Reflection in Practice and Science

Abstract

In modern science, authors within various scientific branches and practical approaches actively research the reflective processes. This article provides an outlook of understanding "reflection" concept in Russian pedagogy, psychology and analyses it in the framework of network approach as a dialogical, co-creative process.

General Information

Keywords: dialogue, emotional experience, self-reflection, self-consciousness, Russian psychology, Russian education

Publication rubric: Theory and Methodology

For citation: Snurnikova N.N. Reflection in Practice and Science [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psychology Review, 2010. Vol. 2, no. 2010-1

A Part of Article

 

Full text

What is drifting is a boat. But what allows it to drift is water, not a boat. What is moving is a carriage. But what allows it to move is an ox, not a carriage. Reflection is mind. But what makes it possible to reflect is will, not mind. It is impossible to know why everything is the way it is. Only not knowing why everything is the way it is, you do not long for what is coming, and are not drawn to what is passing. Chinese proverb

Reflection (from the Latin reflexio - to bend back) is an important component of any activity, especially in the psychological process. Reflection is given a great amount of attention in work with social networks, so we will try to examine various approaches to its definition and application.

The concept reflection is rooted in philosophy and refers to a process of meditation by an individual about what happens in his or her own consciousness. Descartes equates it with the ability of individuals to concentrate on their own thought content, disengaged from everything external and bodily. J. Lock distinguished between the concepts of sensation and reflection, in which reflection represents a specific source of knowledge (internal experience) compared with sensation (external experience), which is based on sense organs' perceptions and sensations.

Different approaches in defining reflection

In modern science, authors within various scientific branches and practical approaches actively research the reflective processes:

Area of Knowledge

Reflection definition

Correlation with the network approach

In philosophy

 

A type (form) of theoretical activity directed toward the comprehension of its own acts and the laws by which they are performed.

An internal activity, directed not by its own comprehen­sion, but by comprehension of a situation or a problem to subsequently find a way out of it.

 

In psychology

 

Process of self-knowledge of a subject of his psychic acts and conditions (the basis of introspective psychology).

The process of comprehension of another person's condition via empathy and the contemplation of him/ her.

 

In social psychology

 

Comprehension by a subject (a group, community), how they are understood and accepted by other partners in the communication.

 

Understanding another per­son via the contemplation of him/her.

 

In  pedagogy

Correlation with norms and standards.  For Davydov, Neverovitch and Samokina (1972), the concept of reflection as a specific cognitive act lies in the specification of knowledge, in the clarification of foundation of knowledge, and   in  revealing   their essence   via   analysis   and   generalisation. Slastenin (n.d.) gives the following definition: 'Reflection includes building conclusions, generalisations, analogies, comparisons and  evaluations, and also emotional experience, remembering and solving problems. It also includes addressing beliefs for interpretation, analysis, realisation of acts, discussion or evaluation.'

Every   person   is   unique; there are no standards with which to compare him or her. A situation becomes clarified, analyzed, but not evaluated.

 

Conceptions of a situation  and the problems of participants of a network session building can be specified, extended, revealed and generalized.

 

Developed by Semjonov and Stepanov (1992), the typology of reflection differentiates into intellectual, personal, dialogic, communicative, cooperative, cultural and existential. The last type of reflection is correlated most with the network approach, for it is connected with a person's own comprehension of his or her existence and essence, and with re-thinking the discrepancy of existence. Existential reflection merges during unstable conditions; it is revealed in interaction with the problematic world around us and is resolved during the process of overcoming problematic situations, which is the existential ecology of personal development.

Such a definition of reflection overcomes the limited nature of the rational understanding of it only as comprehension and criticality, which in turn complies only with intellectual and, partly, cooperative reflection as the premise for cognitive and designing activities. Other types of reflection - personal, dialogical, cultural and existential - take place not only in forms of rationalized reasoning, but mostly in intuitive insights, heuristic discernments and irrational sensible penetration in an underlying theme of phenomenology of existence. This existence is revealed through the interaction and dialogue between a person and the world. It is this interaction, presented in social-ecological theory, from which the network method and implementation of reflection in network therapy are based. Taking this into consideration, networking with social contacts is impossible if the specialist has not developed rational and particularly irrational forms of reflection. Without this, it is impossible to become part of the experience of comprehending objective reality or to feel the inner world of another person and to understand the principles of that person's rational behaviour and actions.

One of the ways to cultivate existential reflection is through living experience of psychological work with meanings and the development of a critical (creative) thinking regarding personality.

