Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2019. Vol. 10, no. 4)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

Social Psychology and Society

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 2221-1527

ISSN (online): 2311-7052

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2010

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

 

Trust as a moderator of attitude towards ethnic diversity and acculturation expectations of the host population 270

Tatarko A.N.
Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia
e-mail: tatarko@yandex.ru

Lepshokova Z.K.
PhD in Psychology, Senior Research Fellow, International Scientific-Educational Laboratory for Socio-Cultural Research, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia
e-mail: taimiris@yandex.ru

Dubrov D.I.
Researcher Fellow, International Laboratory for Socio-Cultural Research, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia
e-mail: ddubrov@hse.ru

Abstract
We studied the role of generalized trust as a moderator of attitude towards ethnic diversity and acculturation expectations such as «integration» and «assimilation». In the process of theoretical analysis, two assumptions are made. (1) the higher the acceptance of ethnic diversity, the higher the orientation towards acculturation expectation «integration» and the lower the acculturation expectation «assimilation». (2) there is a difference in the relationship between attitudes towards ethnic diversity and acculturation expectations: in the case of negative attitudes towards ethnic diversity, people with higher trust will more prefer integration and less assimilation than people with lower trust. The sample of the study consisted of 198 Russian respondents (59 men and 139 women, mean age 24) who were born or lived more than 10 years in Moscow. Tools of research: methods of trust evaluation by T. Yamagishi [50]; questionnaire to assess the degree of acceptance of the identity of ethnic diversity [23]; an adapted method of assessing acculturation expectations by John. Berry [5]. The study confirmed the assumption that trust is a moderator of the relationship between attitudes towards ethnic diversity and acculturation expectations. The article discusses the meaning of the found moderation.

Keywords: trust, socio-psychological capital of a person, acculturation expectations, ethnic diversity

Column: Empirical Research

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2019100106

For Reference

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Fundamental Research (Project No. 16-36-01058-ОGN)

