Testing Integration Hypotheses in Dagestan: The Meditative Role of Individual Social Capital

The results of meditational analysis role of outgroup social capital when testing the integration hypothesis are presented. We considered how acculturation strategies, individual social capital and subjective well-being of persons living in a multicultural environment are related. The sample included representatives of three ethnic groups, living in the Republic of Dagestan: Avars (N=105), Dargins (N=121), and Russians (N=100). We used a modified method of "resource generator" to study the individual social capital. Also we used a Russian version of Berry's method of assessing acculturation strategies and subjective well-being. The obtained empirical data were analyzed using structural equation modeling. We hypothesized that the choice of integration strategy does not only promote harmonious intergroup relationships, but also has positive effects on well-being on the individual level. Those who choose the integration strategy end up with stronger social capital that works as a protective factor against various negative life events, promoting the overall well-being. However, our hypothesis was supported with Russians only, with Avars and Dargins it was supported with some restrictions. The results of this study shed light onto the socio-psychological mechanisms of integration of ethnic groups in a multicultural region, where integration is closely linked with mutual help and support across the ethnic boundaries.

1. Alfimtsev V.N. O sushchnosti i problemakh monitoringa mezhnatsional’nogo mira v Rossii [About the nature and problems of monitoring of inter-ethnic peace in Russia]. Aktual’nye problemy rossiiskogo prava [Actual problems of Russian law], 2016, no. 1, pp. 42—49.
2. Gurieva S.D. Mezhetnicheskie otnosheniya: etnicheskii faktor v mezhgruppovykh otnosheniyakh [Interethnic relations: ethnic factor in intergroup relations]. Vestnik Severo-Vostochnogo federal’nogo universiteta im. M.K. Ammosova [Bulletin of North-Eastern Federal University. M.K. Ammosov], 2008. Vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 79—83.
3. Kireev K.S. Mezhetnicheskie konflikty v Rossii: istoki i resheniya [Ethnic conflicts in Russia: origins and solutions]. Vlast’ [Power], 2007, no. 10, pp. 84—88.
4. Lebedeva N.M., Tatarko A.N., Berry J.W. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskie osnovy mul’tikul’turalizma: proverka gipotez o mezhkul’turnom vzaimodeistvii v rossiiskom kontekste [Socio-psychological foundations of multiculturalism: the testing of hypotheses about cross-cultural interaction in the Russian context]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Psychological journal], 2016. Vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 92—104.
5. Matveeva S.Ya., Zdravomyslov A.G. Mezhnatsional’nye konflikty v Rossii [Ethnic conflicts in Russia]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social Sciences and modernity], 1996, no. 2, pp. 153—164.
6. Pokadrovyi razbor. Perestanovki vnesli disbalans vo vlasti Dagestana [Elektronnyi resurs] [Time-lapse analysis. The reshuffle has made the imbalance in the power of Dagestan]. Available at: https://lenta.ru/articles/2016/02/17/dagestan (Accessed: 13.02.17).
7. Respublika Dagestan. Fakty. Mediaproekt gil’dii mezhetnicheskoi zhurnalistiki [The Republic Of Dagestan. Fact] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Available at: http://nazaccent.ru/geo/dagestan (Accessed: 13.02.2017).
8. Strategii mezhkul’turnogo vzaimodeistviya migrantov i naseleniya Rossii [Strategies of intercultural interaction of migrants and the Russian population]. Lebedeva N.M., Tatarko A.N. (eds.). Moscow: RUDN, 2009. 420 p.
9. Khukhlaev O.E., Minazova V.M., Pavlova O.S., Zykov E.V. Sotsial’naya identichnost’ i etnonatsional’nye ustanovki studencheskoi molodezhi Chechni [Social identity and ethnic setup of student’s youth of Chechnya]. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo [Social psychology and society], 2015. Vol. 6, no 4, pp. 23—40. doi:10.17759/sps.2015060403
10. Etnicheskaya tolerantnost’ v polikul’turnykh regionakh Rossii [Ethnic tolerance in multicultural regions of Russia]. Lebedeva N.M., Tatarko A.N. (eds.). Moscow: RUDN, 2009. 296 p.
11. Berry J., Sabatier C. Acculturation, discrimination, and adaptation among second generation immigrant youth in Montreal and Paris. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2010. Vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 191—207. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2009.11.007
12. Berry J.W. Multicultural policy in Canada: A social psychological analysis. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 1984. Vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 353—370. doi: 10.1037/h0080859
13. Berry J.W. Research on multiculturalism in Canada. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2013. Vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 663—675. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.09.005
14. Coleman J. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge/London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1990. 1014 p.
15. Diener E., Emmons R.A., Larson R.J., Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1985. Vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 71—75. doi: 10.1207/ s15327752jpa4901_13
16. Lamarca G., Leal M., Leao A., Sheiham A., Vettore M. The different roles of neighborhood and individual social capital on oral health—related quality of life during pregnancy and postpartum: a multilevel analysis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 2014. Vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 139—150. doi: 10.1111/ cdoe.12062
17. Lebedeva N., Tatarko A., Berry J.W. Are intercultural contacts dangerous or profitable for person and society? Intercultural relations in Russia and Latvia. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 2016. Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 41—56. doi: 10.11621/pir.2016.0103
18. Lin N. Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 294 p.
19. Moghaddam F.M. Individualistic and collective integration strategies among immigrations: Toward a mobility model of cultural integration. In Berry J. (eds.), Ethnic psychology: Research and practice with immigrants, refugees, native peoples, ethnic groups and sojourners. Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger, 1988. P. 69—77.
20. Nguyen A., Benet-Martínez V. Biculturalism and Adjustment A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 2013. Vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 122—159. doi: 10.1177/0022022111435097
21. Putnam R. Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of democracy, 1995. Vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 65—78. doi: 10.1353/jod.1995.0002
22. Van Der Gaag M., Snijders T. Proposals for the measurement of individual social capital. In Flap H (eds.), Creation and returns of social capital. London: Routledge. 2004, pp. 199—218.
23. Van der Gaag M., Webber M. Measurement of Individual Social Capital: Questions, Instruments, and Measures. In Kawachi I. (eds.), Social Capital and Health. New York: Springer. 2008, pp. 29—49.
24. Verhaeghe P., Tampubolon G. Individual social capital, neighbourhood deprivation, and self-rated health in England. Social science and medicine, 2012. Vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 349—357. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.057.
25. Yang K. Individual social capital and its measurement in social surveys. Survey Research Methods, 2007. Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 19—27. doi: 10.18148/srm/2007.v1i1.48