Currently, the implementation of reflection in psychotherapeutic practice is being strongly emphasized. Vasiljuk (1984) reveals his typology of emotional experience as being meditated by levels of consciousness and singles out a level of reflection. In this regime of consciousness' functioning, both the subject of reflection and the observer are active. Reflection is combined with a clear or unclear norm or value through which a person evaluates his or her activities. The result of reflection is revealed by its contradiction between a norm (value) and the real foundations of actions (behaviour, acts). This allows for a first time compre­hension about what is going on and stimulates reflection on whether there is an original value or foundations of actions. In other words, reflection does not entail attention only to a certain deed, but to its inner foundations of values as well.

The author of this approach recommends the principle of 'psychotherapeutic maieutic' for guidance on working with this level of reflection. Maieutic is the 'method of dialectical debates of Socrates that consists of finding contradiction in an interlocutor's argumentations and bringing him to the truth by skillfully asked questions' (Vasiljuk, 1984).

Reflective ability

Within a reflective-humanistic approach, the mechanism of reflection is under­stood as the comprehension and re-comprehension of stereotypes of thinking and their heuristic overtones to the extent that it creates new (creative-innovative) contents of thinking. This approach examines main reflective-psychological terms: reflectivity, reflective ability, reflective readiness and reflective competency. Reflectivity is a characteristic of personality types, value orientation, ways of vital functions, distinctive features of people's communication and their interaction, during the process of which reflection develops.

Reflective ability is the ability of a subject (individual or group) to reflect on the various types and areas of its activities, i.e. it is the ability to impart a reflective quality upon any process (including the process of network therapy) and a functional structure.

Readiness for the actualisation and realisation of reflective ability is called reflective readiness, which allows for the inclusion of reflectivity in the present conditions of a person or any other system.

Reflective competence is a professional feature of the personality which allows for the reflective processes to be carried out and for the effective and adequate realisation of reflective ability. This promotes creative approaches and provides the process with maximum effectiveness.

Reflective competency is a complex formation. An individual can be the subject of reflection: knowledge about role structure and positional organisation of collective interaction; notions about the inner world of another person and reasons for his or her acts; his or her own acts, behaviour and images of his or her own 'self as an individual.

It is important to elucidate those perspectives of the interpretation of reflec­tion that allow a therapist to optimise the reflective competency of pedagogical, parental, child and other associations in crisis situations. Among the many definitions of reflection, it is appropriate to appeal to the one that has the most psychological context. One definition is as follows:

Reflection is a multilevel process of realisation by a person of his or her foundations, means and ways, behaviour, activities, subjective condition and realisation of 'self (in conflict or problematic situations), and also his or her understanding self-consciousness and the inner world of others.

In the network method, reflection can be expressed in the following forms:

  1. An analysis of knowledge for the purpose of obtaining new knowledge, or the transformation of unclear knowledge into clear knowledge;
  2. Observations of process and condition;
  3. An exit from routine, and the ability to sense and distinguish among the polyphony of opinions and voices;
  4. An act of research directed by a person to a problem and situation and the search for new alternatives to a way out.

Currently, the implementation of reflection in psychotherapeutic practice is being strongly emphasized. Vasiljuk (1984) reveals his typology of emotional experience as being meditated by levels of consciousness and singles out a level of reflection. In this regime of consciousness' functioning, both the subject of reflection and the observer are active. Reflection is combined with a clear or unclear norm or value through which a person evaluates his or her activities. The result of reflection is revealed by its contradiction between a norm (value) and the real foundations of actions (behaviour, acts). This allows for a first time compre­hension about what is going on and stimulates reflection on whether there is an original value or foundations of actions. In other words, reflection does not entail attention only to a certain deed, but to its inner foundations of values as well.

The author of this approach recommends the principle of 'psychotherapeutic maieutic' for guidance on working with this level of reflection. Maieutic is the 'method of dialectical debates of Socrates that consists of finding contradiction in an interlocutor's argumentations and bringing him to the truth by skillfully asked questions' (Vasiljuk, 1984).

Self-reflection and self-consciousness

Modem therapy practice regards reflection as a necessary foundation for personal growth, responsible choice, peace of mind and psychosomatic health. In the reflective layer of consciousness, an understanding of meanings takes place; meanings become objective, actions correlate with motives, and processes with personal specifics take place. In this case, self-reflection is when an individual his or her self, his or her needs, motives and meanings become the subject of reflection. Self-reflection is closely connected with self-consciousness. The renowned Russian psychologist L. S. Vygotskiy considered self-reflection as one of the leading factors in the development of personality and pointed out the 'deep difference between a non-reflecting, naive personality structure, on the one hand, and a reflecting personality structure, on the other. Reflection can have a restructuring influence on the individual (self-setting).'

In this context, reflection is not only self-understanding and self-knowledge; it also includes such processes as understanding and correlation with others. Reflection helps to reach a correlation of one's own consciousness, values and opinions with the values, opinions and relations of other people, groups, society and, finally, the whole of humankind.

