Russian Psychological Issues
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us
Experimental Psychology (Russia) - №1 / 2021 | Перейти к описанию
Web of Science СС

  Previous issue (2020. Vol. 13, no. 4)


Experimental Psychology (Russia)

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 2072-7593

ISSN (online): 2311-7036


License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2008

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal


Dependence of the Oppel-Kundt illusion on configuration of the components 1159


Bondarko V.M.
Doctor of Biology, Leading Research Associate, Laboratory of physiology of vision, Pavlov Institute of Physiology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St.Petersburg, Russia

Bondarko D.V.
Engineer of the Laboratory of Information Technologies and Mathematical Modeling, I. P. Pavlov Institute of Physiology RAN

Chikhman V.N.
PhD in Engineering, Senior Research Associate, Head of Laboratory of Informational Technologies and Mathematical Modeling, Pavlov Psychological Institute of Russian Academy of Science, St.Petersburg, Russia

We studied a size estimation of spatial intervals, which were limited by two straight or curved lines. Intervals widths varied from 2.56 to 3.12 deg. Additional lines could be within intervals. The task of the observers was to estimate the separation between the distant lines. Three experiments were carried out. In the first experiment, several additional lines divided spatial intervals into equal parts. Thus, we investigated the Oppel-Kundt illusion. We founded the invariant dependence of the illusion on number of lines with respect to the interval size. In the second experiment, only two additional lines were arranged inside the interval on different distances. Maximal illusion was obtained for the equal distance between the all four lines. In the third experiment, the two curved parallel lines limited spatial interval. Two other equidistant lines could be within the intervals. Revealed here illusions were greater than illusions for the intervals bounded by straight lines. Model of modules gave a good approximation to data of the Oppel-Kund illusion.

Keywords: geometric illusions, Oppel–Kundt illusion, size estimation, spatial-frequency analysis, modules model

Column: Psychology of Perception


For Reference

  1. Bertulis A., Bulatov A., Loginovich E. Vospriyatie linejnykh razmerov raznykh geometricheskikh figur [Perception of the linear sizes of different geometric shapes]. Sensornye Sistemy [Sensory Systems], 1995, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 81–85 (In Russ.).
  2. Bondarko V.M. Sopostavlenie metrik, zadannykh na prostranstve priznakov izobrazhenij, s oshibkami v opoznanii etikh izobrazhenij [A comparison of metrics defined on the image features space with errors of these images recognition]. Sensornye Sistemy [Sensory Systems], 1989, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 56–68 (In Russ.).
  3. Bondarko V.M. Danilova M.V. Razlichenie shiriny prostranstvennykh intervalov, ogranichennykh dvumya liniyami, v usloviyakh prisutstviya dopolnitelnykh bokovykh linij [Discrimination of the spatial intervals width under condition of the additional flanking lines]. Sensornye Sistemy [Sensory Systems], 1998, vol. 12, pp. 452–461 (In Russ.).
  4. Bulatov A.N., Bertulis A.V., Mitskene L.I. Kolichestvennoe issledovanie geometricheskikh illyuzij [Quantitative study of the geometric illusions]. Sensornye Sistemy [Sensory Systems], 1995, vol. 9, no. 2-3, pp. 79–89 (In Russ.).
  5. Glezer V.D. Zrenie i myshlenie [Vision and thinking]. Leningrad: Nauka, 1985. 300 p. (In Russ.).
  6. Glezer V.D.,  Chukova S.V.,  Semenov N.A.,  Kalitievskij N.F.,  Bondarko V.M.,  Gauzelman  V.E. Razlichenie prostranstvennykh intervalov mezhdu dvumya liniyami: nejrofiziologicheskoe obosnovanie psikhofizicheskogo eksperimenta [Discrimination of the spatial intervals: a neurophysiological study of the psychophysical experiments]. Fiziologiya cheloveka [Human Physiology], 1997, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 60–67 (In  Russ.).
  7. Gregori R.L. Glaz i mozg [Eye and brain]. Moscow: Progress, 1970. 143 p. (In Russ.).
  8. Atkinson J., Campbell F., Francis M. The magic number 4 +/- 0: A new look at visual numerosity.Perception, 1976, vol. 5, pp. 335-342.
  9. Bondarko V.M., Danilova M.V. Spatial interval discrimination in the presence of flanking lines. Spatial Vision, 1999, vol. 12, pp. 239-253.
  10. Brigell M., Uhlaric J., Goldhorn P. Contextual influences on judgment of linear extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 1977, vol.3, pp. 108-118. 1523.3.1.105
  11. Bulatov A., Bertulis A., Mickiene L. Geometrical illusions: Study and Modelling. Biological Cybernetics,1997, vol. 77, pp. 395–406.
  12. Coren S., Girgus J. S. Seeing is deceiving: The psychology of visual illusions. Oxford, England: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1978. 255 p.
  13. Foley J.M.,  Ribeiro-Filho  N.P., Da  Silva  J.A.  Visual perception  of  extent  and the  geometry  of  visual space. Vision Research, 2004, vol. 44, pp. 147–156. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2003.09.004
  14. Giora E., Gori S. The perceptual expansion of a filled area depends on textural characteristics. Vision research, 2010, vol. 50, pp. 2466–2475. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.08.033
  15. Gogel W.C. The validity of the size-distance invariance hypothesis with cue reduction. Perception &Psychophysics, 1971, vol. 9, pp. 92–94.
  16. Gregory R.L. Distortion of visual space as inappropriate constancy scaling. Nature, 1963, vol. 199, pp. 678-679.
  17. Higashiyama A., Adachi K. Perceived size and perceived distance of targets viewed from between the legs: Evidence for proprioceptive theory. Vision research, 2006, vol. 46, pp. 3961–3976. visres.2006.04.002
  18. Kreiner W.A. On the intensity maximum of the Oppel-Kundt illusion. 2009.
  19. Kulikowski J.J., Marcelja S., Bishop P.O. Theory of spatial position and spatial frequency relations in the receptive fields of simple cells in the visual cortex. Biological Cybernetics, 1982, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 187–198.
  20. Hess R.F., Badcock D.R. Metric for separation discrimination by the human visual system. Journal of Optical Society of America, A, 1995, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 3–16.
  21. Long G.M., Murtagh M.P. Task and Size Effects in the Oppel-Kundt and Irradiation Illusions. Journal of General Psychology, 1984, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 229-240.
  22. Rothwell B., Zaidel E. Visual field differences in the magnitude of the Opel-Kundt illusion vary with processing time. Perception & Psychophysics, 1990, vol. 47, pp. 180–190.
  23. Kisvarday Z.F., Kim D.Sh., Eysel U.T., Bonhoeffer T. Relationship between lateral inhibitory connections and the topography of the orientation map in cat visual cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience, 1994, vol. 6, pp. 1619–1632.
  24. Polat U. Sagi D. Lateral interactions between spatial channels: suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments. Vision Research, 1993, vol. 33, pp. 993–999. 6989(93)90081-7
  25. Wackermann J., Kastner K. Determinants of filled/empty optical illusion: Search for the locus of maximal effect. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 2010, vol. 70, pp. 423–434.

© 2007–2021 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License Open Access Repository     Webometrics Ranking of Repositories

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube ??????.???????