References
  1. Antonenko I.V. Doverie: social`no psixologicheskij fenomen [Trust: socio-psychological phenomenon]. Moscow: Socium, 2004. 319 p.
  2. Veselov Y.V. Sociologicheskaya teoriya doveriya [A sociological theory of trust]. In Y.V. Veselov (ed.). E`konomika i sociologiya doveriya [Economics and sociology of trust]. St. Petersburg: Sociol. ob-vo im. M.M. Kovalevskogo, 2004, pp. 16—32.
  3. Zabolotnaya G.M. Fenomen doveriya i ego social`ny`e funkcii [The phenomenon of trust and its social functions]. Vestnik RUDN, 2003. Vol. 4, pp. 79—85.
  4. Kuprejchenko A. B. Psixologiya doveriya i nedoveriya [Psychology of trust and distrust]. Moscow: Institut psixologii RAN, 2008. 571 p.
  5. Lebedeva N.M., Tatarko A.N. Strategii mezhe`tnicheskogo vzaimodejstviya migrantov i naseleniya Rossii [Strategies of interethnic interaction between migrants and the Russian population]. Moscow: RUDN, 2009. 420 p.
  6. Lepshokova Z.K., Tatarko A.N. Adaptation and modification of John Berry’s measure of acculturation expectations. Sotsial’naia psikhologiia i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 2017. Vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 125—146. doi:10.17759/sps.2017080310 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
  7. Tatarko A.N. Social`no-psixologicheskij kapital lichnosti v polikul`turnom obshhestve [Socio-psychological capital of a person in a multicultural society]. Moscow: Institut psixologii RAN, 2014. 384 p.
  8. Tatarko A.N. Relationship between Trust and Acculturation Attitudes (With Ukrainians in Russia and Russians in Latvia as an Example). Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural-Historical Psychology], 2016. Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 76—84. doi:10.17759/ chp.2016120108. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
  9. Fukuyama F. Doverie: social`ny`e dobrodeteli i put` k proczvetaniyu [Trust: social virtues and the road to prosperity]. Moscow, 2004. 730 p.
  10. Alesina A., La Ferrara E. Who trusts others? J. Pub. Econ, 2002. Vol. 85 (2), pp. 207—234.
  11. Barrette G., Bourhis R.Y., Personnaz M., Personnaz B. Acculturation orientations of French and North African undergraduates in Paris. International Journ. of Intercultural Relations, 2004. Vol. 28 (5), pp. 415—438.
  12. Berry, J.W., Kalin, R., Taylor, D. Multiculturalism and Ethnic Attitudes in Canada. Ottawa: Ministry of Supply and Services, 1977. 359 p.
  13. Berry J.W., Kalin R. Multicultural and ethnic attitudes in Canada: An overview of the 1991 national survey. Canadian Journ. of Behavioural Science, 1995. Vol. 27, pp. 301—320.
  14. Berry J.W. Contexts of Acculturation. In Berry J.W., Phinney L.S., Sam D.L., Vedder P.M. (ed.). Immigrant Youth in Cultural Transition. N.Y.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2006, pp. 27—42.
  15. Bilodeaua A., White S. Trust among recent immigrants in Canada: levels, roots and implications for immigrant integration. Journ. of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2016. Vol. 42 (8), pp. 1317—1333.
  16. Bourhis R.Y., Moise L.C., Perreault S., Senecal S. Towards an Interactive Acculturation Model: A Social Psychological Approach. International Journ. of Psychology, 1997. Vol. 32 (6), pp. 369—386.
  17. Bourhis R.Y., Barrette G., El-Geledi S., Schmidt R. Acculturation orientations and social relations between immigrant and host community members in California // Journ. of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2009. Vol. 40 (3), pp. 443—467.
  18. Bourhis R.Y., Montreuil A. Methodological issues related to the host community acculturation scale (HCAS) and the immigrant acculturation scale (IAS): An update UQAM Working Paper, Département de Psychologie, Université du Québec à Montréal, 2013.
  19. Brown R.J., Zagefka H. The dynamics of acculturation: An intergroup perspective. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology. San Diego: Academic Press (Elsevier), 2011. Vol. 44, pp. 129—184.
  20. Ferres N., Connell J., Travaglione A. Co-worker trust as a social catalyst for constructive employee attitudes. Journ. of Managerial Psychology, 2004. Vol. 19(6), pp. 608—622.
  21. Ferrin D. L., Bligh M. C., Kohles J. C. Can I Trust You to Trust Me? A Theory of Trust, Monitoring, and Cooperation in Interpersonal and Intergroup Relationships. Group & Organization Management, 2007. Vol. 32(4), pp. 465—499.
  22. Flanagan C. Trust, Identity, and Civic Hope. Applied Developmental Science, 2003. Vol. 7 (3), pp. 165—171.
  23. Florack A., Bless H., Piontkowski U. When do people accept cultural diversity? Affect as determinant. International Journ. of Intercultural Relations, 2003. Vol. 27 (6), pp. 627—640.
  24. Guenzi P., Georges L. Interpersonal trust in commercial relationships: Antecedents and consequences of customer trust in the salesperson. European Journ. of Marketing, 2010. Vol. 44 (1/2), pp. 114—138.
  25. Han S. Attachment insecurity and openness to diversity: The roles of self-esteem and trust. Personality and Individual Differences, 2017. Vol. 111, pp. 291—296.
