The Role of Polyperspective Representations in Joint Attention Processes

The aim of our work was to test the hypothesis that one's identification of objects of attention in an observed individual depends on his/her understanding of the context of a communicative situation based on the comparison of the participants' points of view. In the first experimental study the subjects (N=74) carried out visual search for objects of attention of participants of non-verbal communication scenes with/without information on the communication context provided, and with short/prolonged display of information for assessing gaze direction of the participants. Understanding the context resulted in a higher efficiency of iden¬tification and saccadic detection of the participants' objects of attention in the subjects, regardless of their access to the information on gaze direction. In the second experiment the subjects (N=32), after watching videos of communication episodes, were asked to search for changes of different objects in the scenes. Those subjects who had a clear understanding of the context of communication first of all noticed the changes in the future objects of attention of the participants, in spite of the absence of any 'hints' like head or eye orientation. The outcomes of the research are discussed within the framework of concepts focusing on the significance of polyperspective representations for the understanding of communicative signals.

1. Bakhtin M.M. Antropolingvistika: Izbrannye trudy 1990. 682 p. [Anthropological linguistics: Selected works]. Moscow: Labirint, 2010. 255 p.
2. Bakhtin M.M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva / Sost. S.G. Bocharov; primech. S.S. Averintseva i S.G. Bocharova. M.: Iskusstvo, 1979. 424 s. [Bakhtin M.M. *The Aesthetics of Verbal Art* / Compiled by S.G. Bocharov; notes by S.S. Averintsev and S.G. Bocharov. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1979. 424 p.]
3. Iriskhanova O.K. Igry fokusa v yazyke. Semantika, sintaksis i pragmatika defokusirovaniya. M.: YAzyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2014. 320 s. [Irishkhanova O.K. Games of Focus in Language: Semantics, Syntax, and Pragmatics of Defocusing. Moscow: Languages ​​of Slavic Cultures, 2014. 320 pp.]
4. Linvisticheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' / Pod red. V.N. Yartsevoy; In-t yazykoznaniya AN SSSR. M.: Sov. entsikl., 1990. 682 s. [ Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary / Ed. by V.N. Yartseva; Institute of Linguistics, Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Moscow: Sovetskaya Entsiklopediya, 1990. 682 p.]
5. Paducheva Ye.V. Vyskazyvaniye i yego sootnesennost' s deystvitel'nost'yu (referentsial'nyye aspekty semantiki mestoimeniy). M.: Nauka, 1985. 272 s. [Paducheva E.V. The Utterance and Its Relation to Reality (Referential Aspects of Pronoun Semantics). Moscow: Nauka, 1985. 272 ​​p.]
6. Tomasello M. Istoki chelovecheskogo obshcheniya. M.: YAzyki slavyanskikh kul'tur, 2011. 328 s. [Tomasello M. Origins of Human Communication. Moscow: Languages ​​of Slavic Cultures, 2011. 328 p.]
7. Falikman M.V. Vnimaniye // Obshchaya psikhologiya: v 7 t. T.4 / Pod red. B.S. Bratusya. M.: Izdatel'skiy tsentr «Akademiya», 2006. 453 s. [ Falikman M.V. Attention // General Psychology: in 7 vols. Vol. 4 / Ed. by B.S. Bratus. Moscow: Academia Publishing Center, 2006. 453 p.]
8. Baron-Cohen S. Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995. 183 р.
9. Baron-Cohen S., Leslie A.M., Frith U. Does the autistic child have a 'theory of mind'? // Cognition. 1985. Vol. 21 (1). Р. 37—46.
10. Bock S.W., Dicke P., Thier P. How precise is gaze following in humans? // Vision research. 2008. Vol. 48. № 7. P. 946—957.
11. Butterworth G.E., Jarrett N. What minds have in common is space: Spatial mechanisms serving joint attention in infancy // British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 1991. Vol. 9. P. 55—72.
12. Crouzet S., Kirchner H., Thorpe S.J. Fast saccades toward faces: face detection in just 100 ms. // Journal of Vision. 2010. Vol. 10 (4). P. 1—17.
13. Emery N.J. The eyes have it: The neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze // Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2000. Vol. 24. Р. 581—604.
14. Fauconnier G., Turner M. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities. N. Y.: Basic Books, 2002. 441 р.
15. Friesen C.K., Kingstone A. The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze // Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 1998. Vol. 5. Р. 490—495.
16. Friesen C.K., Moore C., Kingstone A. Does gaze direction really trigger a reflexive shift of attention? // Brain and Cognition. 2005. Vol. 57 (1). Р. 66—69.
17. Frischen A., Bayliss A.P., Tipper S.P. Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences // Psychological Bulletin. 2007. Vol. 133. Р. 694—724.
18. Langton S., Watt R., Bruce V. Do the eyes have it? Cues to the direction of social attention // Trends in cognitive sciences. 2000. Vol. 4 (2). Р. 50—59.
19. Levin D.T., Simons D.J. Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures // Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 1997. Vol. 4 (4). P. 501—506.
20. Malcolm G.L., Henderson J.M. The effects of target template specificity on visual search in real-world scenes: Evidence from eye movements // Journal of Vision. 2009. Vol. 9 (11):8. Р. 1—13.
21. Moll H., Tomasello M. Co-operation and human cognition: The Vygotskian intelligence hypothesis // Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. 2007. Vol. 362. P. 639—648.
22. O'Regan J.K., Deubel H., Clark J.J., Rensink R.A. Picture changes during blinks: Looking without seeing and seeing without looking // Visual Cognition. 2000. Vol. 7. P. 191—212.
23. Parrill F. Interactions between discourse status and viewpoint in co-speech gesture // B. Dancygier & E. Sweetser (Eds.) Viewpoint in Language: A Multimodal Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. P. 97—112.
24. Rensink R.A., O'Regan J.K., Clark J.J. To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes // Psychological Science. 1997. Vol. 8 (5). P. 368—373.
25. Simons D.J., Levin D.T. Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction // Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 1998. Vol. 5 (4). P. 644—649.
26. Sweetser E. Introduction: viewpoint and perspective in language and gesture, from the Ground down // B. Dancygier & E. Sweetser (Eds.) Viewpoint in Language: A Multimodal Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. P. 1—24.
27. Todorovic D. Geometrical basis of perception of gaze direction // Vision research. 2006. Vol. 46 (21). P. 3549—3562.
28. Walther D., Koch Ch. Modeling attention to salient proto-objects // Neural Networks. 2006. Vol. 19. Р. 1395—1407.