Married Couples: the Significance of Psychological Wellbeing and Subjective Loneliness for Feelings of Love

112

Abstract

Married couples are attracting attention of psychologists. Generally, feelings of love are studied as a predictor, and psychological wellbeing as an effect of relationship satisfaction. Since feelings of love change in time, the purpose of this research is to study gender and age differences and identify predictors of love for spouse. Although relationship satisfaction probably is the strongest predictor of love, the psychological wellbeing and subjective loneliness also matters. 387 couples with marriage duration from six months to 50 years were studied. Methods: Rubin’s love and liking scale; Psychological wellbeing scale (Ryff), Loneliness scale (Russell et al.); self-report of relationship satisfaction with cognitive (satisfaction, desire to maintain marriage, divorce) and emotional (negative feelings, tension, fear of parting) issues. Dispersion, correlation, factorial and regression analysis were used. Results: Men’s love is stronger than women’s one and more stable throughout marriage. The lowest relationship satisfaction and the most pronounced love were found in 3–7 years of marriage. Common predictors of love for a partner are relationship satisfaction and the partner’s psychological wellbeing; a specific predictor for men is a low level of subjective loneliness, and for women it is the husband’s love for her, his subjective loneliness and her fear of parting. Spouses who express a desire to divorce are characterized by weak love for a partner, men are not satisfied with the relationship and both spouses have a reduced level of psychological wellbeing: women are not competent enough, men have difficulty setting life goals, and both partners have low self-acceptance.

General Information

Keywords: marriage, romantic love, relationship satisfaction, psychological wellbeing, subjective loneliness, fear of parting

Journal rubric: Empirical and Experimental Research

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2024.107

Received: 01.09.2023

Accepted:

For citation: Troshikhina E.G. Married Couples: the Significance of Psychological Wellbeing and Subjective Loneliness for Feelings of Love. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 2024. Vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 113–127. DOI: 10.21638/spbu16.2024.107. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

Abreu-Afonso, J., Ramos, M. M., Queiroz-Garcia, I., Leal, I. (2022). How couple’s relationship lasts over time? A model for marital satisfaction. Psychological reports, 125 (3), 1601–1627. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211000651

Aleshina, Yu. E. (1987). The cycle of family development: Research and problems. Vestnik of Moscow University. Ser. 14. Psychology,  2, 18–26. (In Russian)

Aleshina, Yu. E., Gozman, L. Ya., Dubovskaya, E. M. (1987). Socio-psychological Methods of Studying Marital Relations.  Moscow, Moscow University Press. (In Russian)

Cassepp-Borges, V. (2021). Should I stay or should I go? Relationship satisfaction, love, love styles and religion compatibility predicting the fate of relationships. Sexuality and Culture, 25, 871–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09798-2

Chapman, B., Guven, C. (2016). Revisiting the relationship between marriage and wellbeing: Does marriage quality matter? Journal of Happiness Studies, 17 (2), 533–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9607-3

Fomina, N. A., Proshlyakov, I. A. (2022). Harmonizing women’s personality to increase their satisfaction with marriage. Man and Education, 3, 86–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.54884/S181570410023216-2 (In Russian)

Goodman, F. R., Disabato, D. J., Kashdan, T. B. (2020). Reflections on unspoken problems and potential solutions for the well-being juggernaut in positive psychology. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 16, 831–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1818815

Grevenstein, D., Bluemke, M., Schweitzer, J., Aguilar-Raab, C. (2019). Better family relationships — higher well-being: The connection between relationship quality and health related resources. Mental Health and Prevention, 14, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.101 6/J. MPH. 2019.200160

Grishina, N. V. (2022). Self-changes: Situational determinants. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 12 (2), 172–185. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2022.206 (In Russian)

Hsu, T. L., Barrett, A. E. (2020). The association between marital status and psychological well-being: Variation across negative and positive dimensions. Journal of Family Issues, 41 (11), 2179–2202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X20910184

