Psychological Help for Family after Suicide

Relevance. After suiced family go through a psychological crisis, relatives are at risk of developing symptoms of emotional distress. At the same time, stigmatization can interfere seeking informal help, which makes it important to provide psychological help to this group of clients. Purpose of the study. Examine various approaches to providing psychological help to relatives of suicides and highlight the targets of such interventions. Materials and methods. The article presents a literature review of foreign studies of the effectiveness of various formats of psychological help for the family of a suicide. Results. There are different forms of psychological help for relatives of suicides: individual, group and family psychotherapy. After a suicide attempt, more research are focus on family therapy, and after a completed suicide on group psychotherapy for relatives of a suicide. For family therapy of suicidal behavior, two approaches are the most developt – cognitive–behavioral and attachment–based psychotherapy. The goals of working with the family are to reduce conflict and criticism, increase cohesion, develop communication skills and stabilization of the emotional state of family members. Inclusion of the family in the therapy of patient after suicide attempt increases the effectiveness of treatment. Support groups have become the most popular format for helping relatives after a completed suicide. Among the goals of working with the grieving are opportunity to share difficult feelings, return control over life, reconstruction of the meaning of what happened, and stoping ruminations. Research shows the effectiveness of these interventions for coping with grief, reducing emotional lability and improving social adaptation. Conclusions. Relatives of suicidal people need opportune psychological help. The most common approach for psychological help is cognitive–behavioral psychotherapy, which has programs with proven effectiveness for both relatives after a suicide attempt and after a completed suicide.

1. Ambrumova A.G., Postovalova L.I. Semeinaya diagnostika i voprosy profilaktiki suitsidal’nogo povedeniya [Family diagnostics and prevention of suicidal behavior]. In A.G. Ambrumova (ed.). Problemy profilaktiki i reabilitatsii v suitsidologii [Problems of prevention and rehabilitation of suicidology]. Moscow: Publ. NII psikhiatrii MZ RSFSR, 1984, pp. 62—77.
2. Bannikov G.S., Vikhristyuk O.V., Gayazova L.A. Psikhoterapiya suitsidal'nogo krizisnogo sostoyaniya u nesovershennoletnikh: analiz sovremennykh podkhodov i metodov [Modern psychological approaches to the therapy of suicidal crisis in children and teens]. Sotsial'naya i klinicheskaya psikhiatriya [Social and clinical psychiatry]. Vol. 31 (2), pp. 89¾93. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
3. Lyubov E.B. Kliniko–sotsial'noe bremya blizkikh zhertvy suitsida: esli by [Clinical and social burden for suicide survivors: if i had dealt with it properly]. Suitsidologiya [Suicidology]. Vol. 8 Is. 4(29), pp. 56¾75. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
4. Starshenbaum G.V. Suitsidologiya i krizisnaya psikhoterapiya [Suicidology and crisis psychotherapy]. Moscow .: Publ. «Kogito–Tsentr», 2005.  376 p. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
5. Kholmogorova A.B. Suitsidal'noe povedenie: teoreticheskaya model' i praktika pomoshchi v kognitivno–bikhevioral'noi terapii [Suicidal Behavior: Theoretical Model And Practical Implications In Cognitive–Behavioral Therapy]. Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy]. 2016. 24 (3), pp. 144¾163. DOI: 10.17759/cpp.2016240309 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
6. A randomized controlled trial: attachment–based family and nondirective supportive treatments for youth who are suicidal / Diamond G. et al. // J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019. Vol. 58 (7), pp. 721¾731.
7. Adolescent Suicide Attempt Prevention: Predictors of Response to a Cognitive–Behavioral Family & Youth Centered Intervention / Babeva N. et al. // Suicide Life Threat Behav.. 2020. Vol. 50(1), pp. 56¾71.
8. Aguirre T.P., Slater H.  Suicide Postvention as suicide prevention: improvement and expansion in the united states. Death Studies. 2010. Vol. 34, pp. 529¾540.
