
Article type: scientific article
For citation: Samoylenko E.S., Melkumyan T.A. Individual differences in the process of object-oriented comparison. Eksperimental'naâ psihologiâ = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2014. Vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 83–99. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
References
- Bassok M., Medin D. L. Birds of a feather flock together: Similarity judgments with semantically rich stimuli. Journal of Memory and Language, 1997, vol. 36, pp. 311–336.
- Buunk A. P., Gibbons F.X. Social comparison orientation: a new perspective on those who do and those who don't compare with others. In Guimond S. (ed.), Social Comparison and Social Psychology: Understanding cognition, inter-group relations and culture. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 15-32.
- Dunham P., Dunham F. Developmental antecedents of taxonomic and thematic strategies at 3 years of age. Developmental Psychology, 1995, vol. 31, pp. 483–493.
- Estes Z. A tale of two similarities: Comparison and integration in conceptual combination. Cognitive Science, 2003, vol. 27, pp. 911–921.
- Estes Z., Golonka S., Jones L.L. Thematic Thinking: The Apprehension and Consequences of Thematic Relations. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 2011, vol. 54, pp. 249-294.
- Estes Z., Hasson U. The importance of being nonalignable: A critical test of the structural alignment theory of similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2004, vol. 30, pp. 1082–1092.
- Gentner D., Brem S. K. Is snow really similar to a shovel? Distinguishing similarity from thematic relatedness. Proc. of the 21st annual conf. of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999, pp. 179–184.
- Gentner D., Markman A. B. Structural alignment in comparison: No difference without similarity. Psychological Science, 1994, vol. 5, pp. 152-158.
- Gentner D., Markman A. B. Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 1997, vol. 52, pp. 45–56.
- Gibbons F.X., Buunk A.P. Individual differences in social comparison: development and validation of a measure of social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 129–142.
- Golonka S., Estes Z. Thematic Relations Affect Similarity Via Commonalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2009, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1454-1464.
- Hemphill K.J., Lehman D.R. Social comparisons and their affective consequences: The importance of comparison dimension and individual difference variables. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1991, vol. 10, pp. 372-394.
- Landis D., Silver C.A., Jones J. M., Messick S. Level of proficiency and multidimensional viewpoints about problem similarity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1967 vol. 51, pp. 216-222.
- Markman A. B., Gentner D. Splitting the difference: A structural alignment view of similarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 1993a, vol. 32, pp. 517-535.
- Markman A. B., Gentner D. Structural alignment during similarity comparisons. Cognitive Psychology, 1993b, vol. 25, pp. 431-467.
- Markman A. B., Gentner D. Structure mapping in the comparison process. American Journal of Psychology, 2000, vol. 113, pp. 501–538.
- Nosulenko V.N. Psychkophysika vospriyatiya estestvennoj sredy [Psychophysics of perception of natural environment]. Moscow, Institut psihologii RAN, 2007. 400 p. (in Russ.).
- Nosulenko V.N., Samoylenko E.S. Verbalnyj metod v izuchenii vospriyatiya izmenenij v okrujayuschej srede [Verbal method in investigation of perception of changes in environment]. In Nosulenko V.N., Epifanov E.G., Savchenko T.V. (eds.), Psykhologiya i okrujayuschaya sreda [Psychology and environment], Moscow, Institut psihologii RAN, 1995, pp. 13-59. (in Russ.).
- O’Hare D. Individual differences in perceived similarity and preference for visual art: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 1976, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 445-452.
- Petrenko V.F. Mnogomernoe soznanie. Psykhosemanticheskaya paradigma [Multidimensional consciousness. Psychosemantic paradigm]. Moscow, EKSMO, 2014. 440 p. (in Russ.).
- Samoylenko E.S. Problemy sravneniya v psykhologicheskom issledovanii [Problems of comparison in psychological research]. Moscow, Institut psihologii RAN, 2010. 416 p.
- Samoylenko E.S. Process sravneniya v systemakh poznaniya, obscheniya i lichnosti. Diss. dokt. psikhol. nauk [Process of comparison in systems of cognition, communication and personality. Dr. Sci. (Psychology) thesis]. Moscow, 2012. 523p. (In Russ.).
- Samoylenko E.S., Melkumyan T.A. Sravnenie skhodnykh zritelnykh obektov v razlichnykh kontekstakh ikh predyavleniya [Comparison of similar visual objects in different contexts of their presentation]. Eksperimentalnaya psykhologiya [Experimental Psychology (Russia)], 2011, no.3, pp. 42-58. (In Russ.; abstr. in Engl.).
- Simmons S., Estes Z. Individual differences in the perception of similarity and difference. Cognition, 2008, vol. 108, pp. 781-795.
- Strauss A., Corbin J. M. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London, Sage Publication, 1990. 270 p.
- Tversky A. Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 1977, vol. 84, pp. 327–352.
- Waxman S. R., Namy L. L. Challenging the notion of a thematic preference in young children. Developmental Psychology, 1997, vol. 33, pp. 555–567.
- Wisniewski E. J., Bassok M. What makes a man similar to a tie? Stimulus compatibility with comparison and integration. Cognitive Psychology, 1999, vol. 39, pp. 208–238.
Information About the Authors
Metrics
Views
Total: 2892
Previous month: 24
Current month: 4
Downloads
Total: 788
Previous month: 3
Current month: 1