Russian-language adaptation of methods for diagnosing acceptance and avoidance of experience

393

Abstract

The results of the Russian-language adaptation of the questionnaire «Measuring experiential avoidance» with 32 and 16 questions (Hayes, 2004) and «Acceptance and Action Questionnaire» with 9 and 7 questions (Bond, 2011) are presented. This questionnaire s measures an individual tendency of avoiding experience and action. The sample consisted of 313 respondents, age ranged from 17 to 64 years, with average years 34.25, 70% are female. In 32-question version received Cronbach's Alpha 0.773, but low CFI parameters. In 16-question version Cronbach Alpha is 0.78, also low CFI parameters. In 9-question version received Cronbach Alpha 0.649, which is sufficient for this type of scales, and the required CFI scores. The 7-question version gave Cronbach's Alpha 0.659 and the required CFI parameters. The validity of the scales checked by comparison of clinical groups and the results were satisfactory. The retest reliability was carried out after 3 months, checked by the Pearson correlation method and gave the results r = 0.84, with p <0.001. Variants with 32 and 16 questions gave results comparable to those of the original English language, and the scales with 7 and 9 questions meet all modern statistical requirements and are highly valid.

General Information

Keywords: psychodiagnostics, experiential avoidance, acceptance of experiences and action, behavioral avoidance

Journal rubric: Labour Psychology and Engineering Psychology

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2022110210

For citation: Yasin M.I. Russian-language adaptation of methods for diagnosing acceptance and avoidance of experience [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sovremennaia zarubezhnaia psikhologiia = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2022. Vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 113–121. DOI: 10.17759/jmfp.2022110210. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Borisonik E.V. Zavershennyi suitsid i suitsidal’naya popytka blizkogo cheloveka kak situatsiya ekstremal’nogo stressa dlya blizhaishego okruzheniya [Completed suicide and suicide attempt of a loved one as a situation of extreme stress for the immediate environment]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya [Modern foreign psychology], 2020. Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 62—67. DOI:10.17759/jmfp.2020090106 (In Russ.).

  2. Gessmann Kh.V., Sheronov E.A. Validnost’ psikhologicheskogo testa [Validity of the psychological test] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya [Modern foreign psychology], 2013, no. 4, pp. 20—31. URL: https://psyjournals.ru/files/65481/jmfp_2013_4_n2_Gessmann.pdf (Accessed 26.05.2022). (In Russ.).

  3. Larionov P.M. Klyuchevye problemy issledovaniya aleksitimii i ee vzaimosvyaz’ s kognitivnymi strategiyami regulyatsii emotsii, elastichnost’yu kopinga i emotsional’nymi narusheniyami [Key issues in the study of alexithymia and its relationship with cognitive strategies for regulating emotions, coping elasticity and emotional disorders]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling psychology and psychotherapy], 2021. Vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 44—65. DOI:10.17759/ cpp.2021290104 (In Russ.).

  4. Mitina O.V. Al’fa Kronbakha: kogda i zachem ee schitat’ [Cronbach’s alpha: when and why to count it]. In Baturina N.A. [et al.] (eds.), Sovremennaya psikhodiagnostika Rossii. Preodolenie krizisa: sbornik materialov III Vserossiiskoi konferentsii: v 2 t. [Modern psychodiagnostics of Russia. Overcoming the crisis: collection of materials of the III All-Russian Conference: in 2 volumes.]. Chelyabinsk: Izdatel’skii tsentr YuUrGU, 2015. Vol. 1, pp. 232—240.

  5. Kalugin A.Yu., Shchebetenko S.A., Mishkevich A.M., Soto K., Dzhon O. Psikhometrika russkoyazychnoi versii Big Five Inventory—2 = Psychometric Properties of the Russian Version of the Big Five Inventory—2. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki = Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2021. Vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 7—33. DOI:10.17323/1813- 8918-2021-1-7-33 (In Russ.).

  6. Asher M., Hofmann S.G., Aderka I.M. I’m Not Feeling It: Momentary Experiential Avoidance and Social Anxiety Among Individuals With Social Anxiety Disorder. Behavior Therapy, 2021. Vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 183—194. DOI:10.1016/j.beth.2020.04.001

  7. Pires C.P., Putwain D.W., Hofmann S.G., MacKenzie M.B., Kocovsk N.L., do C u Salvador M. Assessing psychological flexibility in test situations: The test anxiety acceptance and action questionnaire for adolescents. Revista de Psicopatologia y Psicologia Clinica, 2020. Vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 147—159. DOI:10.5944/RPPC.29014

  8. Boelen P.A., Reijntjes A. Measuring Experiential Avoidance: Reliability and Validity of the Dutch 9-item Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 2008. Vol. 30, pp. 241—251. DOI:10.1007/s10862-008-9082-4

  9. Hayes S.C., Wilson K.G., Gifford E.V., Follette V.M., Strosahl K. Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: A functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment [Elektronnyi resurs]. In Hayes S.C. (ed.), The Act in Context: The Canonical Papers of Steven C. Hayes. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, 2016, pp. 171—203. URL: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-53131-011 (Accessed 27.05.2022).