9. Attachment–based Family Therapy for Adolescents with Suicidal Ideation: A Randomized Controlled Trial / Diamond G. et al. // Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2010. Vol. 49(2). pp. 122¾131 DOI: 10.1097/00004583–201002000–00006
10. Campbell F.R. The Influence of an Active Postvention on the Length of Time Elapsed Before Survivors of Suicide Seek Treatment. Diss.... Doctor of Philosophy. LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 397 p. DOI: 10.31390/gradschool_disstheses.397
11. Cerel J., Campbell F. R. Suicide survivors seeking mental health services: a preliminary examination of the role of an active postvention model. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2008. Vol. 38(1), pp. 30¾ DOI: 10.1521/suli.2008.38.1.30
12. Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Suicide Prevention (CBT–SP): Treatment Model, Feasibility and Acceptability / Stanley et al. // Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009. Vol. 48 (10), pp. 1005¾1013. DOI: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e3181b5dbfe
13. Cognitive Behavior Therapy Manual for TADS / Curry J. F. et al.: manual.Duke University Medical Center, 2000. 271 p.
14. Émilie E.A. Critical, Relational Approach for Working with Suicide in Family Therapy. Special Issue: Integrative Practice in Family Therapy. Vol. 43, Is.1, pp. 104¾117.
15. EwingS.K. , Diamond G., Levy S. Attachment–based family therapy for depressed and suicidal adolescents: theory, clinical model and empirical support. Attach Hum Dev. 2015. Vol. 17 (2). pp. 136¾156.DOI: 10.1080/14616734.2015.1006384
16. Family connections: a program for relatives of persons with borderline personality disorder/ HoffmanD. // Fam. Process.  2005 Vol. 44 (2), pp. 217¾225. DOI: 10.1111/j.1545–5300.2005.00055.x
17. Magne–Ingvar U., Öjehagen A. Significant others of suicide attempters: their views at the time of the acute psychiatric consultation. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 1999. Vol. 34, pp. 73¾
18. MiklowitzJ,  Taylor D.O. Family–focused treatment of the suicidal bipolar patient.  Bipolar Disord. 2006. Vol. 8 (5 Pt. 2), pp. 640¾651.  DOI: 10.1111/j.13995618.2006.00320.x
19. Miller A.L., Rathus J.H., Linehan M.M. Dialectical Behavior Therapy with Suicidal Adolescents. New York / London. Publ: The Guilford Press. 2006. 346 p.
20. Review of family–based treatments from 2010 to 2019 for suicidal ideation and behavior / Frey L.M. et al. // Marital Fam. Ther. 2022. Vol. 48(1), pp. 154¾177.DOI: 10.1111/jmft.12568
21. Suicide bereavement in the UK: Descriptive findings from a national survey / McDonnell S. et al. // Suicide Life Threat. Beha 2022. Vol. 52 (5), pp. 887¾897.
22. Suicide postvention service models and guidelines 2014–2019: A systematic review / Andriessen K. et al. [Electronic resource]. Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 10. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02677/full (Accessed: 27.04.2023).
23. Supiano K.P., Haynes L.B., Pond V. The transformation of the meaning of death in complicated grief group therapy for survivors of suicide: A treatment process analysis using the meaning of loss codebook. Death Stud. Vol. 41 (9), pp. 553¾561. DOI: 10.1080/07481187.2017.1320339
24. Support received after bereavement by suicide and other sudden deaths: a cross–sectional UK study of 3432 young bereaved adults [Electronic resource] / Pitman A. L. et al. // BMJ Open. Vol. 7 (5). DOI:10.1136/bmjopen–2016–014487 Available at: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/7/5/e014487 (Accessed: 27.04.2023).
25. The use of narrative data to inform the psychotherapeutic group process with suicide survivors / Mitchell A.N. et al. // Issues Ment. Health Nurs. 2003. Vol. 24 (1), pp. 91¾106. DOI: 1080/01612840305308
26. Wagner , Hofmann L., Maaß U. Online–group intervention after suicide bereavement through the use of webinars: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial [Electronic resource]. Trials. 2020. Vol. 21 (1). DOI: 10.1186/s13063–019–3891–5. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31915044/ (Accessed: 27.04.2023).
27. Why We Need to Enhance Suicide Postvention/ ErlichD. et al. // J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 2017. Vol. 205 (7), pp. 507¾511. DOI: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000682