Test method for assessing the emotional intelligence of adolescents (MSCEIT-YRV)

2125

Abstract

This paper contains a description of the task methodology for assessing the level of development of emotional intelligence in adolescents aged 10 to 18 years MSCEIT–YRV (Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test – Youth Research Version). The paper provides main data on the adaptation of the methodology to the Russian-speaking sample. Adaptation and psychometric testing of the methodology were carried out using data from 996 adolescents aged 10 to 18 years (430 boys and 566 girls, mean age 13,3 years). This methodology provides information on the general level of development of emotional intelligence, indicators of the Experiential and Strategic domains of emotional intelligence and scores for four abilities (identification of emotions, facilitation of thought, understanding emotions and emotion management). The main psychometric indicators of reliability and validity of MSCEIT-YRV meet the requirements of test standardization. The paper also describes gender and age differences in emotional intelligence, shows a comparison of normative samples for the English and Russian versions of the MSCEIT–YRV method.

General Information

Keywords: emotional intelligence, adolescents, emotional intelligence test, psychometric testing, cross-cultural comparisons

Journal rubric: General Psychology

Article type: review article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2021100407

Received: 26.04.2021

Accepted:

For citation: Sergienko E.A., Khlevnaya E.A., Kiseleva T.S. Test method for assessing the emotional intelligence of adolescents (MSCEIT-YRV) [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sovremennaia zarubezhnaia psikhologiia = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2021. Vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 73–84. DOI: 10.17759/jmfp.2021100407. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Sergienko E.A., Vetrova I.I. Russkoyazychnaya adaptatsiya testa Dzh. Meiera, P. Seloveya, D. Karuzo «Emotsional'nyi intellekt» (MSCEIT V2.0) [Russian-language adaptation of the test by J. Mayer, P. Salovey, D. Caruso "Emotional Intelligence" (MSCEIT V2.0)] : metodicheskoe posobie. Moscow: Smysl, 2017. 139 p. (In Russ.).
  2. Sergienko E.A. et. al. Testovaya metodika TEI dlya izmereniya emotsional'nogo intellekta [Test methodology of TEI for measuring emotional intelligence] [Elektronnyi resurs]. In Ushakov D.V., Medyntsev A.A. (eds.), Kognitivnye issledovaniya. Vyp, 7.. Izbrannye trudy konferentsii «Kognitivnye issledovaniya na sovremennom etape» [Cognitive Research. Vol. 7. Selected Proceedings of the Conference "Cognitive Research at the Present Stage"]. Moscow: Institute of Psychology RAS, 2017. pp. 160–184. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30789480&pff=1 (Accessed 11.08.2021). (In Russ.).
  3. Caruso D. Comment on R.J. Emmerling and D. Goleman, Emotional Intelligence: Issues and Common Misunderstandings [Elektronnyi resurs]. 2004. 8 p. In Consortium for Research on Emotional Intelligence in Organizations. URL: http://www.eiconsortium.org/pdf/defining_the_inkblot_called_emotional_intelligence.pdf (Accessed 04.08.2021).
  4. Ciarrochi J.V., Chan A.Y., Caputi P. A critical evaluation of the emotional intelligence construct. Personality and Individual Differences, 2000. Vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 539–561. DOI:10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00119-1
  5. Nathanson L. et al. Creating emotionally intelligent schools with RULER. Emotion Review, 2016. Vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 305–310. DOI:10.1177/1754073916650495
  6. Hawkins J.D. et al. Effects of social development intervention in childhood 15 years later. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 2008. Vol. 162, no. 12, pp. 1133–1141. DOI:10.1001/archpedi.162.12.1133
  7. Eisenberg N. Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 2000. Vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 665–697. DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.665
  8. Vega A. et al. Emotional Intelligence and Aggressive Behaviors in Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 2021. 11 p. DOI:10.1177/1524838021991296
  9. Baumsteiger R. et al. Enhancing school climate through social and emotional learning: effects of RULER in Mexican secondary schools. Learning Environments Research, 2021. 19 p. DOI:10.1007/s10984-021-09374-x
  10. Haviland-Jones J.M., Kahlbaugh P. Emotion and identity [Elektronnyi resurs]. In Lewis M., Haviland-Jones J.M. (eds.), Handbook of emotions 2nd edition. New York: The Guilford Press, 2000, pp. 293–305. URL: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2000-08486-000 (Accessed 04.08.2021).
  11. Lewis M. The emergence of human emotions [Elektronnyi resurs]. In Lewis M., Haviland-Jones J.M., Barrett L.F. (eds.), Handbook of emotions 3rd edition. New York: The Guilford Press, 2010, pp. 304–320. URL: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-07784-000 (Accessed 04.08.2021).