To reflect something means to 'endure', to 'sift through one's inner world', to 'over-think'. In the network process, to reflect means to give a non-evaluative, empathic reverse connection to what was heard, seen and deeply felt at a session.

We see reality, not the way it is, but the way we are able to see it being the way we are and through the means of vision at our disposal. Yet, we often lack an understanding of our own point of view and the restriction of our own vision and may be convinced that our world vision is the only right and possible one. One person alone cannot construct a holistic picture of the world, and one person alone cannot explain it. We perceive the world uniquely and problems arise when we start arguing over whose perception is the right one.

Often, the problem is that the individual, due to certain reasons, does not accept suggestions by someone else as options for problem solving. Such reasons can be economic, political, cultural, religious, theoretical, practical and/or relate to differences in ethnicity or culture. Accordingly, for a learned person, there is a great amount of 'truths' that are, at times, mutually exclusive.

The world of reflection is diverse, plentiful and unique to every person. In particular, the ability to reflect gives the individual the opportunity to form images and meanings of life and actions and to block what he or she considers ineffective 'schemes'. An important characteristic of reflective individuals is their ability to control their own activities in accordance with their personal values and meanings and to form and switch to new mechanisms to change circumstances, goals and tasks or activities. Reflection provides a comprehension of the past and the ability to anticipate the future.

Modem therapy practice regards reflection as a necessary foundation for personal growth, responsible choice, peace of mind and psychosomatic health. In the reflective layer of consciousness, an understanding of meanings takes place; meanings become objective, actions correlate with motives, and processes with personal specifics take place. In this case, self-reflection is when an individual his or her self, his or her needs, motives and meanings become the subject of reflection. Self-reflection is closely connected with self-consciousness. The renowned Russian psychologist L. S. Vygotskiy considered self-reflection as one of the leading factors in the development of personality and pointed out the 'deep difference between a non-reflecting, naive personality structure, on the one hand, and a reflecting personality structure, on the other. Reflection can have a restructuring influence on the individual (self-setting).'

In this context, reflection is not only self-understanding and self-knowledge; it also includes such processes as understanding and correlation with others. Reflection helps to reach a correlation of one's own consciousness, values and opinions with the values, opinions and relations of other people, groups, society and, finally, the whole of humankind.

To reflect something means to 'endure', to 'sift through one's inner world', to 'over-think'. In the network process, to reflect means to give a non-evaluative, empathic reverse connection to what was heard, seen and deeply felt at a session.

We see reality, not the way it is, but the way we are able to see it being the way we are and through the means of vision at our disposal. Yet, we often lack an understanding of our own point of view and the restriction of our own vision and may be convinced that our world vision is the only right and possible one. One person alone cannot construct a holistic picture of the world, and one person alone cannot explain it. We perceive the world uniquely and problems arise when we start arguing over whose perception is the right one.

Often, the problem is that the individual, due to certain reasons, does not accept suggestions by someone else as options for problem solving. Such reasons can be economic, political, cultural, religious, theoretical, practical and/or relate to differences in ethnicity or culture. Accordingly, for a learned person, there is a great amount of 'truths' that are, at times, mutually exclusive.

The world of reflection is diverse, plentiful and unique to every person. In particular, the ability to reflect gives the individual the opportunity to form images and meanings of life and actions and to block what he or she considers ineffective 'schemes'. An important characteristic of reflective individuals is their ability to control their own activities in accordance with their personal values and meanings and to form and switch to new mechanisms to change circumstances, goals and tasks or activities. Reflection provides a comprehension of the past and the ability to anticipate the future.

Source: Social Networking with Russian Families in Crisis. - Stockholm University - Department of Social Work - International Projects , 2007.

References

  1. Davydov V.V., Neverovich S.D., Samokhina I.V. (1972) K probleme psikhologii refleksii i organizatsii funktsiy. (On the psychology of reflection and the organization of functions).
  2. Semyonov I.N., Stepanov S.Y. (1992) Refleksivnaya psikhologiya i pedagogika tvorcheskogo myshleniya. (Reflexive psychology and pedagogy of creative thinking).
  3. Semyonov I.N., Stepanov S.Y. (1990) Refleksivnie protsessy i tvorchestvo. (Reflexive processes and creativity).
  4. Vasilyuk F.E. (1984) Psikhologiya perezhivaniya (analiz preodoleniya kriticheskih situatsiy) (The psychology of emotional experiences (analysis of critical situations overcoming).
  5. Vygotskiy L.S. Psikhologia iskusstva (The psychology of art)

Information About the Authors

N. N. Snurnikova, Psychologist and Researcher, "Otradnoe" Social-Rehabilitation Centre, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: snatalian@yandex.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 424
Previous month: 1
Current month: 0