The Relationship of the Social Needs of a Person and the Reasons Underlying the Decision to Become the Owner of a Pet

561

Abstract

The article presents data from a study whose purpose was to establish whether there is a connection between the needs of a person in communicating with other people and the reasons for which he gets a pet, and also to determine whether there are differences in interpersonal needs in people who voluntarily and happily become the owner of a home animal and those who do not see themselves as owners. To determine the main reasons underlying the interaction of humans with animals, an author’s questionnaire was developed. As a result of mathematical data processing, significant relationships were established between different types of social needs and the reasons for animal ownership. In addition, the differences between the social needs of those who cannot imagine their life without pets and those who do not see themselves as owners of animals were analyzed.

General Information

Keywords: Human-Animal Interaction, pets, social needs, psychological aspects of pet ownership

Journal rubric: Social Psychology

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2020130409

For citation: Doronina T.V., Arcishevskaya E.V. The Relationship of the Social Needs of a Person and the Reasons Underlying the Decision to Become the Owner of a Pet. Eksperimental'naâ psihologiâ = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2020. Vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 125–135. DOI: 10.17759/exppsy.2020130409. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Nikol’skaya A.V. Lyubov’ i svoboda v sisteme otnoshenij cheloveka i domashnih zhivotnyh. Filosofskie nauki. 2011;(10):90—104. (In Russ.).
  2. Varga A.YA., Fedorovich E.YU. Rol’ zhivotnyh—domashnih pitomcev pri prohozhdenii sem’ej normativnyh krizisov // Sbornik materialov VIII mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Ural’skij gosudarstvennyj pedagogicheskij universitet. 2018. S. 646—650. (In Russ.).
  3. Nikol’skaya A.V., Kostrigin A.A. Ocenka konvergentnoj i divergentnoj validnosti testa-oprosnika vladel’cev sobak, pred”yavlyayushchih zhaloby na neadekvatnoe povedenie pitomcev, ne demonstriruyushchih otklonyayushchegosya povedeniya // Eksperimental’naya psihologiya. 2019. Tom 12. № 2. S. 98—111. doi:10.17759/exppsy.2019120208. (In Russ.).
  4. Nikol’skaya A.V., Kostrigin A.A. Effektivnost’ ispol’zovaniya animaloterapii v kognitivno-povedencheskoj terapii: psihoterapevticheskie kejsy // Konsul’tativnaya psihologiya i psihoterapiya. 2019. T. 27. № 4. S. 149—164. doi: 10.17759/cpp.2019270410. (In Russ.).
  5. Nikol’skaya A.V., Kostrigin A.A. Vliyanie domashnih pitomcev na psihologicheskoe blagopoluchie vladel’cev s ogranichennymi vozmozhnostyami zdorov’ya // Voprosy psihologii. 2019. №3. S. 107—118. (In Russ.).
  6. Panov V.I. Ot V.A.Vagnera k mezhvidovoj psihologii: ekopsihologicheskie kontury//Evolyucionnaya i sravnitel’naya psihologiya v Rossii: tradicii i perspektivy/Pod red. A.N.Haritonova. M.: IP RAN, 2013. S. 27—36. (In Russ.).
  7. Rusakova I.V. ZHivotnye-kompan’ony v domohozyajstvah: osobennosti Rossii i Kitaya // Novaya znachimost’ sem’i i mezhpokolennyh otnoshenij dlya Rossii i Kitaya. — SPb.: Renome, 2018. S. 166—194. (In Russ.).
  8. Semenova I.P., Kachalkina O.A., Fedorovich E.YU. Ocenivanie hozyaevami semejnyh domashnih pitomcev v zavisimosti ot sobstvennogo emocional’nogo sostoyaniya // Sbornik materialov VIII muzhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Ural’skij gosudarstvennyj pedagogicheskij universitet. 2018. S. 651—657. (In Russ.).
  9. Trubicyna L.V., Moshkalo E.V. Mesto domashnih zhivotnyh v psihologicheskoj strukture sem’i // Voprosy psihologii. 2019 №5. S. 57—64. (In Russ.).
  10. SHukova G.V. Mezhvidovoe vzaimodejstvie cheloveka i domashnih zhivotnyh kak predmet ekopsihologicheskogo issledovaniya // Ekopsihologicheskie issledovaniya-3: Sbornik nauchnyh statej/Pod red. V.I.Panova. SPb.: Nestor-Istoriya, 2013. S. 76—109. (In Russ.).
  11. Beetz, A.; Uvnäs-Moberg, K.; Julius, H.; Kotrschal, K. Psychosocial and psychophysiological effects of human-animal interactions: The possible role of oxytocin. Front. Psychol. 2012, 3, 234.
