Regularities of oculomotor activity of Russians and Tuvans in the assessment of perceptual confidence by facial expressions

512

Abstract

We present the results of search for regularities of oculomotor activity in the perception of faces that cause and do not cause confidence in representatives of Russian and Tuvan ethnic groups. Such characteristics of eye movements as the number of fixations and their total duration are ambiguously associated with the structure of the perceived person. It is not possible to identify the unambiguous direction of changes in the parameters of oculomotor activity as dependent on ethnic and racial affiliation of either subjects or posers.

General Information

Keywords: eye movements, fixation, ethnos, race, facial expression, perceptual confidence

Journal rubric: Face Science

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2017100410

For citation: Basiul I.A., Demidov A.A., Diveev D.A. Regularities of oculomotor activity of Russians and Tuvans in the assessment of perceptual confidence by facial expressions. Eksperimental'naâ psihologiâ = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2017. Vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 148–162. DOI: 10.17759/exppsy.2017100410. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Ananyeva K.I., Barabanschikov V.A., Kharitonov A.N. Izostaticheskiye patterny dvizheniy glaz pri vospriyatii chelovecheskogo litsa [Isostatic patterns of eyemovements in the perception of human face]. In Barabanschikov V.A. (ed), Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya v Rossii: traditsii i perspektivy [Experimental psychology in Russia. Traditions and prospects]. M., Izd-vo «Institut psikhologii RAN», 2010, pp. 195—200. (In Russ.).
  2. Ananyeva K.I., Basyul I.A., Demidov A.A. Kross-kul’turnye osobennosti dvizhenii glaz pri vospri­yatii lits raznykh ras [Cross-cultural peculiarities of eye-movements in the perception of different race faces]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental psychology, Russia], 2016, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 5—17. doi:10.17759/exppsy.2016090402 (In Russ.).
  3. Argyle M., Cook M. Gaze and mutual gaze. Cambridge, England, Cambridge University Press, 1976.
  4. Caldara R., Rossion B., Bovet P., Hauert C.-A. Event-related potentials and time course of the ‘other-race’face classification advantage. Neuroreport, 2004, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 905—910.
  5. Caulfield F., Ewing L., Burton N., Avard E., Rhodes G. Facial trustworthiness judgments in children with ASD are modulated by happy and angry emotional cues. PLoS ONE, 2014, vol. 9, no. 5.
  6. Dalmaso M., Galfano G., Castelli L. The impact of same- and other-race gaze distractors on the control of saccadic eye movements. Perception, 2015, vol. 44, no. 8—9, pp. 1020—1028.
  7. Diveev D.A., Demidov A.A. Mikrodinamika pertseptivnogo doveriya pri vospriyatii vyrazhenii litsa [Microdynamics of perceptual confidence in the perception of facial expressions]. Eksperimental’naya psik­hologiya [Experimental psychology], 2015, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 102—119. doi:10.17759/exppsy.2015080408 (In Russ.).
  8. Elfenbein H.A., Ambady N. Is there an in-group advantage in emotion recognition? Psychological Bulletin, 2002a, vol. 128, no. 2, pp. 243—249.
  9. Elfenbein H.A., Ambady N. On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 2002b, vol. 128, no. 2, pp. 203—235.
  10. Meissner C.A., Brigham J.C. Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: a meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2001, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 3—35.
  11. Nichols K.A., Champness B.G. Eye gaze and the GSR. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1971, vol. 7, pp. 623—626.
  12. Pavan G., Dalmaso M., Galfano G., Castelli L. Racial group membership is associated to gaze-mediated orienting in Italy. PLoS ONE, 2011, vol. 6, pp. 10.
  13. Singer T., Kiebel S.J., Winston J.S., Dolan R.J., Frith C.D. Brain responses to the acquired moral status of faces. Neuron, 2004, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 653—662.
  14. Willis J., Todorov A. First Impressions: Making Up Your Mind After a 100-Ms Exposure to a Face. Psychological Science, 2006, vol. 17, no. 7.
  15. Yarbus A.L. Rol’ dvizheniy glaz v protsesse zreniya [The role of eyemovements in the process of vision]. M., Nauka, 1965. (In Russ.).

Information About the Authors

Ivan A. Basiul, Junior Researcher. Laboratory of Cognitive Processes and Mathematical Psychology, Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Lecturer of the Department of General Psychology, Moscow Institute of Psychoanalysis, Research laboratory assistant, Institute of Experimental Psychology of MSPPU, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3153-2096, e-mail: basul@inbox.ru

Alexander A. Demidov, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Department of General Psychology, Moscow Institute of Psychoanalysis, Senior Researcher at the Institute of Experimental Psychology, MSUPE, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6660-5761, e-mail: demidov@inpsycho.ru

Dmitry A. Diveev, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor of the Department of General Psychology, Moscow Institute of Psychoanalysis, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2826-4185, e-mail: diveev2@gmail.com

Metrics

Views

Total: 2675
Previous month: 13
Current month: 6

Downloads

Total: 512
Previous month: 2
Current month: 2