Incubation and Activation of the Semantic Network

The issue of incubation is a central and paradoxical topic in the psychology of thinking and creativity. The paradox arises from the observation that problem-solving can advance during periods when the solver is not consciously focused on the problem but is instead engaged in unrelated activities. Despite extensive research on incubation, a unified explanation for this phenomenon remains elusive. This article introduces a new theoretical approach characterized by two distinctive features. First, it advocates for the examination of the general problem of incubation through tasks that facilitate a precise analysis of the underlying processes—specifically, Mednick's triads. Second, to enable a comprehensive analysis of problem-solving processes, this approach incorporates methods from general network theory. Consequently, the theoretical model developed to elucidate incubation encompasses two levels of processes: the propagation of activation across the semantic network and the control processes driven by goal-setting when the individual accepts the problem.

1. Byuler V. Gauss. Biograficheskoe issledovanie [Gauss. A Biographical Study]. Moscow: Nauka, 1989. (In Russ.).
2. Valueva E.A. Rol inkubatsionnogo perioda v reshenii zadach [The Role of Incubation Period in Problem Solving]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki [Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics], 2016. Vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 789–800. DOI:10.17323/1813-8918-2016-4-789-800. (In Russ.).
3. Lapteva N.M. Inkubatsiya v reshenii tvorcheskikh zadach: gipotezy i perspektivy [Incubation in Solving Creative Problems: Hypotheses and Prospects]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki [Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics], 2020. Vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 630–644. DOI:10.17323/1813-8918-2020-4-630-644. (In Russ.).
4. Lapteva N.M. Kognitivnye mekhanizmy inkubatsii pri reshenii myslitelnykh zadach [Cognitive Mechanisms of Incubation in Solving Thinking Problems]. Candidate's thesis. Moscow, 2021. 122 p. (In Russ.).
5. Ponomarev Ya.A. Psikhika i intuitsiya [Psychics and Intuition]. Moscow: Politizdat, 1967. (In Russ.).
6. Puankare A. Matematicheskoe otkrytie [Mathematical Discovery]. Khrestomatiya po obshchei psikhologii. Psikhologiya myshleniya [Reader on General Psychology. Psychology of Thinking]. Moscow: MGU Publishing House, 1981, pp. 356–365. (In Russ.).
7. Ushakov D.V. Tvorchestvo i «darvinovskii» sposob ego opisaniya [Creativity and the “Darwinian” Way of Its Description]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Psychological Journal], 2000. Vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 103–110. (In Russ.).
8. Ushakov D.V. Na puti k tselochnomu videniyu cheloveka [Towards a Holistic Vision of a Human]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki [Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics], 2020. Vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 617–629. (In Russ.).
9. Falikman M.V., Koifman A.Ya. Vidy praiminga v issledovaniyakh vospriyatiya i pertseptivnogo vnimaniya [Types of Priming in Studies of Perception and Perceptual Attention]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta [Moscow University Bulletin], 2005. Vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 86–97. (In Russ.).
10. Baird B., Smallwood J., Mrazek M.D., Kam J.W.Y., Franklin M.S., Schooler J.W. Inspired by distraction: Mind wandering facilitates creative incubation. Psychol. Sci., 2012. Vol. 23, pp. 1117–1122. DOI:10.1177/0956797612446024
11. Bourgin D. D., Abbot J.T., Griffiths T.L. Empirical Evidence for Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Memory Search. Proceeding of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 2014. Vol. 36, pp. 224.
12. Collins A.M., Loftus E.F. A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 1975. Vol. 82, pp. 407–428. DOI:10.1037//0033-295X.82.6.407
13. Cramer A.O., Waldorp L.J., Van Der Maas H.L., Borsboom D. Comorbidity: a network perspective. Behav. Brain Sci, 2010. Vol. 33, pp. 137–150. DOI:10.1017/S0140525X09991567
14. Dalege J., Borsboom D., van Harreveld F., van den Berg H., Conner M., Maas H. Toward a formalized account of attitudes: the causal attitude network (CAN) model. Psychol. Rev, 2016. Vol. 123, pp. 2 - 22. DOI:10.1037/a0039802
15. De Deyne S., Navarro D.J., Perfors A., Brysbaert M., Storms G. The “Small World of Words” English word association norms for over 12,000 cue words. Behavior Research Methods, 2019. Vol. 51, pp. 987–1006. DOI:10.3758/s13428-018-1115-7
16. Dijksterhuis A., Meurs T. Where creativity resides: the generative power of unconscious thought. Consciousness and Cognition, 2006. Vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 135–146. DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2005.04.007
17. Dijksterhuis A., Nordgren L.F.A. Theory of Unconscious Thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2006. Vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 95–109. DOI:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00007.x
18. Dodds R.A., Smith S.M., Ward T.B. The use of environmental clues during incubation // Creativity Research Journal, 2002. Vol. 14, no. 3–4, pp. 287–304. DOI:10.1207/S15326934CRJ1434_1
19. Dorfman J. Metacognition and incubation effects in insight problem solving. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. San Diego: University of California, 1990.
