Maasai Identify Male Altruists by Facial Appearance

In this experimental study, we continue investigating an association between facial morphology and individual psychological characteristics. The study was conducted in the population of Maasai (Ngorongoro, Tanzania) in two stages during field trips in 2016 and 2021. At the first stage, we collected anthropological photo portraits from 305 individuals (123 women and 182 men) and interviewed them to identify the propensity to help others. Six generalized morphed portraits of Maasai (men and women) were created based on individual propensity to help. At the second stage of the study, portraits were presented to 200 Maasai, men and women from the same population. The portraits were evaluated according to the degree of expression of four qualities: physical strength, proneness to help others, a "good friend", and self-confidence. The results of the study revealed that representatives of the same population are able to distinguish altruistic men by their facial shape. Men who were prone to provide assistance to others were perceived as physically stronger. No such association was found for female portraits. The results are interpreted from the standpoint of evolutionary psychology.

1. Butovskaya M.L., Butovskii R.O. Masai Tanzanii: problem ustojchivogo razvitiya na ohranyaemoj prirodnoj territorii Ngorongoro [The Maasai of Tanzania: problems of substantial development in the Ngorongoro conservation area]. Sibirskie istoricheskie issledovaniya [Siberian research], 2017. № 3. P. 221-251. DOI:10.17223/2312461X/17/12 (In Russ.)
2. Butovskaya M.L., Rostovtseva V.V. Evolyuciya al'truizma i kooperacii: biosocial'naya perspektiva [The evolution of altruism and cooperation: a biosocial perspective]. Moskva: URSS, 2021. 297 (In Russ.)
3. de Vaal' F. Istoki morali: v poiskah chelovecheskogo u primatov [The Origins of Morality: in Search of Humanity in Primates]. Moskva: ANF, 2014. 374 (In Russ.)
4. Rostovtseva V.V., Mezentseva A.A., Windhager S., Butovskaya M.L. Lico al'truista: eksperimental'noe issledovanie prosocial'nogo povedeniya i morfologii lica buryat yuzhnoj Sibiri [Altruistic face: experimental study of facial morphology and prosociality in Buryats of Southern Siberia]. Eksperimental'naya psihologiya [Experimental Psychology], 2021. Vol. 14. № 2. P. 85-100. DOI:10.17759/exppsy.2021140206 (In Russ.)
5. Rengem R. Paradoks dobrodeteli [The Paradox of Virtue]. Moscva: AST, 2022. 478 p. (In Russ.)
6. Heir B., Vuds V. Vyzhivaet samyj druzhelyubnyj [The friendliest survives]. Moskva: BOMBORA, 2022. 283 p. (In Russ.)
7. Apicella C.L., Silk J.B. The evolution of human cooperation. Current Biology, 2019. Vol. 29, no. 11, pp. R447-R450. DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2019.03.036
8. Baez S., Flichtentrei D., Prats M., Mastandueno R., Garcı´a A.M., Cetkovich M., et al.Men, women...who cares? A population based study on sex differences and gender roles in empathy and moral cognition. PLoS ONE, 2017. Vol. 12, no. 6, pp. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0179336
9. Butovskaya M.L., Windhager S., Karelin D., Mezentseva A., Schaefer K., & Fink B.Associations of physical strength with facial shape in an African pastoralist society, the Maasai of Northern Tanzania. Plos one, 2018. Vol. 13, no. 5, pp. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0197738
10. Butovskaya M.L., Mezentseva A., Mabulla A., Shackelford T.K., Schaefer K., Fink B., & Windhager S. Facial cues to physical strength increase attractiveness but decrease aggressiveness assessments in male Maasai of Northern Tanzania. Evolution and Human Behavior, 2022. Vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 115-121. DOI:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2021.11.006
11. Carré J.M., Morrissey M.D., Mondloch C.J., & McCormick C.M. Estimating aggression from emotionally neutral faces: Which facial cues are diagnostic? Perception, 2010. Vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 356-377. DOI:10.1068/p6543
12. Hare B. Survival of the friendliest: Homo sapiens evolved via selection for prosociality. Annual review of psychology, 2017. Vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 155-186. DOI:10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044201
13. Löffler C.S., & Greitemeyer T. Are women the more empathetic gender? The effects of gender role expectations. Current Psychology, 2023. No. 42, pp. 220-231. DOI:10.1007/s12144-020-01260-8
14. Mestre M.V., Samper P., Frías M.D., & Tur A.M. Are women more empathetic than men? A longitudinal study in adolescence. The Spanish journal of psychology, 2021. Vol.12, no. 1, pp. 76-83. DOI:10.1017/s1138741600001499
15. Rohlf F.J. The tps series of software. Hystrix, 2015. Vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1-4. DOI:10.4404/hystrix-26.1-11264
16. Rostovtseva V.V., Mezentseva A.A., & Butovskaya M.L. Perception of Emergent Leaders’ Faces and Evolution of Social Cheating: Cross-Cultural Experiments. Evolutionary Psychology, 2022. Vol. 20, no. 1, pp. DOI:10.1177/14747049221081733
17. Stirrat M., Perrett D.I. Valid facial cues to cooperation and trust: Male facial width and trustworthiness. Psychological science, 2010. Vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 349-354. DOI:10.1177/0956797610362647
18. Xu F., Wu D., Toriyama R., Ma F., Itakura S., Lee K. Similarities and differences in Chinese and Caucasian adults' use of facial cues for trustworthiness judgments. PLoS One, 2012. Vol. 7, no. 4, pp. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0034859
19. Windhager S., Schaefer K., Fink B. Geometric morphometrics of male facial shape in relation to physical strength and perceived attractiveness, dominance, and masculinity. American Journal of Human Biology, 2011. Vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 805-814. DOI:10.1002/ajhb.21219