Theatrical reforms of Luigi Pirandello and Antonin Artaud: a comparative analysis

Context and relevance. This article examines the theatrical reforms of Luigi Pirandello and Antonin Artaud. Objective. To identify similar techniques, methods, and approaches to transforming a performance to transform the audience's value hierarchy. Hypothesis. Both theatrical figures understood theater as an opportunity to emotionally impact the audience, with the goal of penetrating the depths of the human unconscious and returning modern man to basic cultural values. Methods and materials. To achieve the research objectives, the author applied comparative, axiological, dialectical, and cultural methods to analyze the creative ideas of two outstanding theatrical figures who greatly influenced contemporary theatrical art. Primary attention is paid to the value aspects reflected in the playwrights' linguistic and technical methods. The comparative method facilitated the study of the characteristics of the theatrical work of Pirandello and Artaud, identifying the common and specific features in their concepts of performance. Dialectical and cultural methods were applied for a dynamic study of the problem in a specific cultural environment. Results. The study revealed that Pirandello and Artaud deconstructed performances so that, without being distracted by the plot, audiences would recognize their dependence on existing, soulless norms and attempt to reclaim their lost identity. The playwrights used words in performances in a new way, seeking to diminish the role of language, believing that words no longer express the essence of the individual, but only the social mask. They explore the relationship between mask and personality, in which the mask assumes a leading role, resulting in the dehumanization of culture. Pirandello and Artaud understand the dangers of "entertainment culture," the inculcation of banalities and deceptive ease of perception, which contribute to modern man's withdrawal from reality. They consider their exalted performances an effective means of transforming contemporary society. During a period of cultural crisis, they were among the first to understand the need for fundamental change in society and attempted to transform it through innovative performances. Conclusions. Despite their different approaches to the use of innovative technologies and their belonging to different nations, Pirandello and Artaud set themselves the same creative goals: to awaken public consciousness with the help of exalted, harsh theatre, and to return society to fundamental values.

1. Арто, А. (1993). Театр и его двойник. Москва: Театр Серафима Мартис.
   Artaud, A. (1993). The Theater and its Double. Moscow: Teatr Serafima Martis. (In Russ.).
2. Бодлер, Ш. (2020). Цветы зла. Москва: АСТ.
   Baudelaire, C. (2020). Les Fleurs du Mal. Moscow: AST. (In Russ.).
3. Боннар, А. (1994). Греческая цивилизация(Т. 2). Ростов-на-Дону: Феникс.
   Bonnard, A. (1994). Greek Civilization (Vol. 2). Rostov-on-Don: Feniks. (In Russ.).
4. Бояджиев, Г.Н., Дживелегов, А.К. (1942). История западноевропейского театра от возникновения до 1789 года. Москва; Ленинград: Искусство.
   Boyadzhiev, G.N., Dzhivelegov, A.K. (1942). History of Western European Theater from its Origins to 1789. Moscow; Leningrad: Iskusstvo. (In Russ.).
5. Бушуева, Т.И. (2017). Роль Анимы в развитии личности мужчины в концепции К.Г. Юнга. Контекст и рефлексия: философия о мире и человеке, 6(2А), 237–249.
   Bushueva, T.I. (2017). The role of Anima in the development of male personality in K.G. Jung's concept. Context and Reflection: Philosophy of the World and Man, 6(2A), 237–249. (In Russ.).
6. Достоевский, Ф.М. (2022). Преступление и наказание. Москва: Азбука.
   Dostoevsky, F.M. (2022). Crime and Punishment. Moscow: Azbuka. (In Russ.).
7. Достоевский, Ф.М. (2025). Братья Карамазовы. Москва: Азбука.
   Dostoevsky, F.M. (2025). The Brothers Karamazov. Moscow: Azbuka. (In Russ.).
8. Кулишова, О.В. (2014). Античный театр: организация и оформление драматических представлений в Афинах в V в. до н.э. Санкт-Петербург: Гуманитарная Академия.
   Kulishova, O.V. (2014). Ancient Theater: Organization and Design of Dramatic Performances in Athens in the 5th Century BC. St. Petersburg: Humanitarian Academy. (In Russ.).
9. Лене, П. (2000). Ирреволюция. Москва.
   Lene, P. (2000). Irrevolution. Moscow. (In Russ.).
10. Маньковская, Н.Б. (2013). Художественно-эстетические константы французского символизма. В: В.В. Бычков, Н.Б. Маньковская (ред.), Эстетика: Вчера. Сегодня. Всегда (Вып. 6, с. 3–29). Москва: Институт философии Российской академии наук.
    Mankovskaya, N.B. (2013). Artistic and aesthetic constants of French symbolism. In V.V. Bychkov, N.B. Mankovskaya (Eds.), Aesthetics: Yesterday. Today. Always (Iss. 6, pp. 3–29). Moscow: Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russ.).
11. Маритен, Ж. (2004). Избранное: Величие и нищета метафизики. Москва: Российская политическая энциклопедия.
    Maritain, J. (2004). Selected Works: The Grandeur and Misery of Metaphysics. Moscow: Rossiyskaya Politicheskaya Entsiklopediya. (In Russ.).
12. Ортега-и-Гассет, Х. (1991). Дегуманизация искусства. Москва.
    Ortega y Gasset, J. (1991). The Dehumanization of Art. Moscow. (In Russ.).
13. Сартр, Ж.-П. (1989). Экзистенциализм – это гуманизм. В: Сумерки богов(с. 319–345). Москва: Издательство политической литературы.
    Sartre, J.-P. (1989). Existentialism is humanism. In Twilight of the Gods (pp. 319–345). Moscow: Izdatelstvo Politicheskoy Literatury. (In Russ.).
14. Сартр, Ж.-П. (1996). За закрытыми дверями. В: Философские пьесы(с. 75–112). Москва: Канон.
    Sartre, J.-P. (1996). No Exit. In Philosophical Plays (pp. 75–112). Moscow: Kanon. (In Russ.).
15. Симонова, С.А., Аталян, Г.Б. (2022). К вопросу об эволюции искусства в XX–XXI вв.: культурологический анализ. Известия Самарского научного центра Российской академии наук. Социальные, гуманитарные, медико-биологические науки, 24(84), 84–92. https://doi.org/10.37313/2413-9645-2022-24-84-84-92
    Simonova, S.A., Atalyan, G.B. (2022). On the evolution of art in the XX–XXI centuries: A culturological analysis. Izvestiya Samarskogo Nauchnogo Tsentra Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. Sotsial'nye, Gumanitarnye, Mediko-Biologicheskie Nauki, 24(84), 84–92. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37313/2413-9645-2022-24-84-84-92
16. Федин, К. (1973). Илья Эрненбург. Писатель. Искусство. Время(3-е изд., доп.). Москва.
    Fedin, K. (1973). Ilya Ehrenburg. Writer. Art. Time (3rd ed., enl.). Moscow. (In Russ.).