Research on Neuropsychological Profile of Children with Specific Speech Disorders



The aim of the research was to prove the assumption that children who have difficulties with understanding passive and prepositional constructions also have a low level of visual-spatial functions development. Children with specific speech disorders and control group children aged 7-8 years were studied using children's neuropsychological technique aimed at assessing various mental functions. The results for 8 tests out of 15 were obviously worse in children with speech disorders than that of control group children, including all 4 tests on visual-spatial functions. It is therefore concluded that children with specific difficulties in understanding logical and grammatical constructions have an insufficient level of simultaneous mechanism development in brain activity.

General Information

Keywords: specific speech disorders, understanding logical and grammatical constructions, visual-spatial functions, neuropsychological diagnostics, speech development, simultaneous mechanism of brain activity

Journal rubric: Empirical Research

Article type: scientific article

For citation: Kiselev S.Y., Permyakova M.Y., Lapshina Y.Y. Research on Neuropsychological Profile of Children with Specific Speech Disorders. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2007. Vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 84–92. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)


  1. Ahutina T.V., Ignat'eva S.Yu., Maksimenko M.Yu., Polonskaya N.N., Pylaeva N.M., Yablokova L.V. Metody neirop-sihologicheskogo obsledovaniya detei 6—8 let // Vestn. Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 14. Psihologiya. 1996. № 2.
  2. Ahutina T.V., Yablokova L.V., Polonskaya N.N. Neiropsihologicheskii analiz individual'nyh razlichii u detei // Neiropsihologiya i psihofiziologiya individual'nyh razlichii. M.; Orenburg, 2000.
  3. Luriya A.R. Vysshie korkovye funkcii cheloveka. M., 2000.
  4. Bishop D.V.M. Uncommon understanding: Comprehension in specific language impairment. Hove, 1997.
  5. Bishop D.V.M., Edmundson A. Language impaired four-year-olds: Distinguishing transient from persistent impairment // Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. 1987. № 52.
  6. Clahsen H. The grammatical characterization of developmental dysphasia // Linguistics. 1989. № 27.
  7. Hill E.L. Non-specific nature of specific language impairment: a review of the literature with regard to concomitant motor impairments // J. Lang Commun Disord. 2001. № 36.
  8. Joanisse M., Seidenberg M. Specific language impairment: A deficit in language or processing? // Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 1998. № 2.
  9. Johnston J. Specific language disorders in the child // Handbook of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology (eds. N. Lass, L. McReynolds, J. Northern, D. Yoder). Toronto, 1988.
  10. Johnston J., Weismer S. Mental rotation abilities in language disordered children // Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 1983. № 26.
  11. Kail R. A method for studying the generalized slowing hypothesis in children with specific language impairment // Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 1994. № 37.
  12. Leonard L. Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge. 1998.
  13. Montgomery J. Sentence comprehension in children with specific language impairment: The role of phonological working memory // Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 1995. № 38.
  14. Powell R., Bishop D.V.M. Clumsiness and perceptual problems in children with specific language impairment. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. 1992. № 34.
  15. Rapin I., Allen D. Developmental dysphasia and autism in preschool children: Characteristics and subtypes // Proceedings of the first international symposium on specific speech and language disorders in children (eds. J. Martin, P. Fletcher, P. Grunwell, D. Hall. London, 1987.
  16. Rice M., Oetting J. Morphological deficits of SLI children: Evaluation of number marking and agreement // Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 1993. № 36.
  17. Schul R., Stiles J., Wulfeck B., Townsend J. How 'generalized' is the 'slowed processing' in SLI? The case of visuospa-tial attentional orienting. Neuropsychologia. 2004. № 42.
  18. Tallal P., Miller S., Fitch R. Neurobiological basis of speech: a case for the pre-eminence of temporal processing // Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1993. № 682.
  19. Tallal P., Stark R., Kallman C., Mellits D. A re-examination of some nonverbal perceptual abilities of language-impaired and normal children as a function of age and sensory modality // Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 1981. № 24.
  20. Ullman M., Gopnik E. The production of inflectional morphology in hereditary specific language impairment // Matthews J. (ed.) The McGill working papers in linguistics: Linguistic aspects of familial language impairment. Montreal, 1994.
  21. Va n der Lely H. Domain-specific cognitive systems: insight from Grammatical-SLI. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2005. № 9.
  22. Wilson B., Risucci D. A model for clinicalquantitative classification. Generation 1: Application to language-disordered pre-school children // Brain and Language. 1986. № 27.
  23. Wyke M., Asso D. Perception and memory for spatial relations in children with developmental dysphasia // Neuropsychologia. 1979. № 17.

Information About the Authors

Sergej Y. Kiselev, PhD in Psychology, Associate professor at the Clinical Psychology Department, Faculty of Psychology, Ural State University named after. A.M. Gorky, Ekaterinburg, Russia, e-mail:

Margarita Y. Permyakova, Applicant at the Clinical Psychology Department, Faculty of Psychology at the A.M. Gorky Ural State University, Ekaterinburg, Russia

Yuliya Y. Lapshina, Assistant at the Clinical Psychology Department, Faculty of Psychology at the A.M. Gorky Ural State University, Ekaterinburg, Russia



Total: 4880
Previous month: 20
Current month: 8


Total: 778
Previous month: 1
Current month: 0