Perception of an Ambivalent Other Under Conditions of Contrasting Pre-Stimulation

Objective. Pre-stimulus effects of extreme personal valence on the perception of an ambivalent person.Background. The purpose of modern information technologies is not only to inform, but also to form certain views and opinions. These technologies are used in the media space, as well as in other areas of social interaction. The effects of behavioral conditioning, or priming, play an important role in the perception construction. At the same time, the question of the factors leading to its direct (assimilative) and inverse (contrast) effects remains poorly understood. Thus, any forecast of behavioral reactions in vivo becomes too imprecise.Study design. During the experiment, participants watched video interviews with a target object (male or female), who answered the Short Dark Triad questions, demonstrating the ambivalence of dark features. In two experimental groups, the perception of the target object was preceded by the presentation of an extremely “bad” or extremely “good” personality. In the control group, the target object was presented without pre-stimulus exposure. After viewing, the participants completed the Target Attitude Scale. The data were processed using ANOVA. Additionally, the effects of gender on the attitude variable were monitored.Participants. The sample consisted of 608 students from 17 to 35 years old (M=20.17, SD=1.53), including 173 men (28%) and 435 women (72%).Measurements. Short Dark Triad by D. Jones and D. Paulhus, adapted by M.S. Egorova et al., The Scale of the General Attitude to the Perceived Object by S.A. Shchebetenko et al.Results. The general attitude towards an ambivalent object, measured by the Scale of the General Attitude to the Perceived Object, becomes significantly more positive after presentation of a negative pre-stimulus, compared to the control and a positive pre-stimulus conditions (p<0.001). In the male sample, there is no significant effect of a negative pre-stimulus on the perception of a woman with an ambivalent representation of dark features (p>0.10).Conclusions. Pre-stimulus of extreme intensity can determine the contrast effect not only in perception of abstract object, but also in perception of ambivalent person. It is shown that the preliminary presentation of an extremely negative person shifts the assessment of the ambivalent person upward. An extremely positive person pre-stimulus does not make the same effect. The effect of a negative pre-stimulus is significant in the perception of men by women, but does not extend to the perception of women by men.

 