  12. Bernstein P.L., Friedmann E., Malaspina A. Animal-Assisted Therapy Enhances Resident Social Interaction and Initiation in Long-Term Care Facilities// Anthrozoos: a multidisciplinary journal of the interactions of people & animals. 2000 Vol. 13(4). P. 213—224.
  13. Gadomski, A.M.; Scribani, M.B.; Krupa, N.; Jenkins, P.; Nagykaldi, Z.; Olson, A.L. Pet dogs and children’s health: Opportunities for chronic disease prevention? Prev. Chronic Dis. 2015, 12, 1—10.
  14. Gee, N.R.; Church, M.T.; Altobelli, C.L. Preschoolers make fewer errors on an object categorization task in the presence of a dog. Anthrozoös 2010, 23, 223—230.
  15. Gee, N.R.; De, M.; Riley, W.; Belcher, J.M.; Grabski, J.L. The presence of a therapy dog results in improved object recognition performance in preschool children. Anthrozoos 2012, 25, 289—300.
  16. Gee, N.R.; Harris, S.L.; Johnson, K.L. The role of therapy dogs in speed and accuracy to complete motor skills tasks for preschool children. Anthrozoös 2007, 20, 375—386.
  17. Hurley K.B. Development and Human-Animal Interaction // Human Development. 2014. Vol. 57. No. 1. www.karger.com/Article/FullText/357795. Data poslednego obrashcheniya 16.05.2014.
  18. Kaminski, M.; Pellino, T.; Wish, J. Play and pets: The physical and emotional impact of child-life and pet therapy on hospitalized children. Children’s Health Care 2002, 31, 321—335.
  19. Marian R. Banks, William A. Banks, The effects of group and individual animal-assisted therapy on loneliness in residents of long-term care facilities // Anthrozoos: a multidisciplinary journal of the interactions of people & animals. 2005. Vol. 18(4). P. 396—408.
  20. Melson, G.F. Principles for human-animal interaction research. In How Animals Affect Us: Examining the Influence of Human-Animal Interaction on Child Development and Human Health; McCardle, P.M.S., Griffin, J.A., Maholmes, V., Eds.; American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
  21. Mueller M.K. The Relationship between Types of Human—Animal Interaction and Attitudes about Animals: An Exploratory Study // Anthrozoos: A Multidisciplinary Journal of The Interactions of People & Animals. 2014, Vol. 27. No. 2. P. 295—308.
  22. O’Haire M.E. Animal-assisted intervention for autism spectrum disorder: a systematic literature review. J Autism Dev Disord. 2013;43(7):1606—1622. .
  23. O’Haire, M.E.; Slaughter, V.; McKenzie, S.J.; McCune, S. Effects of animal-assisted activities with guinea pigs in the primary school classroom. Anthrozoös, 2013, 26, 445—458.
  24. Paul E.C., Serpell J.A. Obtaining a new pet dog: Effects of middle childhood children and their families // Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 1996. VoL 47. P. 17—29.
  25. Rhoades, H.; Winetrobe, H.; Rice, E. Pet ownership among homeless youth: Associations with mental health, service utilization and housing status. Child Psychiatry Hum. Dev. 2015, 46, 237—244.
  26. Seung Min Baek, Yaelim Lee, Kyeong Yae Sohng The psychological and behavioural effects of an animal assisted therapy programme in Korean older adults with dementia. Psychogeriatrics. 2020, https://doi. org/10.1111/psyg.12554.
  27. Tepfer, A.; Ross, S.; MacDonald, M.; Udell, M.A.R.; Ruaux, C.; Baltzer, W. Family Dog-Assisted Adapted Physical Activity: A Case Study. Animals 2017, 7, 35.
  28. Triebenbacher S.L. The relationship between attachment to companion animals and self-esteem: A developmental perspective / S.L. Triebenbacher // Companion Animals in Human Health / Cindy C. Wilson, Dennis C. Turner. — C.C.W.D.C., Ed.; SAGE Publications Ltd.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1998. Ch. 8. P. 135—148.

Information About the Authors

Tatyana V. Doronina, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Department of General Psychology, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4680-4461, e-mail: doroninatv@mgppu.ru

Elena V. Arcishevskaya, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Department of General Psychology, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3825-0227, e-mail: arcishevskayaev@mgppu.ru