Cognitive control and a sense of presence in virtual environments

2299

Abstract

User interaction with a virtual reality system may be accompanied with a sense of presence, the illusion of reality of virtual environment. The emergence of a sense of presence is determined by both technological and psychological factors. The authors show that a sense of presence may depend on the individual characteristics of cognitive control, i.e. the system of metacognition providing cognitive system setting on the solution of specific problems in context. It was found that the expression of a feeling of presence may depend on the efficiency of the control switch functions, interference suppression and updating of working memory. At the same time, the dependence of the severity of the sense of presence on the effectiveness of cognitive control differs in virtual environments with different levels of immersion.

General Information

Keywords: virtual reality, sense of presence, cognitive control, switching between tasks, interference suppression, working memory update

Journal rubric: Cognitive Psychology

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2016090102

For citation: Velichkovsky B.B., Gusev A.N., Vinogradova V.F., Arbekova O.A. Cognitive control and a sense of presence in virtual environments. Eksperimental'naâ psihologiâ = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2016. Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 5–20. DOI: 10.17759/exppsy.2016090102. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Averbukh N. V. Psikhologicheskije aspekty fenomena prisutstvija v virtualnoj srede [Psychological as­pects of phenomenon of presence in a virtual environment], Vopmsy Psikhologii [Issues of Psychology], 2010, no. 5, pp. 105-113 (In Russ.).
  2. Dobychina N. V. Ontologija virtual’nogo prostranstva: informatsija, simvol, gipetekst [Ontology of vir­tual space: information, symbol, hypertext]. Sovremennyjepmblemy nauki i obrazovanija [Modem issues in science and education], 2013, no. 2, p. 468 (In Russ.)
  3. Jancke L., Cheetham М., Baumgartner Т. Virtual reality and the role of the prefrontal cortex in adults and children. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2009, vol. 3, pp. 52-59.
  4. Lessiter J., Freeman J., Keogh E., Davidoff J. A cross-media presence questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 2001, vol. 10, pp. 282-297.
  5. Lorist М. М., Boksem М., Ridderinkhof K. Impaired cognitive control and reduced cingulate activity during mental fatigue. Cognitive Brain Research, 2005, vol. 24, pp. 199-205.
  6. Miyake A., Friedman N., Emerson М., Witzki A., Howerter A., Wager T. The unity and diversity of execu­tive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 2000, vol. 41, pp. 49-100.
  7. Notebaert W., Verguts T. Cognitive control acts locally. Cognition, 2008, vol. 106, pp. 1071-1080.
  8. Rogers R., Monsell S. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks.Joumal of Experimen­tal Psychology. General, 1995, vol. 124, pp. 207-231.
  9. Sacau A., Laarni J., Hartmann T. Influence of individual factors on presence. Computers in Human Behav­ior, 2008, vol. 24, pp. 2255-2273.
  10. Sas C. Individual differences in virtual environments. Computational science - ICCS 2004, fourth in­ternational conference, proceedings, Part III. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2004, vol. 3038, pp. 1017­1024.
  11. Thomson C., Goldiez B., Huy L. Predicting presence: Constmcting the tendency toward presence in­ventory. InternationalJournal of Human-Computer Studies, 2009, vol. 67, pp. 62-78.
  12. Velichkovsky В. B. Vozmozhnosti kognitivnoj trenirovki kak sredstva korrektsii vozrastnykh izmenenij kognitivnogo controlja [Cognitive training as a means of correction of age-related changes in cognitive control]. Experimentalnaja Psikhologija [Experimental Psychology (Russia)], 2009, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 67-91 (In Russ.; abstr. in Engl.)
  13. Voyskunskiy A. E., Kukshinov E. Yu. Sotsial’noje prisutstvije v virtuaPnom okmzhenii [Social presence in the virtual environment]. In T. P. Skripkina (ed.), Psikhologija obshenija i doverija: teorija ipraktika. Sbom- ik materialov mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii URAO, PI RAO, MGU. 6-7 nojabrja 2014 [Psychology of communi­cation and trust: Theory and Practice: Materials of the International Conference URAO, PI RAO, Moscow State University (November 6-7,2014)]. Moscow, Universitet RAO Publ., 2014, pp. 678-681 (In Russ.)
  14. Voyskunskiy A. E., Menshikova G. Ya. О primenenii system virtual’noj real’nosti v psikhologii [On the application of virtual reality systems in psychology], Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Serija 14. Psikhologija [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 14. Psychology], 2008, no. 1, pp. 22-36 (In Russ.)
  15. Witmer B., Singer M. Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence, 1998, vol. 7, pp. 225-240.

Information About the Authors

Boris B. Velichkovsky, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Chair of Methodology of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Professor, Chair of General Psychology, Moscow Institute of Psychoanalysis, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7823-0605, e-mail: velitchk@mail.ru

Alexey N. Gusev, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Chair of Personality Psychology, Department of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9299-7092, e-mail: angusev@mail.ru

V. F. Vinogradova, Student, Department of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: vvfedorovna@gmail.com

Olga A. Arbekova, PhD in Psychology, psychologist, Regional non-profit social organization “Center for Curative Pedagogics” (CCP) “Special childhood”, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3628-3981, e-mail: inventa17151@gmail.com

Metrics

Views

Total: 6617
Previous month: 51
Current month: 21

Downloads

Total: 2299
Previous month: 6
Current month: 2