1. Egorova M.S., Sitnikova M.A., Parshikova O.V. Adaptatsiya Korotkogo oprosnika Temnoi triady [Adaptation of the Short Dark Triad] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya = Psychological research, 2015. Vol. 8, no. 43, pp. 1. DOI:10.54359/ps.v8i43.1052 (In Russ.).
2. Kaneman D. Dumai medlenno… reshai bystro [Thinking, fast and slow]. Moscow: AST Publ. 653 p. (In Russ.).
3. Kostina D.I. Usloviya vozniknoveniya negativnogo praiming-effekta [Conditions affecting the negative priming effect occurrence]. Vestnik SPbGU. Psikhologiya i pedagogika = St. Petersburg State University Bulletin. Psychology and Pedagogy Series, 2017, no. 7(1), pp. 55—65. DOI:10.21638/11701/ spbu16.2017.1 (In Russ.).
4. Kostrigin A.A., Petrenko V.F. Otsenochnyi praiming kak perspektivnyi metod analiza bessoznatel’nykh lichnostnykh ustanovok: obzor zarubezhnykh issledovanii [Evaluative priming as a promising method of the study of unconscious personal attitudes: the review of foreign research]. Yaroslavskii pedagogicheskii vestnik = Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 2020, no. 1(112), pp. 132—147. DOI:10.20323/1813-145Kh-2020-1-112-131-14 (In Russ.).
5. Radchikova N.P., Popkovich I.A. Vliyanie praiminga na tipichnost’ kategorii ob”ektov u polezavisimykh i polenezavisimykh studentov [Influence of priming on the typicality of object categories in field-dependent and field-independent students]. Vestnik Polotskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya E. Pedagogicheskie nauki = Bulletin of Polotsk State University. Series E. Pedagogical Sciences, 2008, no. 5, pp. 81—84. (In Russ.).
6. Rasskazova E.I., Migunova Yu.M. Pozitivnyi i negativnyi praiming kak faktor vozniknoveniya telesnykh oshchushchenii v norme (na primere oshchushchenii v oblasti golovy i shei) [Positive and negative priming as a factor of bodily sensations in the healthy controls (on the sensations in head and neck)]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya = Experimental psychology (Russia), 2018, no. 11(3), pp. 94—107. DOI:10.17759/exppsy.2018110307 (In Russ.).
7. Falikman M.V., Koifman A.Ya. Vidy praiminga v issledovaniyakh vospriyatiya i pertseptivnogo vnimaniya [Types of priming in studies of perception and perceptual attention]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14: Psikhologiya = Moscow University Psychology Bulletin, 2005, no. 3, pp. 86—97. (In Russ.).
8. Shchebetenko S.A., Baleva M.V., Kornienko D.S. Stereotip i sotsial’naya ugroza kak faktory vospriyatiya immigrantov russkimi [Stereotype and social threat as factors of Russians perception of immigrants]. Vestnik Permskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta iskusstva i kul’tury = Bulletin of the Perm State Institute of Art and Culture, 2007, no. 3(1), pp. 57—69. (In Russ.).
9. Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press, 1957. 291 p.
10. Förster J., Liberman N., Kuschel S. The effect of global versus local processing styles on assimilation versus contrast in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2008, no. 94(4), pp. 579—599. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.579
11. Green L.J.S., Luck C.C., Gawronski B., Lipp O.V. Contrast effects in backward evaluative conditioning: Exploring effects of affective relief/disappointment versus instructional information. Emotion, 2021, no. 21(2), pp. 350—359. DOI:10.1037/emo0000701
12. Haselton M.G., Buss D.M. Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000, no. 78(1), pp. 81—91. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.81
13. Hu X., Gawronski B., Balas R. Propositional versus dual-process accounts of evaluative conditioning: I. The effects of cooccurrence and relational information on implicit and explicit evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2017a, no. 43(1), pp. 17—32. DOI:10.1177/0146167216673351
14. Hu X., Gawronski B., Balas R. Propositional versus dual-process accounts of evaluative conditioning: II. The effectiveness of counter-conditioning and counter-instructions in changing implicit and explicit evaluations. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 2017б, no. 8(8), pp. 858—866. DOI:10.1177/1948550617691094
15. Jones S.C., Panitch D. The self-fulfilling prophecy and interpersonal attraction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1971, no. 7(3), pp. 356—366. DOI:10.1016/0022- 1031(71)90034-5
16. Ledgerwood A., Chaiken S. Priming us and them: Automatic assimilation and contrast in group attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2007, no. 93(6), pp. 940—956. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.940
17. Mallan K.M., Lipp O.V., Libera M. Affect, attention, or anticipatory arousal? Human blink startle modulation in forward and backward affective conditioning. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2008, no. 69(1), pp. 9—17. DOI:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.02.005
18. Merton R.K. “The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy”. The Antioch Review, 1948, no. 8(2), pp. 193—210. DOI:10.2307/4609267
19. Moran T., Bar-Anan Y. The effect of object-valence relations on automatic evaluation. Cognition and Emotion, 2013, no. 27(4), pp. 743—752. DOI:10.1080/02699931.2012.732040
20. Olson M.A., Fazio R.H. Implicit attitude formation through classical conditioning. Psychological Science, 2001, no. 12(5), pp. 413—417. DOI:10.1111/1467-9280.00376
21. Rau R., Carlson E.N., Back M.D., Barranti M., Gebauer J.E., Human L.J., Leising D., Nestler S. What is the structure of perceiver effects? On the importance of global positivity and trait-specificity across personality domains and judgment contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2021, no. 120(3), pp. 745—764. DOI:10.1037/pspp0000278
22. Rosenthal R., Jacobson L. Pygmalion in the classroom. Urban Review, 1968, no. 3, pp. 16—20. DOI:10.1007/BF02322211
23. Rudman L.A., Goodwin S.A. Gender differences in automatic in-group bias: why do women like women more than men like men? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2004, no. 87(4), pp. 494—509. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.494
24. Schwarz N., Bless H. Mental Construal Processes: The Inclusion/Exclusion Model. In: Stapel D.A., Suls J. (Eds.). Assimilation and contrast in social psychology. Psychology Press, 2007, pp. 119—141.
25. Sherman S.J., Gorkin L. Attitude bolstering when behavior is inconsistent with central attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1980, no. 16(4), pp. 388—403. DOI:10.1016/0022- 1031(80)90030-X
26. Snyder M., Swann W.B. Hypothesis-testing processes in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978, no. 36(11), pp. 1202—1212. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.36.11.1202
27. Stapel D.A., Koomen W. I, we, and the effects of others on me: How self-construal level moderates social comparison effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001, no. 80(5), pp. 766—781. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.80.5.766
28. Stapel D.A., Suls J. Method Matters: Effects of Explicit Versus Implicit Social Comparisons on Activation, Behavior, and Self-Views. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2004, no. 87(6), pp. 860—875. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.860