Categorical effects of color perception in central and peripheral fields of view

This article is devoted to research of the categorical color perception in different parts of the visual field as a part of the general problem of linguistic determination of color perception. The main hypothesis is that the change in visual angle at the presentation of color stimuli influences the categorical effects of color perception. The study included 60 children. The basic experimental procedure was carried out in computer program based on the visual search paradigm. We compared time of the between- and within-category color distinction at three conditions of the visual angle in three different color diapasons. The results showed that the categorical effects of color perception occur when the stimuli locate in the field of clear vision (5°). Categorical effects disappeared when value of retinal declination was 15 or 25°. The results show decrease of total reaction time with increasing values of the visual angle, i.e. the speed of reaction was faster when color stimuli appeared in peripheral vision. Additional we have studied the presence of categorical effects in border and focal colors. The study showed that categorical effects occur only at border colors in the field of clear vision. We have seen no categorical effect at the focal colors regardless of visual angle.

1. Barabanshchikov V.A., Zhegallo A.V. Raspoznavanie ekspressii litsa v blizhnei periferii zritel'nogo polya [Recognition of the face expressions in near periphery of the visual field]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental psychology], 2013, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 58–83. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
2. Boguslavskaya V.F. Psikhofiziologicheskie i psikhologicheskie kharakteristiki detei 6-7 let s razlichnoi stepen’yu gotovnosti k obucheniyu v shkole. Diss. kand. psichol. nauk [Psychophysiological and psychological characteristics of children of 6-7 years with varying degrees of readiness for school. PhD. Sci. (Psychology) diss.]. Rostov-na-Donu, 2000. 114 p. (In Russ.).
3. Bruner D. Psikhologiya poznaniya: za predelami neposredstvennoi informatsii [Psychology of cognition: beyond the immediate information]. Moscow: Progress, 1977. 412 p. (In Russ.).
4. Butorina A.V., Nikolaeva A.Yu., Stroganova T.A., Shtyrov Yu.Yu. Funktsional'noe kartirovanie rechevykh zon mozga cheloveka: perspektivy ispol'zovaniya metoda magnitoentsefalografii (MEG) [Functional mapping of speech areas of the brain of man: the prospects of using the method of magnetoencephalography.]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya [Modern foreign psychology], 2012, no. 1, pp. 103–114 (In Russ.).
5. Goncharov O.A., Knyazev N.N. Yazykovye i vozrastnye aspekty kategorial'nogo vospriyatiya tsveta [Language and age aspects of categorical perception of color]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural- historical psychology], 2012, no. 3, pp. 40–48 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
6. Goncharov O.A., Romanov S.G. Kategorial’nye effekty razlicheniya tsvetov. Chast’ 1. Lingvisticheskii aspekt [Categorical effects distinguish colors. Part 1. The linguistic aspect.]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal Mezhdunarodnogo Universitetaprirody, obshchestvaicheloveka“Dubna” [Psychological journal of International University of nature, society and man “Dubna”], 2013, no. 2, pp. 25–41. Available at: www.psyanima.ru/jour nal/2013/2/2013n2a2/2013n2a2.pdf (Accessed: 15.07.2014) (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
7. Dvoryanchikova A.P. Sensomotornaya reaktsiya v raspoznavanii tsvetovogo  i  yarkostnogo  kontrasta: diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. [Sensorimotor reaction in the detection of colour and luminance contrast. Phd. Sci. (Psychology) diss.]. Moscow, 2003. 126 p.