  12. Mayer J.D., Caruso D.R., Salovey P. Emotional intelligence meets traditional standards for an intelligence. Intelligence, 1999. Vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 267–298. DOI:10.1016/S0160-2896(99)00016-1
  13. Mayer J.D., Caruso D.R., Salovey P. The Ability Model of Emotional Intelligence: Principles and Updates. Emotion Review, 2016. Vol. 8, no 4, pp. 290–300. DOI:10.1016/S0160-2896(99)00016-1
  14. Mayer J.D., Salovey P., Caruso D.R. Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test: Youth Research Version Manual (MSCEIT: YRV Manual) [Elektronnyi resurs]. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems, 2014. In University of New Hampshire: Scholars Repository. URL: https://scholars.unh.edu/personality_lab/28/ (Accessed 04.08.2021).
  15. Rivers S.E. et al. Measuring emotional intelligence in early adolescence with the MSCEIT-YV: Psychometric properties and relationship with academic performance and psychosocial functioning. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2012. Vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 344–366. DOI:10.1177/0734282912449443
  16. Peters C., Kranzler J.H., Rossen E. Validity of the Mayer—Salovey—Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test: Youth Version—Research Edition. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 2009. Vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 76–81. DOI:10.1177/1754073916650495
  17. Caprara G.V. et al. Prosocial foundations of children's academic achievement. Psychological science, 2000. Vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 302–306. DOI:10.1111/1467-9280.00260
  18. Qualter P., Davis S. Emotional Intelligence: The Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Development, 2020. In Wiley Online Library. DOI:10.1002/9781119171492.wecad174
  19. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Elektronnyi resurs]. R Core Team (ed.). Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2016. URL: https://www.r-project.org/ (Accessed 04.08.2021).
  20. Rosseel Y. Lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 2012. Vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 1–36. DOI:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
  21. Brackett M.A. et al. RULER: A Theory-Driven, Systemic Approach to Social, Emotional, and Academic Learning. Educational Psychologist, 2019. Vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 1–18. DOI:10.1080/00461520.2019.1614447
  22. Saarni C. Coping with aversive feelings [Elektronnyi resurs]. Motivation and Emotion, 1997. Vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 45–63. URL: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1023/A:1024474314409.pdf (Accessed 04.08.2021).
  23. Salovey P., Mayer J.D. Emotional Intelligence, Report for the NTH Biomedical Research Support Grant S07 RR07015, NIH grant CA42101, NCHS Contract 200-88-7001. Detroit, MI: Haywood, 1990.
  24. Sutton J., Keogh E. Social competition in school: Relationships with bullying, Machiavellianism and personality. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2000. Vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 443–456. DOI:10.1348/000709900158227
  25. Hoffmann J. et al. Teaching emotion regulation in schools: Translating research into practice with the RULER approach to social and emotional learning. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 2020. Vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 105–109. DOI:10.1037/emo0000649
  26. Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis [Elektronnyi resurs]. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2009. 211 p. URL: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-0-387-98141-3.pdf (Accessed 04.08.2021).
  27. Zins J.E. Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say? [Elektronnyi resurs]. New York: Teachers College Press, 2004. 244 p. URL: https://books.google.ru/books?id=MuDGDHCb_iwC&lpg=PP1&hl=ru&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=false (Accessed 04.08.2021).

Information About the Authors

Elena A. Sergienko, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Principal researcher, Laboratory of Psychology of the development of the subject in normal and post-traumatic states, Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4068-9116, e-mail: elenas13@mail.ru

Elena A. Khlevnaya, Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor, Lecturer, Moscow International Higher Business School MIRBIS, Candidate of Psychology, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0975-6686, e-mail: elankha@yandex.ru

Tatiana S. Kiseleva, PhD in Psychology, Head of the Development Department, the international network of children's centers for the development of emotional intelligence, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3960-5096, e-mail: kiseleva@eilab.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 2563
Previous month: 151
Current month: 62

Downloads

Total: 2125
Previous month: 63
Current month: 31