Karney, B. R., Bradbury, T. N. (2020). Research on marital satisfaction and stability in the 2010s: Challenging conventional wisdom. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82 (1), 100–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12635

Kazim, S. M., Rafique, R. (2021). Predictors of marital satisfaction in individualistic and collectivist cultures: a mini review. Journal of research in psychology, 3 (1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.31580/jrp.v3i1.1958

Kharchev, A. G., Matskovsky, M. S. (1978). Modern family and its problems.  Moscow: Statistika Publ. (In Russian)

Kozhukhar, G. S. (2021). The quality of interpersonal relationships and satisfaction with the marriage of young people. Social Psychology and Society, 12 (1), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2021120110 (In Russian)

Langeslag, S. J. E., Surti, K. (2022). Increasing love feelings, marital satisfaction, and motivated attention to the spouse. Journal of Psychophysiology, 36 (4), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803/a000294

Liu, W., Guo, Z., Chen, R. (2020). Lonely heart? Warm it up with love: The effect of loneliness on singles’ and non-singles’ conspicuous consumption. European Journal of Marketing, 54 (7), 1523–1548. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-01-2018-0054

Manalel, J. A., Birditt, K. S., Orbuch, T. L., Antonucci, T. C. (2019). Beyond destructive conflict: Implications of marital tension for marital well-being. Journal of Family Psychology, 33 (5), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000512

Novak, J. R., Wilson, S. J., Ermer, A. E., Harper, J. M. (2023). Aging together: Dyadic profiles of older couples’ marital quality, psychological well-being, and physical health. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40 (6), 1897–1919. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221135451

Orosz, G., Szekeres, Á., Kiss, Z. G., Farkas, P., Roland-Lévy, C. (2015). Elevated romantic love and jealousy if relationship status is declared on Facebook*. Front. Psychol. 6, 214. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00214

Poznyakov, V. P., Poddubny, S. E. (2023). Personal characteristics of young people, partners in couples with different status of close relationships. Yaroslavl pedagogical bulletin, 2, 119–128. http://dx.doi.org/10.20323/1813-145X_2023_2_131_119 (In Russian)

Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., Ferguson, M. L. (1978). Developing a measure of loneliness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 42, 290–294. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4203_11

Ryff, C. D., Boylan, J. M., Kirsch, J. A. (2021). Eudaimonic and hedonic well-being: An integrative perspective with linkages to sociodemographic factors and health. In: Lee M. T., Kybzansky, L. D., Vander-Weele, T. J. (eds). Measuring Well-Being: Interdisciplinary Perspectives from the Social Sciences and the Humanities  (pp. 92–135). Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Singh, Y., Gupta, V., Srivastava, A. K. (2023). Marital conflict, health, and well-being among couples. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 11 (1). https://doi.org/10.25215/1101.112

Tavakol, Z., Nikbakht Nasrabadi, A., Behboodi Moghadam, Z., Salehiniya, H., Rezaei, E. (2017). A review of the factors associated with marital satisfaction. Galen Medical Journal, 6 (3), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v6i3.641

Tikhomirova, E. V., Samokhvalova, A. G., Saporovskaya, M. V., Khazova, S. A. (2023). Specifics of close relationships at different stages of adulthood in the modern world. Russian psychological journal, 20 (2), 185–210. https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2023.2.12

Zhukovskaya, L. V., Troshikhina, E. G. (2011). C. Ryff’s scale of Psychological Well-being. Psychological Journal, 32 (2), 82–93. (In Russian)

Information About the Authors

Evgenia G. Troshikhina, PhD in Psychology, Docent, Associate Professor, Faculty of Psychology, Developmental and Differential Psychology Department, St.Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5739-2963, e-mail: e.troshikhina@spbu.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 126
Previous month: 29
Current month: 11

Downloads

Total: 112
Previous month: 15
Current month: 16