8. Zhegallo A.V. Temperamental'nye prediktory kategorial'nosti vospriyatiya ekspressii litsa [Temperamental predictors of categoriality in the perception of facial expressions]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental Psychology], 2009, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 67–77 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
9. Ivens R.M. Vvedenie v teoriyu tsveta [Introduction to color theory]. Moscow: Mir, 1964. 342 p. (In Russ).
10. Kotov A.A. Sovremennye dannye o vliyanii rechevykh znakov na formirovanie ponyatii v rannem detstve [Current data on the impact of speech signs on the formation of concepts in early childhood]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya [Modern foreign psychology], 2013, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 19–28 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
11. Kurakova O.A. Effekt kategorial'nosti vospriyatiya: osnovnye podkhody i psikhofizicheskie modeli [The effect of categoriality of perception: the main approaches and psychophysical models]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental psychology], 2013, vol. 6, no. 1. pp. 61–75 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
12. Landsberg G.S. Optika [Optics]. M.: Nauka, 1976. 928 p. (In Russ).
13. Mukhina V.S. Izobrazitel’naya deyatel’nost’ rebenka kak forma usvoeniya sotsial’nogo opyta [Graphic activity of the child as a form of assimilation of social experience]. M.: Pedagogika, 1981. 240 p. (In Russ).
14. Nosulenko V.N. Psikhofizika vospriyatiya estestvennoi sredy. Problema vosprinimaemogo kachestva [Psychophysics of perception of the natural environment. The problem of perceived quality]. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2007. 400 p. (In Russ).
15. Romanov S.G. Osobennosti kategorial'nogo vospriyatiya pogranichnykh i fokal'nykh tsvetov [Features of categorical perception of border and focal colors]. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov po materialam mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, «Sovremennye  tendentsii  v  obrazovanii  i  nauke» (g. Rostоv-na-Donu, 28 noyabrya 2014 g.) [Collection of scientific works on materials of the international scientific - practical conference «Modern Trends in Education and Science»]. Rostov-on-Don: Publ. Konsaltingovaya kompaniya «Yukom», 2014. pp. 106–108 (In Russ.).
16. Smirnov N. V., Dunin-Barkovskii I. V. Kurs teorii veroyatnostei i matematicheskoi statistiki dlya tekhnicheskikh prilozhenii [The course of the theory of probability and mathematical statistics for technical applications]. M.: Nauka, 1965. 512 p. (In Russ.).
17. Tereshchenko T.V., Goncharov O.A. Kategorial’noe  razlichenie  fokal’nykh  i  pogranichnykh  tsvetov pri nalichii interferiruyushchikh stimulov [A categorical distinction between focal and border colors in the presence of interfering stimuli]. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii, «Psikhologiya XXI veka: akademicheskoe proshloe i budushchee» (g. Moskva, 20–23 aprelya 2015 g.) [Materials of international scientific conference «Psychology of the XXI century: the academic past and future»]. Sankt-Peterburg: Publ. Skifiya-print, 2015. pp. 196–198 (In Russ.).
18. Sheffe G. Dispersionnyi analiz [Variance analysis]. M.: 1963, 512 p. (In Russ.).
19. Shiffman H.R. Oshchushchenie i vospriyatie [Sensation and perception]. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter, 2003. 928 p. (In Russ.).
20. Atchison D.A., Mathur A., Varnas S.R. Visual  performance  with  lenses  correcting  peripheral refractive errors. Optometry and Vision Science, 2013, vol. 90, no. 11, pp. 1304–1311. doi:10.1097/ OPX.0000000000000033
21. Berlin B., Kay P. Basic color terms: their universality and evolution. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1969.
22. Brown  A.M.,  Lindsey  D.T.,  Guckes  K.M.  Color  names,  color  categories,  and  color-cued  visual search: Sometimes, color perception is not categorical. Journal of vision, 2011, vol. 11, no. 12. pp. 1–21. doi:10.1167/11.12.2
23. Brown, R., Lenneberg, E. H. A study in language and cognition. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1954, vol. 49, pp. 454–462. doi: 10.1037/h0057814
24. Buck S.L., Knight R., Fowler G., Hunt B. Rod influence on hue-scaling functions. Vision Research, 1998, vol. 38, no. 21, pp. 3259–3263. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00436-7
25. Davies Ian R.L., MacDremid C., Corbett G., McGurk H., Jerrett D., Jerrett T., Sowden P. Color terms in Setswana. A linguistic and perceptual approach. Linguistics, 1992, vol. 30. no. 6, pp. 1065–1103.
