The Image of Personal Future in High School and College Students

The article is devoted to the analysis of empirical data on the structure and content of the image of personal future among high school and junior college students. The study was carried out using the method of prototypical analysis of free associations by P. Verges, developed in line with the concept of social representations by S. Moscovici. The hypothesis was tested that the respondents' image of the future will be different depending on their gender and level of education. The study involved junior college students (153 people) and students of grades 10-11 of secondary schools in Moscow, Chelyabinsk and Orsk (191 people). It is established that the aspiration to the future still remains the leading psychological characteristic of adolescence, and the expressed optimism of the personal future image is interpreted as a predictor of readiness to overcome the crisis of self-determination. Gender differences in the structure and content of the personal future image are manifested in the orientation of young men mainly to professional self-realization, while for young women family and the emotional comfort associated with it are more important. The educational status of respondents also influences the content of the psychological image of personal future. Schoolchildren are distinguished by pronounced immaturity, naivety and cliched social ideas about their adult life, while college students show a somewhat more realistic picture.

1. Abul'khanova-Slavskaya K.A. Sotsial'noe myshlenie lichnosti [Social thinking of personality]. Materialy yubileinoi nauchnoi konferentsii IP RAN "Sovremennaya psikhologiya: Sostoyanie i perspektivy issledovanii. Chast' 3. Sotsial'nye predstavleniya i myshlenie lichnosti" (g. Moskva, 28–29 yanvarya 2002 g.) [Materials of the anniversary scientific conference of the IP RAS "Modern psychology: The state and prospects of research. Part 3. Social representations and thinking of personality"]. Moscow: IP RAN Publ., 2002,  pp. 88–103. (In Russ.).
2. Andreeva A.D. Psikhologicheskii obraz detstva u roditelei sovremennykh shkol'nikov [Psychological image of childhood characteristic of modern schoolchildren’s parents]. Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta [Vestnik of Minin University], 2019. Vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 11. DOI:10.26795/2307-1281-2019-7-4-11. (In Russ.).
3. Berulava G.A. Obraz mira kak mifologicheskii simvol [Image of the world as a mythological symbol]. Moscow: Pedagogicheskoe obshchestvo Rossii Publ., 2001. 236 p. (In Russ.).
4. Bovina I.B. Strategii issledovaniya sotsial'nykh predstavlenii [Strategies for the Study of Social Representations]. Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal [Sociological Journal], 2011, no. 3, pp. 5–23. (In Russ.).
5. Bozhovich L.I. Lichnost' i ee formirovanie v detskom vozraste [Personality and its formation in childhood]. Saint-Petersburg: Piter Publ., 2008. 400 p.  (In Russ.).
6. Brushlinskii A.V. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya v Rossii i teoriya Serzha Moskovichi [Social psychology in Russia and theory of Serge Moskovich]. Predislovie k russkomu izdaniyu knigi S. Moskovichi "Vek tolp" [Preface to the Russian edition of book S. Moskovich "Century of Crowds"]. Moscow: Tsentr psikhologii i psikhoterapii Publ., 1998, pp. 5–21. (In Russ.).
7. Vasilyuk F.V. Metodologicheskii analiz v psikhologii [Methodological analysis in psychology]. Moscow: MGPPU Publ.; Smysl Publ., 2003. 272 p. (In Russ.).
8. Emel'yanova T.P. Sotsial'nye predstavleniya: istoriya, teoriya i empiricheskie issledovaniya [Social representations: history, theory and empirical research]. Moscow: IP RAN Publ., 2016. 476 p. (In Russ.).
9. Emel'yanova T.P., Drobysheva T.V. Kompleksnoe issledovanie kollektivnykh perezhivanii sotsial'nykh problem: kolichestvennye i kachestvennye metody [Integrated research of collective feelings for social problems: quantitative and qualitative-quantitative methods]. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 2018. Vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 166–175. DOI:10.17759/sps.2018090316. (In Russ.).
10. Moskvicheva N.L., et. al. Zhiznennye modeli molodykh lyudei: predstavleniya o budushchei sem'e i modeli, transliruemoi roditelyami [Life Models in Young People: Ideas of Future Family and Impacts of Parental Models]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2019. Vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 5–18. DOI:10.17759/pse.2019240301. (In Russ.).
11. Leont'ev A.N. Obraz mira [World Image]. Mir psikhologii [World of Psychology], 2003, no. 4, pp. 11–18. (In Russ.).
12. Lyubtsova A.V. Tsennostnye orientiry sovremennoi molodezhi v kontekste formirovaniya prosotsial'nogo povedeniya [Values of modern youth in the context of formation of prosocial behavior]. Rossiiskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Russian Psychological Journal], 2020. Vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 65–79. DOI:10.21702/rpj.2020.4.5. (In Russ.).
13. Moskovichi C. Sotsial'nye predstavleniya: istoricheskii vzglyad [Social Representations: Historical View]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Psychological Journal],  1995.  Vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 3–18. (In Russ.).
14. Pavlenko K.V., Bochaver A.A. Sub"ektivnoe blagopoluchie shkol'nikov v situatsii samoopredeleniya [Subjective well-being of school students in situation of Self-Identification]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2020. Vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 51–62. DOI:10.17759/pse.2020250605. (In Russ.).
15. Sobkin V.S., Kalashnikova E.A. K voprosu o mezhpokolencheskikh razlichiyakh v sotsial'nom samochuvstvii podrostkov: zhiznennaya pozitsiya i otsenka znachimosti ugroz [On the Question of Intergenerational Differences in the Social Well-Being of Adolescents: Life Position and Assessment of Threat Significanc]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2021. Vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 54–69. DOI:10.17759/ pse.2021260303. (In Russ.).
16. Tolstykh N.N., Ter-Avanesova N.V., Chernyak N.A. Sotsial'nye predstavleniya o shkole i uchenii v raznykh gruppakh uchastnikov obrazovatel'nogo protsessa [Social Representations About School and Learning in Different Groups of Participants of the Educational Process]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2019. Vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 5–15. DOI:10.17759/pse.2019240601. (In Russ.).
17. Andreeva A.D., et al. Formirovanie lichnosti starsheklassnika [Shaping the personality of a high school student]. In Dubrovina I.V. (ed.), NII obshch. i ped. psikhologii APN SSSR [The Scientific Research Institute of General and Pedagogical Psychology of the USSR Academy of Pedagogical Sciences]. Moscow: Pedagogika Publ., 1989. 169 p. (In Russ.).
18. Yaremchuk S.V., Bakina A.V., Sityaeva S.M. Osobennosti zhiznennogo mira yunoshei i devushek raznykh vozrastnykh periodov [Features of the life world of young men and girls of different age periods]. Rossiiskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Russian Psychological Journal], 2021. Vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 34–46. DOI:10.21702/rpj.2021.1.3. (In Russ.).
19. Abric J-C. A structural approach to social representations. In Deaux K. (eds.). Representations of the social: Bridging theoretical traditions. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2001, pp. 42–47.
20. Foster J. Unification and differentiation: a study of the social representations of mental illness. Papers on Social Representations, 2001. Vol. 10, pp. 1–18.
21. The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations. In Sammut G. (eds.). Cambridge:  Cambridge University Press, 2015. 498 p.
22. Vergès P. L’Evocation de l’argent: une méthode pour la définition du noyau central d’une représentation. Bulletin de psychologie, 1992. Vol. XLV, no. 405,  pp. 203–209.