“Life Space” In the Context of Psychology of Everyday Life: to the 130th Anniversary of Kurt Lewin

The psychology of everyday life is one of the actively developing areas of modern Russian psychology. The leading theoretical and methodological sources of its development are his- tory, anthropology and sociology of everyday life at the general scientific level of knowledge. Sources at the specific scientific level are the psychopathology of everyday life by Sigmund Freud, the field theory of Kurt Lewin, and the psychological concept of Hans Thomae. The demand for the ideas of Lewin is determined today by transformations of modernity, bring- ing to the fore the issues of socio-cultural dynamics and polymotivation of an individual, the clash of values and the subject’s conscious choice of a life path, formation of identity in changing life situations, and diversity of lifestyles in a complicated society. Everyday life is multi-layered, variegated, and heterogeneous. It presents the dynamics of the visible and invisible, real and surreal, modern and archaic. To detect gradual and imperceptible changes, it is often necessary to change the methodological toolkit. Lewin’s construct of “life space” in the context of the psychology of everyday life allows one to configure various aspects of human development in a situation of sociocultural transformations where social space can be both supportive and suppressive, and the spheres of private and public, personal and professional, mix. This results in a loss of normative boundaries. Cultural-psychological time in a common geographic space flows differently for people and communities, which not only creates risks of potential conflicts by drawing fault lines in the social fabric, but also poses the problem of a description language capable of combining nomothetic (revealing trends and patterns) and idiographic (directed analysis of unique cases) discourses. Lewin solved similar methodological and socio-political problems. It seems that his approach is very productive for the diagnosis and treatment of cultural and psychological trauma in Russian society. In the article, it is emphasized that the strategy of Lewin’s “action research” is close to the social constructivism of the Russian intellectual tradition, which makes it possible to comprehend the work of a psychologist as a solution to the problems of humanizing society and the education system.

Zeigarnik B. V. Kurt Lewin’s personality theory. Moscow, Moscow State University Press, 1981. (In Russian)

Grishina N. V. Kurt Lewin: life and fate. In: Lewin K. Resolving Social Conflicts. St. Petersburg, Rech Publ., 2000, pp. 6–99. (In Russian)

Leontiev D. A., Patyaeva E. Yu. Kurt Lewin — methodologist of scientific psychology. In: Lewin K. Dynamic psychology. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2001, pp. 3–20. (In Russian)

Grishina N. V., Kostromina S. N. (eds). Life Space in Psychology: Theory and Phenomenology. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg State University Press, 2020. (In Russian)

Grishina N. V. Everyday behavior: life style, everyday creativity and life design. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia, 2017, vol. 10, no. 56, p. 2. Available at: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/eng/2017v10n56e/1509-grishina56e.html (accessed: 28.10.2020). (In Russian)

Guseltseva M. S. Everyday life psychology: methodology, history and perspectives.Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia, 2017, vol. 10, no. 51, p. 12. Available at: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/eng/2017v10n51e/1399-guseltseva51e.html (accessed: 28.10.2020). (In Russian)

Martsinkovskaya T. D. Psychology of everyday life: an oxymoron or a new trend in psychology.Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia, 2017, vol. 10, no. 56, p. 1. Available at: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/eng/2017v10n56e/1508-martsinkovskaya56e.html (accessed: 28.10.2020). (In Russian)

Nartova-Bochaver S. Human environments as a source of stress and a resource to overcome it: returning to the psychology of everyday life. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2019, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 15–26. (In Russian)

Orestova V. R. Cinema and psychology of everyday life. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia, 2017, vol. 10, no. 56, p. 5. Available at: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/eng/2017v10n56e/1512-o (accessed: 28.10.2020).(In Russian)

Khoroshilov D. A. Archaeology of everyday life and social cognition. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia, 2017, vol. 10, no. 54, p. 6. Available at: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/eng/2017v10n54e/1465-khoroshilov54e.html (accessed: 28.10.2020). (in Russian)

Gusel’tseva M. S. Psychology of everyday life in the light of the methodology of latent changes. Moscow, Akropol’ Publ., 2019. (In Russian)

