Features of Malevolent Creativity and its Prevention in Adolescents in the Modern Socio-Political Context

The article presents the results of a series of studies on the influence of socio-political conditions — the modern context and the pre-covid period, on the manifestation of malevolent creativity in behavior that harms other people. The sample consisted of adolescents (N=52, 19 - boys; Age = 16.0 years); samples of cadets (N=96, 72 - boys; М = 15.4 years), cadets-students (N=204, 152 — men; M = 19.3), psychology students (N=50, 3 - men; M = 20.4). Hypotheses about differences in different contexts were tested: 1. in the levels of antisocial creativity, 2. in the relationship with personal characteristics and between personal characteristics, 3. the presence of age-related characteristics that do not differ in different socio-political conditions. A battery of questionnaires was used: NEO-FFI, BPAQ-24, "Behavioral features of antisocial creativity", moral identity, "Tolerance Index" and a developed questionnaire with statements about the presence/absence of attention to the news about the situation in Russia and the world and the sources of this information. The results obtained confirmed the hypotheses put forward. It is noted that the existing limitations in the study made it possible to identify not only the features of antisocial creativity in adolescents in different socio-political conditions, but also features related to the professional context (civil professions and law enforcement agencies), allowing them to be taken into account in the prevention of antisocial creativity in the modern socio-political context.

1.  Bochkova M.N. Features of the Relationship of Malevolent Creativity and Understanding of One’s Own Emotions [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology andLaw, 2023. Vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 135—149. DOI:10.17759/psylaw.2023130310. (In Russ.)
2. Enikolopov S.N., Bochkova M.N., Meshkova N.V., Meshkov I.A. Adaptation of the Moral Identity Questionnaire on the Russian Sample [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psychological-Educational Studies, 2023. Vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 115—134. DOI: 10.17759/psyedu.2023150308
3. Meshkova N.V. Social Creativity and Context: Perspectives of Research [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sovremennaia zarubezhnaia psikhologiia = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2023. Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 100—108. DOI: 10.17759/jmfp.2023120111. (In Russ.)
4. Meshkova N.V., Shapoval V.A., Gerasimenko E.A., Potarykina M.S., Meshkov I.A. Personal features and malevolent creativity on the example of cadets and policemen [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and Law, 2018. Vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 83—96. DOI: 10.17759/psylaw.2018080306. (In Russ.)
5. Meshkova N.V., Enikolopov S.N., Kudryavtsev V.T., Kravtsov O.G., Bochkova M.N., Meshkov I.A.. Age and Gender Characteristics of Personality Predictors for Antisocial Creativity. PSYCHOLOGY Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2020. Vol. 17, no.1, pp. 59—71. DOI:10.17323/1813-8918-2020-1-60-72
6. Meshkova N.V., Bochkova M.N., Kravtsov O.E. Malevolent Creativity and Personal Features of Young People in Different Socio-Political Conditions: Relationship and Interaction. Lomonosov Psychology Journal, 2024. Vol. 47 (1), pp. 8—105. DOI:10.11621/LPJ-24-04
7. Aquino K.F., Reed A. The Self-importance of Moral Identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002. Vol. 83(6), pp. 1423—1440.
8. Bedu-Addo P., Mahama I., Amoako B., Amos P., Antwi T. Neglectful Parenting and Personality Traits as Predictors of Malevolent Creativity among Ghanaian Tertiary Education Students. Creative Education, 2023. Vol. 14, pp. 232-244. DOI:10.4236/ce.2023.142016.
9. Cui X., Zhang X., Zhang H. The impact of parenting style on malevolent creativity based on Chinese university students: a latent profile analysis. Front. Psychol., 2024. Vol. 15. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.363778
10. Hennessey B.A., Amabile T.M. Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 2010, no. 61, pp. 569—598. DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416.
11. Kapoor H., Kaufman J.C. The evil within: The AMORAL model of dark creativity. Theory & Psychology, 2022. Vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 467—490. DOI:10.1177/09593543221074326
12. Li W., Zhang L., et al. Childhood Trauma and Malevolent Creativity in Chinese College Students: Moderated Mediation by Psychological Resilience and Aggression. Journal of Intelligence, 2022. Vol. 10(4), pp. 97. DOI:10.3390/jintelligence10040097
13. Lubart T. The 7 C’s of Creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 2017. Vol. 51, pp. 293—296. DOI:10.1002/jocb.190
14. Rhodes M. An analysis of creativity. The Phi Beta Kappen, 1961. Vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 305—310
15. Samuel T. Hunter, Kayla Walters, Tin Nguyen, Caroline Manning & Scarlett Miller Malevolent Creativity and Malevolent Innovation: A Critical but Tenuous Linkage. Creativity Research Journal, 2021,  no. 2, pp. 123—144. DOI:10.1080/10400419.2021.1987735
16. Sternberg R.J., Karami S. An 8P theoretical framework for understanding creativity and theories of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 2022. Vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 55—78. DOI:10.1002/jocb.516 21.
17. Szabó E., Körmendi A., Kurucz G., Cropley D., Olajos T., Pataky N. Personality Traits as Predictors of Malevolent Creative Ideation in Offenders. Behav. Sci., 2022. Vol. 12, pp. 242. DOI:10.3390/bs12070242
18. Tromp C., Sternberg R. Dynamic Creativity: A Person × Task × Situation Interaction Framework. Journal of Creative Behavior, 2022. Vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 553—565. DOI:10.1002/jocb.551
19. Woodman R.W., Schoenfeldt L.F. An interactionist model of creative behavior. Journal of Creative Behavior, 1990. Vol. 24(4), pp. 279—290. DOI:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1990.tb00549.x