Skip to Main Content

Sociosphera
2010. no. 4, 14–23
ISSN: 2078-7081

Basic concepts in the modern philosophy of social sciences

549

D.G. Kukarnikov

PDF (RUS)
Online translation in english
GS
Information
in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article is devoted to the contemporary issues in the philosophy of social sciences. Basic models of social cognition (naturalism, antinaturalism, pluralism, critical approach) are analyzed here. The author investigates the main trends in the philosophy of social sciences and outlines perspectives of the future elaboration.

General Information

Keywords: naturalism, antinaturalism, philosophy of social sciences, pluralism, phenomenological sociology, ideal type, social reality, critical social science, explanation theory, concepts and methods, theories of scientific growth.

Journal rubric: Philosophy

Article type: scientific article

For citation: Kukarnikov D.G. Basic concepts in the modern philosophy of social sciences. Sociosfera = Sociosphera, 2010. no. 4, pp. 14–23. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Braybrooke D. Philosophy of the Social Science. – Englewood­Cliffs, N.Y.: Prentice­Hall, 1987.
  2. Brodbeck M. Readings in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. – London: Macmillan, 1968.
  3. Diesing P. Patterns of Discovery in the Social Sciences. – Chicago: Aldine­Atherton, 1981.
  4. Fay B. Critical Social Science / Brian Fay. – Ithaka: Cornell University Press, 1987.
  5. Fay B. What Would an Adequate Philosophy of Social Science Look Like? // In: Read­ings in the Philosophy of Social Science. – Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2000. – Chapter 2. – P. 21–36.
  6. Fodor J. The Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis // In: Readings in the Phi­losophy of Social Science. – Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2000. – P. 687–700.
  7. Krimerman L. The Nature and Scope of Social Science. – New York: Appleton­Century­Crofts, 1969.
  8. Lakatos I., Musgrave A. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. – Cambridge: Cam­bridge University Press, 1979.
  9. Little D. Varieties of Social Explanation. – Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1991.
  10. Martin M. Taylor on Interpretation and the Sciences of Man // In: Readings in the Phi­losophy of Social Sciense. – Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2000. – P. 259–280.
  11. Nagel E. The Structure of Science. – New York, Harcourt: Brace & World, 1961.
  12. Popper K.R. Pluralist Approach to the Philosophy of History // In: Roads to Freedom. Essays in Honour of Friedrich A. von Hayek. – London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969.
  13. Psathas G. Phenomenological Sociology: Issues and Applications. – New York: John Wiley, 1973.
  14. Rabiniv P., Sullivan W. Interpretive Social Science: A Second Look. – Berkeley: Univer­sity of California Press, 1987.
  15. Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science / Ed. by Michael Martin and Lee C. McIn­tyre. – Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2000.
  16. Rosenberg A. Philosophy of the Social Science. – Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1988.
  17. Smirnova N. M. From social metaphysics to phenomenology «natural line» (phenomenol­ogical theme in contemporary social cognition). – M.: Ifrane, 1997. – 178 pp.
  18. Shyuts A. Formation of concepts and theories in the social sciences / Shyuts A. Se­lected: World glowing sense. – M.: ROSSPEN, 2004.

Information About the Authors

D. G. Kukarnikov, Voronezh State University, Voronezh, Russia

Metrics

Views

Total: 5501
Previous month: 1
Current month: 3

Downloads

Total: 549
Previous month: 2
Current month: 0