Lewin K. Resolving Social Conflicts. New York: Harper and Brothers Publ., 1948; Rus. ed.: St. Petersburg, Rech Publ., 2000. (In Russian)

Lewin K. Field Theory in Social Sciences: Selected theoretical papers. Ed. by D. Cartwright. New York, Harper and Row, 1951; Rus. ed.: St. Petersburg, Rech Publ., 2000. (In Russian)

Lewin K. Dynamic Psychology. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2001. (In Russian)

The myth about empire: cultural practices of our time [video of discussion]. Prokhorova, Guseinov, Aronson, Miller. Shaninka, Publ.: 2020, 9 Oct. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwPC0dHUxG4 (accessed: 27.10.2020). (In Russian)

Gaaze K. COVID-19 and the Future of Idleness. Gaaze K. et al. (eds). Goodbye COVID? Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publishing House, 2020, pp. 301–325. (In Russian)

Merton R. Self-fulfilling prophecy (Thomas’s Theorem) . Socioline.ru. 9 Fev. 2008. Available at: http://socioline.ru/node/828 (accessed: 29.10.2020). (In Russian)

Bazhanov V., Shol’ts R. V. (eds). Transdisciplinarity in philosophy and science: approaches, problems, prospects. Moscow, Navigator Publ., 2015. (In Russian)

Krastev I. After Europe. Moscow, Publishing house “Delo” RANEPA, 2018. (In Russian)

Gaaze K. et al. (eds). Goodbye COVID? Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publishing House, 2020. (In Russian)

Shulman E., Bespalova N. Nation States in a pandemic. In: Gaaze K. et al. (eds). Goodbye, COVID? Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publishing House, 2020, pp. 216–230. (In Russian)

Kalinin I. (ed.). “Cold Civil War”. The split of the Hungarian society. Moscow, New Literary Review Publ., 2009. (In Russian)

Epple N. V. An Inconvenient Past: Memory of the State Crimes in Russia and Other Countries. Moscow, New Literary Review Publ., 2020. (In Russian)

“Diletantskie chteniia” with Dmitry Bykov. Nevex.TV. 2018. 26 Dec. Available at: https://ru-bykov.livejournal.com/3701411.html (accessed: 28.10.2020). (In Russian)

Zubarevich N. V. Regions of Russia: inequality, crisis, modernization. Moscow: Independent Institute for Social Policy Publ., 2010. (In Russian)

Dzyakovich E. V. Local identities in the context of the socio-cultural dynamics of Russian regions: Abstract of Doctor’s degree dissertation. Moscow: Moscow State University of Culture and Arts, 2011. (In Russian)

Jenkins H. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York; London, 2006. Rus. ed.: Moscow: RIPOL klassik Publ., 2019.

Rogov K. (ed.). Grassroots modernization. Can society and the state move in different directions? InLiberty, 2018, 30 Nov. Available at: https://www.inliberty.ru/magazine/issue10/ (accessed: 04.01.2019). (In Russian)

Rubinstein S. L. The principle of creative spontaneous activity. Voprosy filosofii, 1989, no. 4, pp. 88–96. (In Russian)

Asmolov A. G. Optics of education: socio-cultural perspectives. Moscow, Prosveshchenie Publ., 2012. (In Russian)

Grishina N. V. Psychology of change: Kurt Lewin’s methodological proposals. In: Grishina N. V.,

Kostromina S. N. (eds). Life Space in Psychology: Theory and Phenomenology. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg State University Press, 2020, pp. 124–148. (In Russian)

Bourdieu P. Social Space: Fields and Practice. St. Petersburg, Aleteiya Publ., 2005. (In Russian)

Bauman Z. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge, Polity, 2000. Rus. ed.: St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2008.

Harrison L., Huntington S. (eds). Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress. New York, 2000. Rus. ed.: Moscow: Moskovskaia shkola politicheskikh issledovanii Press, 2002.

Popper K. The Open Society and Its Enemies. London, 1945. Rus. ed.: Moscow: Kul’turnaia initsiativa Publ., 1992.