Internal factors affecting the jury members verdict



The article is devoted to the analysis of socio-demographic and individual psychological characteristics that influence the verdict of jury. The study involved 38 men and women aged 25 to 64 years. With the help of a questionnaire, developed on the basis of legal development model by J. Tapp and F. Levine, we revealed levels of jury members’ legal conscience, which, together with socio-demographic characteristics and personality characteristics of the subjects, identified by R. Cattell 16PF Questionnaire, were related to the responses on the Questionnaire while returning verdict on specially selected criminal cases with implicit guilt of the defendant. According to the study, it was determined that the socio-demographic characteristics of the jurors did not significantly affect their verdict, and among the psychological characteristics of the jurors the greatest impact on their verdict has the level of legal development. Thus, depending on the nature of the crime (violent, non-violent or committed through negligence), the same level of legal conscience differently affect the decision of jurors.

General Information

Keywords: jury, verdict, level of legal development, violent crimes, non-violent crimes, anxiety, self-control.

Journal rubric: Forensic and Clinical Psychology in Legal Context

Article type: scientific article

For citation: Kalashnikova A., Levochkina N.S. Internal factors affecting the jury members verdict [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and Law, 2013. Vol. 3, no. 2 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)


  1. Adorno T. Issledovanie avtoritarnoj lichnosti // Pod obshh. red. d-ra filos. nauk V. P. Kultygina. M., 2001.
  2. Gulevich O.A. Psihologija v sude prisjazhnyh. Analiticheskij obzor: Uchebnoe posobie dlja studentov fakul'tetov psihologii vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij po special'nosti 020400 – «Psihologija». M., 2003.
  3. Gulevich O.A. Psihologicheskie osnovy jurisprudencii: Uchebnoe posobie. M.,  2009.
  4. Zakon Rossijskoj Federacii «O prisjazhnyh zasedateljah federal'nyh sudov obshhej jurisdikcii v RF»: [prinjat Gos. Dumoj 31 ijulja 2004 g.: odobr. Sovetom Federacii 8 avgusta 2004 g., № 113-FZ] // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 2004,     № 34, st. 3528.
  5. Kapustina A.N. Mnogofaktornaja lichnostnaja metodika R. Kettella. SPb., 2007.
  6. Butler B., Moran G.  The impact of death qualification, belief in a just world, legal authoritarianism, and locus of control on venire persons’ evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials // Behavioral Sciences and the Law. 2007.      Vol. 25. P. 57–68.
  7. ForsterLee R., ForsterLee L., Horowitz I.A., King E. The effects of defendant race, victim race, and juror gender on evidence processing in a murder trial // Behavioral Sciences and the Law. 2006. Vol. 24. P. 179–198.
  8. Sommers S.R., Ellsworth P.C. White juror bias. An investigation of prejudice against Black defendants in the American courtroom // Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 2001. Vol. 7. P. 201–229.
  9. Tapp J.L., Kohlbrg L. Developing senses of law and legal justice // The Journal of Social Issues. 1971. Vol. 27. P. 65–92.
  10. Worthington D.L. Exploring juror`s listening processes: the effect of listening style preference on juror decision making // International Journal of Listening. 2001. Vol. 15. P. 20–37.

Information About the Authors

Anna Kalashnikova, PhD in Psychology, Senior Researcher, Chief Public Relations Specialist, V. Serbsky National Medical Research Centre for Psychiatry and Narcology, Assistant Professor, Department of Clinical and Forensic Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID:

N. S. Levochkina, Student, Department of Legal Psychology, MSUPE, Moscow, Russia, e-mail:



Total: 12776
Previous month: 69
Current month: 27


Total: 1631
Previous month: 5
Current month: 11