  10. Kashdana T.B., Barriosb V., Forsythb J.P., Steger M.F. Experiential avoidance as a generalized psychological vulnerability: Comparisons with coping and emotion regulation strategies. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2006. Vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 1301—1320. DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2005.10.003

  11. Harris R. Embracing your demons: an overview of acceptance and commitment therapy [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psychotherapy in Australia, 2006. Vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 2—8. URL: https://www.readkong.com/page/embracing-your- demons-an-overview-of-acceptance-and-4371435 (Accessed 27.05.2022).

  12. Hu L., Bentler P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999. Vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1—55. DOI:10.1080/10705519909540118

  13. Kingston J., Clarke S., Remington B. Experiential avoidance and problem behavior: A mediational analysis. Behavior Modification, 2010. Vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 145—163. DOI:10.1177/0145445510362575

  14. Kroska E.B., Roche A.I., O’Hara M.W. Childhood Trauma and Somatization: Identifying Mechanisms for Targeted Intervention. Mindfulness, 2018. Vol. 9, pp. 1845—1856. DOI:10.1007/s12671-018-0927-y

  15. Hayes S.C., Strosahl K., Wilson K.G. et al. Measuring experiential avoidance: A preliminary test of a working model [Elektronnyi resurs]. The Psychological Record, 2004. Vol. 54, pp. 553—578. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03395492 (Accessed 27.05.2022).

  16. Morina N. The role of experiential avoidance in psychological functioning after war-related stress in Kosovar civilians. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 2007. Vol. 195, no. 8, pp. 697—700. DOI:10.1097/NMD.0b013e31811f44a6

  17. Pituch K.A., Stevens J.P. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences (6th. Edition). New York: Routledge, 2015. 814 p. DOI:10.4324/9781315814919

  18. Bond F.W., Hayes S.C., Baer R.A., Carpenter K.M., Guenole N., Orcutt H.K., Waltz T., Zettle R.D. Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire — II: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior Therapy, 2011. Vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 676—688. DOI:10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007

  19. Valdivia-Salas S., Martín-Albo J., Cruz A., Villanueva-Blasco V.J., Jiménez T.I. Psychological Flexibility with Prejudices Increases Empathy and Decreases Distress Among Adolescents: A Spanish Validation of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-Stigma. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021. Vol. 11. Article ID 565638. P. 9 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.565638

  20. Doorley J.D., Goodma F.R., Kelso K.C., Kashda T.B. Psychological flexibility: What we know, what we do not know, and what we think we know. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2020. Vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 1—11. DOI:10.1111/spc3.12566

  21. Paladines-Costa B., López-Guerra V., Ruisoto P., Vaca-Gallegos S., Cacho R. Psychometric properties and factor structure of the spanish version of the acceptance and action questionnaire-ii (Aaq-ii) in Ecuador. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021. Vol. 18, no. 6. Article ID 2944. 1P. 0 DOI:10.3390/ijerph18062944

  22. Soltani E., Ghanizadeh A., Dastgheib S.A., Wong Q.J.J., Jaafari N. Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the acceptance and Action Questionnaire for obsessions and compulsions (AAQ-OC). Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 2020. Vol. 27. Article ID100582. DOI:10.1016/j.jocrd.2020.100582

  23. Karadere M.E., Yavuz K.F., Asafov E.Y., Küçükler F.K. Reliability and validity of a turkish version of the acceptance and action diabetes questionnaire. Psychiatry Investigation, 2019. Vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 418—424. DOI:10.30773/pi.2019.02.26.2

  24. Juang H.L., Chang Y.Y.C., Tseng B.L., Chang C.-C., Shiah Y.J. Role of psychological acceptance between personality and happiness. Current Psychology, 2021. Vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 1048—1055. DOI:10.1007/s12144-018-0026-1

  25. Kirk A., Meyer J.M., Whisman M.A., Deacon B.J., Arch J.J. Safety behaviors, experiential avoidance, and anxiety: A path analysis approach. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 2019. Vol. 64, pp. 9—15. DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2019.03.002

  26. Faul F., Erdfelder E., Buchner A., Lang A. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 2009. Vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1149—1160. DOI:10.3758/brm.41.4.1149

  27. Steil R., Ehlers A. Dysfunctional meaning of posttraumatic intrusions in chronic PTSD. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2000. Vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 537—558. DOI:10.1016/S0005-7967(99)00069-8

  28. Warnke A.S., Nagy S.M., Pickett S.M., Jarrett N.L., Hunsanger J.A. The examination of behavior inhibition system sensitivity, experiential avoidance, and sex in relation to post-traumatic stress symptom severity: Comparison of a moderated versus mediated model. Personality and Individual Differences, 2018. Vol. 132, pp. 60—65. DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2018.05.019

  29. Tull T.M., Gratz L.K., Salters K., Roemer L. The role of experiential avoidance in posttraumatic stress symptoms and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and somatization. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 2004. Vol. 192, no. 11, pp. 754—761. DOI:10.1097/01.nmd.0000144694.30121.89

  30. Manwaring J., Hilbert A., Walden K., Bishop E.R., Johnson C. Validation of the acceptance and action questionnaire for weight-related difficulties in an eating disorder population. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 2018. Vol. 7, pp. 1—7. DOI:10.1016/j.jcbs.2017.09.004

Information About the Authors

Miroslav I. Yasin, Graduate Student, School of Psychology, National Research University «Higher School of Economics», Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6249-8527, e-mail: yasin.mi@yandex.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 1182
Previous month: 87
Current month: 64

Downloads

Total: 393
Previous month: 35
Current month: 40