20. Dorfman J., Shames V.A., Kilhstrom J.F. Intuition, incubation, and insight: Implicit cognition in problem solving. In Underwood G. (eds.) Implicit cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996, pp. 257-296. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198523109.003.0007
21. Estrada E., Rodríguez-Velázquez J.A. Complex Networks as Hypergraphs, 2005.
22. Gilhooly K.J. Incubation and Intuition in Creative Problem Solving. Front. Psychol, 2016. Vol. 7, pp. 1807. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01076
23. Gilhooly K.J., Georgiou G.J., Garrison J., Reston J.D., Sirota M. Don’t wait to incubate: Immediate versus delayed incubation in divergent thinking. Memory and Cognition, 2012. Vol. 40, pp. 966–975. DOI:10.3758/s13421-012-0199-z
24. Gilhooly K.J., Georgiou G.J., Sirota M., Paphiti-Galeano A. Incubation and suppression processes in creative problem solving. Thinking and Reasoning, 2015. Vol. 21, pp. 130–146. DOI:10.1080/13546783.2014.953581
25. Helie S., Sun R. Incubation, insight, and creative problem solving: a unified theory and a connectionist model. Psychol. Rev., 2010. Vol. 117, pp. 994–1024. DOI:10.1037/a0019532
26. Kajic I., Gosmann J., Stewart T. C., Wennekers T., Eliasmith Ch., A Spiking Neuron Model of Word Associations for the Remote Associates Test. Frontiers in Psychology, 2017. Vol. 8, no. 99. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00099
27. Kenett Y.N., Anaki D., Faust M. Investigating the structure of semantic networks in low and high creative persons. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2014. Vol. 8, no. 407, pp. 1–16. DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00407
28. Kenett Y.N. Flexibility of thought in high creative individuals represented by percolation analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 2018. Vol. 115, no. 5, pp. 867-872. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1717362115
29. Kohn N., Smith S. M. Partly versus completely out of your mind: Effects of incubation and distraction on resolving fixation. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 2009. Vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 102–118. DOI:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01309.x
30. Martindale C. Creativity and connectionism. In Smith S. M., Ward T. B., Finke R. A. (eds.) The creative cognition approach. Cambridge, MA: Bradford, 1995, pp. 249–268. DOI:10.7551/mitpress/2205.003.0015
31. Mednick M., Mednick S., Mednick E. Incubation of creative performance and specific associative priming. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964. Vol. 69, pp. 84–88. DOI:10.1037/H0045994
32. Mednick. S. The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 1962. Vol. 69, pp. 220-232. DOI:10.1037/h0048850
33. Milgram S. The small world problem. Psychol. Today, 1967. Vol. 2, pp. 60–67.
34. Newman M.E., Clauset A. Structure and inference in annotated networks. Nat. Commun., 2016. Vol. 7, pp. 1–11. DOI:10.1038/ncomms11863
35. Newman M.E.J., Barabási A.L.E., Watts D.J. The Structure and Dynamics of Networks. Princeton University Press, 2006.
36. Olteteanu A.M., Falomir Z. ComRAT-C: A Computational Compound Remote Associates Test Solver based on Language Data and its Comparison to Human Performance. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2015. Vol. 67, pp. 81-90. DOI:10.1016/j.patrec.2015.05.015
37. Olteteanu A.M., Schultheis H., What determines creative association? Revealing two factors which separately influence the creative process when solving the remote associates test. Journal of Creative Behavior, 2017. Vol. 53, pp. 389. DOI:10.1002/jocb.177
38. Penaloza A.A., Calvillo D.P. Incubation provides relief from artificial fixation in problem solving. Creativity Research Journal, 2012. Vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 338–344. DOI:10.1080/10400419.2012.730329
39. Ramón y Cajal S. The Croonian Lecture: La Fine Structure des Centres Nerveux. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 1894. Vol. 55, pp. 444–468. DOI:10.1098/rspl.1894.0063