  26. Hayes A.F. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. N.Y.: Guilford Publications, 2013. 507 p.
  27. Hendriks M., Bartram D. Macro-conditions and immigrants’ happiness: Is moving to a wealthy country all that matters? Social Science Research, 2016. Vol. 56, pp. 90—107.
  28. Herreros F., Criado H. Social trust, social capital and perceptions of immigration. Political Studies. 2009. Vol. 57(2). P. 337—355.
  29. Hooghe M., Reeskens T., Stolle D., Trappers A. Ethnic Diversity and Generalized Trust in Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 2009. Vol. 42(2), pp. 198—223.
  30. Hui B.H., Chen S.X., Leung C.M., Berry J. W. Facilitating adaptation and intercultural contact: The role of integration and multicultural ideology in dominant and non-dominant groups. International Journ. Of Intercultural Relations, 2015. Vol. 45, pp. 70—84.
  31. International Migration Report, 2016. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division. United Nations. New York, 2016.
  32. Jasinskaja-Lahti I., Liebkind K., Horenczyk G., Schmitz P. The interactive nature of acculturation: Perceived discrimination, acculturation attitudes and stress among young ethnic repatriates in Finland, Israel and Germany. International Journ. of Intercultural Relations, 2003. Vol. 27 (1), pp. 79—97.
  33. Lebedeva N.M., Tatarko A.N., Berry J. Intercultural relations in Russia and Latvia: the relationship between contact and cultural security. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 2016. Vol. 9 (1), pp. 41—56.
  34. Ljujic V., Vedder P., Dekker H., van Geel M. Serbian adolescents’ Romaphobia and their acculturation orientations towards the Roma minority. International Journ. of Intercultural Relations, 2010. Vol. 36 (1), pp. 53—61.
  35. Pettigrew T. F., Tropp L. R., Wagner U., Christ O. Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. Int. J. Intercult. Relat, 2011. Vol. 35 (3), pp. 271—280.
  36. Putnam R. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. N.Y.: Simon and Schuster, 2000. 544 p.
  37. Putnam R. Social capital: measurement and consequences. Canadian Journ. of Policy Research, 2001. Vol. 2 (1), pp. 41—51.
  38. Putnam R. E Pluribus Unum: diversity and community in the twenty-first century. The 2006 Johan Skytte prize lecture. Scand. Pol. Stud, 2007. Vol. 30 (2), pp. 137—174.
  39. Sam D.L. Acculturation: Conceptual background and core components. In D.L. Sam, J.W. Berry (ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of acculturation psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 11—26.
  40. Sam D.L., Berry J.W. Introduction. In D.L. Sam, J.W. Berry (ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of acculturation psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 1—6.
  41. Stephan W. G., Ybarra O., Rios Morrison K. Intergroup threat theory. In T.D. Nelson (ed.). Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination./ N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2009, pp. 43—60.
  42. Stolle D., Soroka S., Johnston R. When does diversity erode trust? Neighborhood diversity, interpersonal trust and the mediating effect of social interactions. Political Studies, 2008. Vol. 56 (1), pp. 57—75.
  43. Strauss J.P., Connerley M.L., Ammerman P.A. The «threat hypothesis,» personality, and attitudes toward diversity. The Journ. of Applied Behavioral Science, 2003. Vol. 39, pp. 32—52.
  44. Tatarko A., Mironova A.A., van de Vijver F. Ethnic Diversity and Social Capital in the Russian Context. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2017. Vol. 48. no. 4, pp. 542 — 559.
  45. Van der Linden M, Hooghe M, de Vroome T, Van Laar C. Extending trust to immigrants: Generalized trust, cross-group friendship and anti-immigrant sentiments in 21 European societies. PLoS ONE, 2017. Vol. 12 (5): e0177369.
  46. Van Oudenhoven J.P., Ward C., Masgoret A.M. Patterns of relations between immigrants and host societies. International Journ. of Intercultural Relation, 2006. Vol. 30 (6), pp. 637 — 651.
  47. Van de Vijver F.J.R., Breugelmans S.M., Schalk-Soekar S.R.G. Multiculturalism: Construct validity and stability. International Journ. of Intercultural Relations, 2008. Vol. 32 (2), pp. 93—104.
  48. Wagner U., Christ O., Pettigrew T. F., Stellmacher J., Wolf C. Prejudice and minority proportion: contact instead of threat effects. Soc. Psychol. Quart, 2006. Vol. 69 (4), pp. 380—390.
  49. Ward C., Rana-Deuba A. Acculturation and adaptation revisited. Journ. of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 1999. Vol. 30 (4), pp. 422—442.
  50. Yamagishi T. Trust and Social Intelligence. The Evolutionary Game of Mind and Society. Tokyo: Tokyo University Press, 1998, pp. 107—171. doi:10.1007/978-4-431-53936-0
  51. Yamagishi,T. Trust as A Form of Social Intelligence. In K. Cook (ed.). Trust in Society. N.Y.: Russell Sage Foundation, 2001, pp. 121—147.

 

comments powered by Disqus
 
About PsyJournals.ru

© 2007–2020 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube ??????.???????