Personality Development and the Quality of Solitude

The paper focuses on the associations between personality development and qualitative characteristics of experiences in solitude. The authors review recent studies of solitude and discuss the differences between solitude and loneliness. A mixed-methods empirical study of solitude experiences using an online sample (N=204) is presented. The respondents reported the quantity of time they typically spend in solitude and described their subjective experiences and typical activities during this time. They also completed Multidimensional Inventory of Loneliness Experience (MILE), Existence Scale (ES), and Washington University Sentence Completion Test (WUSCT). Ego development measured by WUSCT showed weak positive associations with positive solitude (MILE), self-transcendence (ES), the prevalence of positive emotions in solitude, and a higher variety of activities in solitude (particularly, meditation, creative activities, physical activity), based on content analysis. The findings indicate that individuals at advanced ego development stages are less likely to suffer from loneliness when alone, but to accept the situations of solitude, endorse them, and use them in creative ways. The findings explain the individual differences in the experiences associated with solitude and are discussed in the context of existential and cultural-historical approach.

1. Kostenko V.Yu., Leont’ev D.A. Vzglyad na sebya so storony: rol’ refleksii i samodeterminatsii v razvitii lichnosti [A look at oneself from the outside: the role of reflection and self-determination in the development of personality]. Mir psikhologii [World of psychology], 2016, no. 3, pp. 97—108.
2. Kochetkova T.N. Protivorechivaya sushchnost’ kontsepta «odinochestvo» [Contradictory essence of the concept of «loneliness»]. Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsial’nykh problem (elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal) [Modern studies of social problems (electronic scientific journal)], 2015, no. 9, pp. 534—542. doi: 10.12731/2218-7405-2015-9-41
3. Krivtsova S.V., Lengle A., Orgler K. Shkala ekzistentsii (Existenzskala) A. Lengle i K. Orgler [The scale of existence (Existenzskala) A. Längle and Ch. Orgler]. Ekzistentsial’nyi analiz: Byulleten’ [Existential Analysis: Bulletin], 2009, no. 1, pp. 141—170.
4. Kuchinskii G.M. Psikhologiya vnutrennego dialoga [Psychology of internal dialogue]. Minsk: Universitetskoe, 1988. 216 p.
5. Leont’ev D.A. Podkhod cherez razvitie Ego: urovnevaya teoriya Dzh. Levindzher [The approach through the development of the ego: the level theory of Jane Loevinger]. In Leont’ev D.A. (ed.), Lichnostnyi potentsial: struktura i diagnostika [Personality Potential: Structure and Assessment]. Moscow: Smysl, 2011, pp. 59—75.
6. Leont’ev D.A. Ekzistentsial’nyi smysl odinochestva [The existential meaning of loneliness]. Ekzistentsial’naya traditsiya: filosofiya, psikhologiya, psikhoterapiya [Existential tradition: philosophy, psychology, psychotherapy], 2011, no. 2, pp. 101—108.
7. Leont’ev D.A., Mikhailova N.A., Rasskazova E.I. Aprobatsiya metodiki nezakonchennykh predlozhenii Vashingtonskogo universiteta [Approbation of the technique of unfinished sentences of University of Washington]. Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika [Psychological diagnostics], 2010, no. 2, pp. 6—35.
8. Matsuta V.V. Obshchenie s samim soboi [Communicating with yourself]. Kommunikativnoe izmerenie v psikhologicheskoi antropologii [Communicative dimension in psychological anthropology]. Tomsk: Ivan Fedorov, 2007, pp. 109—123.
9. Mel’nik L.V. Perezhivanie chuvstva ekzistentsial’nogo odinochestva u yunoshei s vysokim urovnem kreativnosti [Experiencing feeling of existential loneliness in young men with a high level of creativity]. Izvestiya TulGU. Seriya: Psikhologiya [Izvestiya of Tula State University. Series: Psychology]. Tula, 2004, no. 4, pp. 330—335.
10. Nartova-Bochaver S.K. Psikhologiya privatnosti [Psychology of privacy]. Differentsial’naya psikhologiya: khrestomatiya [Differential psychology: chrestomathy]. Moscow: Alvian, 2008, pp. 93—109.
11. Neumoeva E.V. Odinochestvo kak psikhicheskii fenomen i resurs razvitiya lichnosti v yunosheskom vozraste: Avtoref. diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. [Loneliness as a psychic phenomenon and resource development of personality in adolescence. Ph.D. (Psychology) Thesis]. Samara, 2005. 24 p.