40. Richens R.H. Preprogramming for mechanical translation. Mech. Transl. Comput. Ling., 1956. Vol. 3, pp. 20–25.
41. Sadler-Smith E. Wallas‘ Four-Stage Model of the Creative Process: More Than Meets the Eye? Creativity Research Journal, 2015. Vol. 27, no. 4. pp. 342–352. DOI:10.1080/10400419.2015.1087277
42. Savi A.O., Marsman M., van der Maas H.L., Maris G. K. The wiring of intelligence. Perspect. Psychol. Sci., 2019. Vol. 14, pp. 1034–1061. DOI:10.1177/1745691619866447
43. Scheerer M. Problem solving. Scientific American, 1963. Vol. 208, no. 4. pp. 118–128. DOI:10.1038/2151119b0
44. Segal E. Incubation in insight problem solving. Creativity Research Journal, 2004. Vol. 16, pp. 141–148. DOI:10.1207/s15326934crj1601_13
45. Seifert C.M., Meyer D.E., Davidson N., Patalano A.L., Yaniv I. Demystification of cognitive insight: Opportunistic assimilation and the prepared-mind hypothesis. In Sternberg R.J., Davidson J.E. (eds.) The nature of insight. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1995, pp. 65–124.
46. Sio U.N., Ormerod T.C. Does incubation enhance problem solving? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 2009. Vol. 135, no. 1, pp. 94–120. DOI:10.1037/a0014212
47. Sio U.N., Rudowicz E. The role of an incubation period in creative problem solving. Creativity Research Journal, 2007. Vol. 19, no. 2-3. pp. 307–318. DOI:10.1080/10400410701397453
48. Smith K.A., Huber D.E., Vul E., Multiply-constrained semantic search in the Remote Associates Test. Cognition, 2013, Vol. 128, no. 64. DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.03.001
49. Smith S.M. Incubation. Encyclopedia of Creativity. Second Edition, 2011. Vol. 1, pp. 653–657. DOI:10.1787/9789264173781-en
50. Smith S.M., Blankenship S.E. Incubation and the persistence of fixation in problem solving. American Journal of Psychology, 1991. Vol. 104, no. 1. pp. 61–87. DOI:10.2307/1422851
51. Smith S.M., Blankenship S.E. Incubation effects. Bulletin of the Psychonomic society, 1989. Vol. 27, pp. 311–314. DOI:10.3758/BF03334612
52. Stella M. Modelling Early Word Acquisition through Multiplex Lexical Networks and Machine Learning. Big Data Cogn. Comput., 2019. Vol. 3, no. 10. DOI:10.3390/bdcc3010010
53. Stella M., Beckage N.M., Brede M., De Domenico M. Multiplex model of mental lexicon reveals explosive learning in humans. Scientific Reports, 2018. Vol. 8, no. 1, Article ID 2259. DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-20730-5
54. Sternberg R.J., Davidson J.E. The nature of insight. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press, 1995. 617 p.
55. Strick M., Dijksterhuis A., Bos M.W., Sjoerdsma A., VanBaaren R.B., Nordgren L.F. A meta-analysis on unconscious thought effects. Soc. Cogn., 2011. Vol. 29, pp. 738–762. DOI:10.1521/SOCO.2011.29.6.738
56. Strogatz S.H. Exploring complex networks. Nature, 2001. Vol. 410, pp. 268–276. DOI:10.1038/35065725
57. Thagard P. Mind: introduction to cognitive science, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 2005.
58. Valueva E. A., Lapteva N. M. Do we need to forget fixations to incubate? Fixation forgetting theory paradox. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2020. Vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 682–695. DOI: 10.17323/1813-8918-2020-4-682-695
59. Van Der Maas H.L. et al. A dynamical model of general intelligence: the positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. Psychol. Rev., 2006. Vol. 113, pp. 842–861. DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.842
60. Van Der Maas H.L., Kan K.J., Marsman M., Stevenson C.E. Network models for cognitive development and intelligence. J. Intell., 2017. Vol. 5, no. 2. DOI:10.3390/jintelligence5020016
61. Vul E., Pashler H. Incubation benefits only after people have been misdirected. Memory & Cognition, 2007. Vol. 35, no. 4. pp. 701–710. DOI:10.3758/BF03193308
62. Wallas G. The art of thought. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1926. pp. 31–39.
63. Watts D. J., Strogatz S.H. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 1998. Vol. 393, pp. 440–442. DOI:10.1038/30918
64. Weisberg R.W. Creativity: Understanding Innovation in Problem Solving, Science, Invention, and the Arts. New York, NY: J. Wiley & Sons, 2006. pp. 443–445.
65. Wertheimer M. Productive thinking. New York, NY: Harper & Row, 1959. 302 р.
66. Zhong C.B., Dijksterhuis A., Galinsky A.D. The merits of unconscious thought in creativity. Psychological science, 2008. Vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 912–918. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02176.x