Skip to Main Content

Experimental Psychology (Russia)
2019. Vol. 12, no. 3, 119–134
doi:10.17759/exppsy.2019120309
ISSN: 2072-7593 / 2311-7036 (online)

Object working memory load and perceptual similarity in visual search for multiple targets

680

K.S. Kozlov, E.S. Gorbunova

PDF (RUS)
Online translation in english
GS
Information
in Google Scholar

Abstract

Subsequent search misses can occur during visual search for several targets. SSM is a decrease in accuracy at finding a second target after successful detection of a first one. Two experiments investigated the effect of object working memory load, target stimuli similarity and the similarity of stimuli in visual search task and working memory tasks on the SSM. It was found that targets perceptual similarity is significant, as well as memory load in case of working memory task and visual search task stimuli similarity. In addition, we found a significant interaction between working memory load and number of shared features between two target stimuli, which may indicate a common mechanism underlying the role of working memory load and perceptual similarity factors.

General Information

Keywords: visual search, subsequent search misses, working memory

Journal rubric: Cognitive Psychology

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2019120309

Funding. The study was carried out as part of the HSE Program of Fundamental Studies in 2019.

For citation: Kozlov K.S., Gorbunova E.S. Object working memory load and perceptual similarity in visual search for multiple targets. Eksperimental'naâ psihologiâ = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2019. Vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 119–134. DOI: 10.17759/exppsy.2019120309. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Adamo S.H., Cain M.S., & Mitroff S.R. (2016). An individual differences approach to multiple-target visual search errors: How search errors relate to different characteristics of attention. Vision research, 141, 258—265.
  2. Adamo S.H., Cain M.S., & Mitroff S.R. (2013). Self-induced attentional blink: A cause of errors in multiple-target search. Psychological science, 24 (12), 2569—2574.
  3. Adamo S.H., Cain M.S., & Mitroff S.R. (2015). Targets need their own personal space: Effects of clutter on multiple-target search accuracy. Perception, 44(10), 1203—1214.
  4. Berbaum K.S., Franken J.E., Dorfman D.D., Rooholamini S.A., Coffman C.E., Cornell S.H., ... & Kao S.C. (1991). Time course of satisfaction of search. Investigative radiology, 26(7), 640—648.
  5. Berbaum K.S., Franken J.E., Dorfman D.D., Rooholamini S.A., Kathol M.H., Barloon T.J., ... & El-khoury G.Y. (1990). Satisfaction of search in diagnostic radiology. Investigative radiology, 25(2), 133—140.
  6. Cain M.S., Adamo S.H., & Mitroff S.R. (2013). A taxonomy of errors in multiple-target visual search. Visual Cognition, 21(7), 899—921.
  7. Cain M.S., Dunsmoor J.E., LaBar K.S., & Mitroff S.R. (2011). Anticipatory anxiety hinders detection of a second target in dual-target search. Psychological Science, 22(7), 866—871.
  8. Cain M.S., & Mitroff S.R. (2013). Memory for found targets interferes with subsequent performance in multiple-target visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(5), 1398.
  9. Dowd E.W., & Mitroff S.R. (2013). Attentional guidance by working memory overrides salience cues in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(6), 1786.
  10. Fleck M.S., Samei E., & Mitroff S.R. (2010). Generalized “satisfaction of search”: Adverse influences on dual-target search accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16(1), 60.
  11. Gorbunova E.S. (2017). Perceptual similarity in visual search for multiple targets. Acta psychologica, 173, 46—54.
  12. Gorbunova E., Kozlov K.S., Le S.T.T., & Makarov I.M. (2019). The role of Working Memory in Visual Search for Multiple Targets. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019, 10, 1—15.
  13. Woodman G.F., & Luck S.J. (2004). Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 11(2), 269—274.
  14. Woodman G.F., Vogel E.K., & Luck S.J. (2001). Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full. Psychological Science, 12(3), 219—224.

Information About the Authors

K. S. Kozlov, Research Assistant, Laboratory for Cognitive Psychology of Digital Interfaces User, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: kirillskozlov@gmail.com

Elena S. Gorbunova, PhD in Psychology, LAssociate Professor, Head of Laboratory of Cognitive Psychology of Digital Interfaces User, School of Psychology, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3646-2605, e-mail: gorbunovaes@gmail.com

Metrics

Views

Total: 1156
Previous month: 11
Current month: 4

Downloads

Total: 680
Previous month: 5
Current month: 1