12. Osin E.N., Leont’ev D.A. Differentsial’nyi oprosnik perezhivaniya odinochestva: struktura i svoistva [Differential questionnaire of experiencing of loneliness: the structure and properties]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki [Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics], 2013. Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 55—81.
13. Polyakova I.P., Batrakova T.S., Kopytina M.Yu. Vliyanie odinochestva na vnutrennii mir lichnosti i ee povsednevnuyu zhizn’ [The influence of loneliness on the inner world of the individual and her daily life]. Vestnik Vyatskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Russian State Humanitarian University], 2009, no. 4, pp. 35—40.
14. Slobodchikov I.M. Sovremennye issledovaniya perezhivaniya odinochestva [Modern studies of the experience of loneliness]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education], 2007, no. 3, pp. 27—35.
15. Slobodchikov I.M. Perezhivanie odinochestva s pozitsii kul’turno-istoricheskoi psikhologii L.S. Vygotskogo [The experience of loneliness from the perspective of cultural-historical psychology of L.S. Vygotsky]. Vestnik Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Russian State Humanitarian University], 2008, no. 3, pp. 32—42.
16. Bauer J.J. The postconventional Self: Ego Maturity, Growth Stories … and Happiness. The Postconventional personality: assessing, researching, and theorizing higher development. New York: SUNY Press, 2011, pp. 101—117.
17. Blumentritt T.L. Is Higher Better? A Review and Analysis of the Correlates of Postconventional Ego Development. The Postconventional personality: assessing, researching, and theorizing higher development. New York: SUNY Press, 2011, pp. 153—162.
18. Burger J.M. Individual differences in preference for solitude. Journal of Research in Personality, 1995. Vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 85—108. doi: 10.1006/jrpe.1995.1005
19. Chua S.N., Koestner R. A self-determination theory perspective on the role of autonomy in solitary behavior. The Journal of social psychology, 2008. Vol. 148 no. 5, pp. 645—648. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.148.5.645—648
20. Coplan R.J., Bowker J.C. All Alone Multiple Perspectives on the Study of Solitude. The Handbook of Solitude. Psychological Perspectives on Social Isolation, Social Withdrawal, and Being Alone. Chichester, United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2014, pp. 3—14. doi: 10.1002/9781118427378.ch1
21. Cresswell J.W., Clark V.L.P. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2011. 457 p.
22. Detrixhe J.J., Samstag L.W., Penn L.S., Wong P.S. A Lonely Idea: Solitude’s Separation from Psychological Research and Theory. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 2014. Vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 310—331. doi: 10.1080/00107530.2014.897853
23. Gignac G.E., Szodorai E.T. Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 2016. Vol. 102, pp. 74—78. doi: 10.1016/j. paid.2016.06.069
24. Gilmore M.J., Durkin K. A Critical Review of the Validity of Ego Development Theory and Its Measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 2001. Vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 541— 567. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7703_12
25. Holt R.R. Loevinger’s measure of ego development: Reliability and national norms for male and female short forms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980. Vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 909—920.
26. Hsieh H.F., Shannon S.E. Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 2005. Vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1277—1288. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687
27. Hy L.X., Loevinger J. Measuring Ego Development. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996. 295 p.
28. Long C.R., Averill J.R. Solitude: An exploration of benefits of being alone. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 2003. Vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 21—44. doi: 10.1111/1468—5914.00204
29. Long C.R., Seburn M., Averill J.R., More T.A. Solitude experiences: Varieties, settings, and individual differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2003. Vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 578—583. doi: 10.1177/0146167203029005003
30. Moustakas C.E. Loneliness and love. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1972. 146 p.
31. Nguyen T.T., Ryan M.R., Deci E.L. The Capacity to Be Alone [Elektronnyi resurs]. Poster presented at the 16th Annual Meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology (Long Beach, CA, February 2015). URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277557969_The_Capacity_to_be_Alone (Accessed: 13.12.2016).
32. Nguyen T.T., Ryan M.R., Deci E.L. How Time Alone Predicts Daily Well-Being: The Self-Determination Perspectives [Elektronnyi resurs]. Poster presented at the 27th Annual Convention of the Association for Psychological Science (New York, May 2015). URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277557810_How_Time_Alone_Predicts_Daily_Well-Being_The_Self-Determination_Perspectives (Accessed: 13.12.2016).
33. The Handbook of Solitude. Psychological Perspectives on Social Isolation, Social Withdrawal, and Being Alone. Chichester, United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2014. 608 p. doi: 10.1002/9781118427378
34. Tillich P. The Eternal Now. New York: Paul Scribner’s Sons, 1963. 103 p.