Experimental Psychology (Russia)
2021. Vol. 14, no. 1, 64–79
doi:10.17759/exppsy.2021140101
ISSN: 2072-7593 / 2311-7036 (online)
Estimation of Line Orientation Depends on the Set of Additional Images
Abstract
General Information
Keywords: lines orientation discrimination, influence of context, tilt illusion, repulsion effect, attraction effect, vision acuity
Journal rubric: Psychology of Perception
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2021140101
Funding. This study was supported by the Program of Fundamental Scientific Research of State Academies for 2013—2020 (GP-14, section 63)
Acknowledgements. The authors are grateful in conducting the experiments to the employees of the laboratory of information technologies and mathematical modeling
For citation: Chikhman V.N., Bondarko V.M. Estimation of Line Orientation Depends on the Set of Additional Images. Eksperimental'naâ psihologiâ = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2021. Vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 64–79. DOI: 10.17759/exppsy.2021140101. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
References
- Bondarko V.M. Illusia naklona I orientazionnaya chuvstvitel`nost` // Fiziologiya cheloveka. 2020. Т. 46. № 2. s. 25—34. (in Russ.).
- Bondarko V.M., Danilova M.V. Svyaz’ krauding-effekta s funktsionirovaniem vysokochastotnykh prostranstvennykh elementov // Sensornye sistemy. 2002. T. 16. N 2. S. 89—99. (in Russ.).
- Bondarko V.M., Semenov L.А. Vliyanie kontexta na razlichenie orientacii linij // Sensornye sistemy. 2011. Т.25. № 3. S. 257—263. (in Russ.).
- Glezer V.D. Zrenie i myshlenie. L.: Nauka, 1985. 300 s. (in Russ.).
- Shevelev I.A. Zritel’naya kora // Fiziologiya zreniya / Red. A.L. Byizov. M.: Nauka, 1992. С. 243—314. (in Russ.).
- Shelepin Yu.E. Orientazhionnaya izbiratel’noct’ i prostranstvenno-chastotnyie harakteristiki rezheptivnyih polei neironov zatylochnoi kory koshki // Neiroiziologiya. 1981a. T. 13. № 3. S. 227—232. (in Russ.).
- Shelepin Yu.E. Fil’trazhionnye svoistva rezheptivnyih polei neironov zritel’noi kory // Doklady AN SSSR. 1981b. T. 261. № 6. S. 1506—1509. (in Russ.).
- Andrews D. P. Perception of contour orientation in the central fovea //Vision Res. 1967. V. 7. P. 975— 1013.
- Blakemore C., Carpenter R.H.S., Georgeson M.A. Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the human visual system // Nature. 1970. V. 228. N 5266. P. 37—39.
- Bouma H., Andriessen J.J. Induced changes in the perceived orientation of line segments // Vision Res. 1970. V. 10. P. 333—349.
- Calvert J.E., Harris J.P. Spatial frequency and duration effect on the tilt illusion and orientation acuity // Vis. Res. 1988. V. 28. P. 1051—1059.
- Campbell F.W., Maffei L. The tilt aftereffect: A fresh look // Vision Res. 1971. V. 11. P. 833—844.
- Carpenter R.H.S., Blakemore C. Interaction between orientation in human vision // Exp. Brain Res. 1973. V. 18. P. 287—303.
- Corbett J.E., Handy T.C., Enns J.T. When do we know which way is up? The time course of orientation perception // Vision Res. 2009. V. 49. P. 28—37.
- Danilova M. V., Bondarko V. M. Foveal contour interactions and crowding effects // J. Vision. 2007. V. 7 (2). P. 1—18.
- Gibson J. J. Adaptation, after-effect, and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. II. Simultaneous contrast and the real restriction of the after-effect // J. Exp. Psychology. 1937. V. 20. P. 553—569.
- Gibson J. J., Radner M. Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines // J. Exp. Psychology. 1937. V. 20. P. 453—467.
- Gilbert C.D., Wiesel T.N. The influence of contextual stimuli on the orientation selectivity of cells in primary visual cortex of the cat // Vision Rec. 1990. V. 30. P. 1689—1701.
- Hamburger K., Hansen T., Gegenfurtner K.R. Geometric-optical illusions at isoluminance // Vision Res. 2007. V. 47. P. 3276—3285.
- Hubel D.H., Wiesel T.N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex // J. Physiol. 1962. V. 160. P.251—260.
- Hubel D.H., Weisel T.N. Sequence regularity and geometry of orientation columns in the monkey striate cortex // J. Comparative Neurology.1974. V. 158. P. 267—294.
- Magnussen S., Kurtenbach W. A test for contrast-polarity selectivity in the tilt aftereffect // Perception. 1979. V. 8. P. 523 — 528
- Mitchel D.E., Muir D. Does the tilt aftereffect occur in the oblique meridian? // Vision Res. 1976. V. 16. P. 609—613.
- Morgan M.J., Mason A.J.S., Baldassi S. Are there separate first-order and second-order mechanisms for orientation discrimination? // Vision Res. 2000. V. 40. P. 1751—1763.
- Over R., Broerse J., Crassini B. Orientation illusion and masking in central and peripheral vision // J. Exp. Psychol. 1972. V.96. P. 25—31.
- O’Toole B., Wenderoth P. The tilt illusion: Repulsion and attraction effects in the oblique meridian // Vision Res. 1977. V. 17. P. 367—374.
- Prinzmetal, W., Beck, D. M. The tilt-constancy theory of visual illusions // J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2001. V. 27. P. 206—217.
- Solomon J.A., Morgan M.J. Strong tilt illusions always reduce orientation acuity // Vision Res. 2009. V. 49. P. 819—824.
- Tolhurst D.J., Thompson P.G. Orientation illusions and aftereffects: Inhibition between channels // Vision Res. 1975. V. 15. P. 967—972.
- Wenderoth P., O´Connor T., Johnson S. The tilt illusion as a function of the relative and absolute lengths of test and inducing lines // Percept. Psychophys. 1986 V. 39. P. 339—345.
- Wilson H.R., Gelb D.J. Modified line element theory for spatial frequency and width discrimination // J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A. 1984. V. 1. P. 124—131.
- Wolfe J.M. Short test flashes produce large tilt aftereffects // Vision Res. 1984. V. 24. P. 1959—1964.
Information About the Authors
Metrics
Views
Total: 465
Previous month: 16
Current month: 5
Downloads
Total: 216
Previous month: 6
Current month: 1