To the Research of the Age Identification of an Adult

The article is devoted to the problem of studying the age identification of an adult. The aim of the paper is to study age identification in the periods of early and middle adulthood in relation to subjective age and markers of psychological well-being. Hypothesis: age identification is based on comparing oneself with peers and attitude to age periods close to the age of a respondent; it is characterized by qualitative, typological differences, has a connection with subjective age. The results of two studies conducted on different age groups are presented: the group of early adulthood (N=70, 19–26 years; average age 23.6 years) and the group of middle adulthood (N=60, 27–46 years; average age 34 years). As the main method of age identification research, the method of semantic differential with the next scales was used: strength, activity, evaluation, complexity, orderliness. In the group of early adulthood, the categories “I”, “Peer”, “Childhood”, “Adulthood” were offered for evaluation, in the group of middle adulthood — “I”, “Peer”, “Youth”, “Old Age”. Subjective and ideal age (questionnaire), indicators of psychological well-being (a short version of the C.Riff scale in the adaptation of E.G.Tro shikhina) and life satisfaction (questionnaire of E.Diener in the adaptation of D.A.Leontiev, E.N.Osin) were also measured. Results: with the help of factor analysis, age identification patterns were identified in each of the age groups. They differ by the degree of awareness, the significance of age characteristics in the structure of self-identification and the degree of consistency. In early adulthood, the relationship between the patterns of age identification, chronological and subjective age is not traced, to a greater extent, subjective adulthood is influenced by professional status (job availability). In middle adulthood, multiple significant relationships were revealed, confirming the possibility of studying the content aspects of age identification using a semantic differential.

Aleksandrova, O. V., Dermanova, I. B. (2018). Semantic differential of a life situation. Konsul’tativnaia psikhologiia i psikhoterapiia, 26, 3, 127–145. https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2018260307

Bellingtier, J. A., Neupert, S. D. (2019). Daily subjective age in emerging adults: “Now we’re stressed out”. Emerging Adulthood, 7 (6), 468–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696818785081

Bellingtier, J. A., Neupert, S. D., Kotter-Grühn, D. (2017). The combined effects of daily stressors and major life events on daily subjective ages. The Journals of Gerontology: Ser. B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 72 (4), 613–621. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv101

Belopol’skaia, N. L. (1998). Gender and age identification. Methods for studying children’s self-consciousness.  Moscow, Kogito-Tsentr Publ.

Belopol’skaia, N. L. (2010). Experimental study of age-identification in people with suicidal attempts. Psikhologicheskaia nauka i obrazovanie,  15, 2, 125–133.

Belopol’skaia, N. L., Ivanova, S. R., Svistunova, E. V., Shafirova, E. M. (2007). Self-consciousness of troubled teenagers.  Moscow, Institut psikhologii RAN Press.

Eidel’man A. B. (2019). Features of subjective age and psychological well-being at early age. Vestnik KGU. Pedagogika. Psikhologiia. Sotsiokinetika,  2, 30–35.

Erikson, E. (1996). Identity: youth and crisis,  transl. by A. V. Tolstykh. Moscow, Progress Publ.

Infurna, F. J., Gerstorf, D., Lachman, M. E. (2020). Midlife in the 2020s: Opportunities and challenges. The American psychologist, 75 (4), 470–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000591

Kurysheva, O. V. (2010). The subjective age as a category of self-esteem. Izvestiia VGPU,  155–158.

Manukian, V. R. (2022). Growing up of youth: Separation from parents, subjective adulthood and psychological well-being at the age of 18–27. Psikhologicheskaia nauka i obrazovanie, 27, 3, 129–140. https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2022270310

Mikliaeva, A. V., Rumiantseva, P. V. (2009). The structure of a person’s social identity: Age dynamics. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta,  5, 129–133.

Montepare, J. M. (2020). Publisher correction to: An exploration of subjective age, actual age, age awareness, and engagement in every day. European Journal of Ageing, 17, 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-020-00580-9

Petrenko, V. F. (1983). Introduction to experimental psychosemantics: the study of forms of representation in ordinary consciousness.  Moscow, Moscow University Press.

Psycho-emotional wellbeing: integrative approach  (2020). L. A. Golovei (ed.). St. Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriia Publ.

Sayag, M., Kavé, G. (2022). The effects of social comparisons on subjective age and self-rated health. Ageing & Society, 42 (9), 2140–2153. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X20002056

Sergienko, E. A. (2011). Subjective age in terms of the system-subject approach. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta,  153, 5, 89–101.

Sergienko, E. A. (2013). Subjective and chronological human age. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia, 6, 30. https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v6i30.689

Sergienko, E. A. (2018). Subjective human age — expansion of the concept of age identity. In: Kategorii psikhologii  (pp. 579–609). Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Press.

Sergienko, E. A., Eidel’man, G. N. (2015). Age identification of modern youth as the factor of self-determination. Obrazovanie i samorazvitie,  3, 45, 62–72.

Wurm, S., Diehl, M., Kornadt, A. E., Westerhof, G. J., Wahl, H. W. (2017). How do views on aging affect health outcomes in adulthood and late life? Explanations for an established connection. Developmental Review, 46, 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2017.08.002