26. Davies Ian R.L., Corbett G., Greville G. The basic color terms of Russian. Linguistics, 1994, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 65–89. doi: 10.1515/ling.1994.32.1.65
27. Edwards D.S., Goolkasian P.A. Periferal vision location and kinds of complex processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 244–249. doi:10.1037/h0035859
28. Gilbert A.L., Regier T., Kay P., Ivry R.B. Whorf hypothesis is supported in the right visual field but not the left. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 2006, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 489–494. doi:10.1073/pnas.0509868103
29. Greene M.R., Fei-Fei L. Visual categorization is automatic and obligatory: Evidence from Stroop-like paradigm. Journal of vision, 2014, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–11. doi:10.1167/14.1.14
30. Grill-Spector K., Kanwisher N. Visual recognition: As soon as you know it is there, you know what it is. Psychological Science, 2005, no. 16, pp. 152–160. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00796.x
31. Jraissati Y. Categorical perception of color: assessing the role of language. Croatian Journal of philosophy, 2012, vol. 12. no. 36, pp. 439–462.
32. Jraissati Y., Wakui E., Decock L., Douven I. Constraints of color category  formation.  International Studies in The Philosophy of Science, 2012, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 171–196.
33. Kay P., Kempton W. What  is  the  Sapir-Whorf  hypothesis?  American  Anthropologist,  1984,  no.  86, pp. 65–79. doi: 10.1525/aa.1984.86.1.02a00050
34. Kherif F., Josse G., Price C.J. Automatic top-down processing explains common left occipito-temporal responses to visual words and objects. Cerebral Cortex, 2011, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 103–114. doi: 10.1093/ cercor/bhq063
35. Liberman A.M., Harris K.S., Hoffman H.S., Griffith B.C. The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1958, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 358–368. doi: 10.1037/h0038297
36. Mack M.L., Palmeri T.J. Decoupling object detection and categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2010, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1067–1079. doi: 10.1037/a0020254
37. Nothdurft H.S. Focal attention in visual search. Vision Research, 1999, vol. 39, no. 14, pp. 2305–2310. doi:  10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00006-1
38. Paramei G.V. Singing the Russian blues: An argument for culturally basic color terms. Cross-Cultural Research, 2005, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 10–38. doi: 10.1177/1069397104267888
39. Pisoni D.B., Tash J. Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories. Perception and Psychophysics, 1974, vol. 15. no. 2, pp. 285–290. doi:10.3758/BF03213946
40. Polack J.D., Beaumont J., Arras C., Zekri M. Perceptive relevance of soundscape descriptors: a morpho- typological approach. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2008, vol. 123. no. 5, 3810 P. doi:10.1121/1.2935526
41. Rosch E., Lloyd B.B. Cognition and categorization. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1978.
42. Sutrop U. The Basic Colour Terms of Estonian. Trames, 2000, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 143–168.
43. Treisman A., Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 1980, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 97–136.
44. Uusküla M. The basic colour terms of Finnish. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 2007, no. 20, pp. 367–397.
45. Walther D.B., Caddigan E., Fei-Fei L., Beck D.M. Natural scene categories revealed in distributed patterns of activity in the human brain. The Journal of Neuroscience, 2009, vol. 29, no. 34, pp. 10573–10581. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0559-09.2009
46. Wang K., Hoosain R., Lee T.M.C., Meng Y., Fu J., Yang R. Perception of Six Basic Emotional Facial Expressions by the Chinese. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2006, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 623–629. doi:10.1177/0022022106290481
47. Winawer J., Witthoft N., Frank M.C., Wu L., Wade A.R., Boroditsky L. Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007, vol. 104, no. 19, pp. 7780–7785. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701644104
48. Witzel C., Gegenfurtner K.R. Categorical sensitivity to color differences. Journal of vision, 2013, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1–33. doi: 10.1167/13.7.1