Features of Moral Foundations in Mongol, German and Russian Adolescents

The difference in moral foundations between adults living in Western or Eastern countries is well-known, but there is lack of evidence about such difference in adolescence. We tested the hypothesis about cultural differences of moral foundations in Mongolian, Russian and German adolescents. As the methodology of the study we used Moral Foundations Theory describing five basic dimensions of moral domain including Harm/Care, Fair- ness/Reciprocity, Ingroup/Loyalty, Authority/Respect, and Purity/Sanctity. The sample comprised 446 Mon- golian, 450 Russian and 117 German adolescents at the age of 12…16 years old. We used three versions of Moral Foundations Questionnaire in different languages. The results of statistical analysis showed that general analy- sis, based on relations between scales, was acceptable. The replication of factor structure was low. It was revealed that Mongolian adolescents had most conservative moral foundations. Moral foundations of Russian adolescents from Altai Republic were quite close to Mongolian ones, while German adolescents showed much more «progressive» moral foundations which were typical for western societies.

1. Vygotskii L.S. Istoriya razvitiya vysshikh psikhicheskikh funktsii [Genesis of higher mental functions]. Sobra- nie sochinenii v 6 t. T. 3. Problemy razvitiya psikhiki [Collected Works: in 6 vol. Vol.3. Problems of development of the mind]. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1983, pp. 5—328.
2. de Vaal’ F. Istoki morali: V poiskah chelovecheskogo u primatov [The Bonobo and the Atheist in Search of Human- ism among the Primates]. Moscow: Al’pina non-fikshn, 2014. 376 p. (In Russ.).
3. Bespalov A.M., Nikitina I.V., Vlasov M.S., Prud- nikova M.M., Odonchimeg T., Nyamdorj B. Youth Value Orientation: A Field Study in Western Mongolia. Central Asian  Journal  of Basic  and  Applied  Research, 2014, no. 2, pp. 30—47.
4. Borg I., Groenen P.J., Mair P. Applied multidimen- sional scaling. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012. 122 p.
5. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988. 590 p.
6. Schnall S., Haidt J., Clore G.L., Jordan A.H. Disgust as Em- bodied Moral Judgment. Personality & social psychology bulletin, 2008.Vol.34,no.8,pp.1096—1109.doi:10.1177/0146167208317771.
7. Eisenberg N. Emotion, regulation, and moral devel- opment. Annual review of psychology, 2000. Vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 665—697. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.665
8. Gilligan C. In a different voice: Women’s conceptions of self and of morality. Harvard educational review, 1977. Vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 481—517. doi: 10.17763/haer.47.4.g6167429416hg5l0
9. Haidt J. The emotional dog and its rational tail: a so- cial intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological review, 2001. Vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 814—834. doi: 10.1037/0033- 295X.108.4.814
10. Hu L., Bentler P.M.  Cutoff  criteria  for  fit  indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria ver- sus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a mul- tidisciplinary journal, 1999. Vol. 6, no.1, pp. 1—55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
11. Hutcherson C.A., Gross J.J. The moral emotions: A social—functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt. Journal of personality and social psychology, 2011. Vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 719—737. doi: 10.1037/a0022408
12. Jaffee S., Hyde J.S. Gender differences in moral orienta- tion: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 2000. Vol. 126(5), pp. 703—726. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.703
13. Joeckel S., Bowman N.D., Dogruel L. The Influence of Adolescents’ Moral Salience on Actions and Entertainment Experience in Interactive. Journal of Children and Media, 2013. Vol. 7, pp. 480—506. doi: 10.1080/17482798.2013.781513
14. Kohlberg L. The philosophy of moral development: moral stages and the idea of justice. Essays on Moral Develop- ment, Vol. 1. Harper & Row, 1981. 441 p.
15. Graham J., Nosek B.A., Haidt J., Iyer R., Koleva S., Ditto P.H. Mapping the moral domain. Journal of personality and social psychology, 2011. Vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 366—385. doi: 10.1037/a0021847
16. Graham J., Haidt J., Koleva S., Motyl M., Iyer R., Wojcik S., Ditto P.H. Moral foundations theory: The pragmat- ic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in experimental social psychology, 2013. Vol. 47, pp. 55—130. doi: 10.1016/B978-0- 12-407236-7.00002-4
17. Koleva S.P., Graham J., Iyer R., Ditto P.H., Haidt J. Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially Pu- rity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 2012. Vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 184—194. doi:10.1016/j. jrp.2012.01.006
18. Turiel E. The development of social knowledge: Moral- ity and convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983. 252 p.