Loneliness and Sociotropy: the Moderation Effect of Age, Gender and Psychological Well-Being

Rationale. Loneliness is one of the most common conditions associated with negative consequences for the mental and physical health of a person. The work presents the study of the association between the experience of loneliness and sociotropy, as well as their moderators, such as age, gender, components of psychological well-being. Study Objective. We hypothesized that sociotropy could be a predictor of loneliness, but the power of the effect would be moderated by age-sex characteristics and levels of psychological well-being components. Materials and methods. The study involved 252 adults aged 19-73 years, 59% women. The following methods were used: the Differential Questionnaire for the Experience of Loneliness (K.N. Osin, D.A. Leontiev), the Sociotropy-Self-Sufficiency Questionnaire (O.Yu. Strizhitskaya et al.), the Scale of Psychological Well-Being C. Riff (adapted by L.V. Zhukovskaya, E.G. Troshikhina). Mathematical processing was performed on the basis of IBM SPSS 20.0 software using the PROCESS package (Hayes, 2018). Results. The results of the study confirmed the relationship between sociotropy and loneliness, and also revealed that age, autonomy, environmental mastery and personal growth act as moderators of the strength of this relationship. It was shown that in the older age group, as well as with high indicators of the components of psychological well-being, the strength of the connection between sociotropy and loneliness weakens and loses statistical significance. Conclusion. It can be concluded that the components of psychological well-being act as a resource that reduces one's vulnerability to the negative effects of loneliness.

1. ZHukovskaya L.V., Troshihina E.G. SHkala psihologicheskogo blagopoluchiya K. Riff [Scale of Psychological well-being by C. Ryff]. Psihologicheskij zhurnal, 2011, vol. 32, № 2, pp. 82–93.
2. Kryukova Т. Coping with loneliness psychology. Psychological Studies, 2016, № 9 (49), pp. 1–13. DOI: 10.54359/ps.v9i49.426
3. Osin E.N., Leont'ev D.A. Differencial'nyj oprosnik perezhivaniya odinochestva: struktura i svojstva [Differential questionnaire of loneliness: structure and characteristics]. Psihologiya. ZHurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki=Psychology. Journal of the High School of Economics, 2013, vol. 10, № 1, pp. 55–81.
4. Strizhitskaya O.Y., Petrash M.D., Murtazina I.R., Vartanyan G.A. Adaptation of “Sociotropy—Self-Sufficience” Questionnaire for Russian Sample on Middle Adults and Ageing People. Eksperimental'naâ psihologiâ = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2021, vol. 14, № 3, pp. 217–233. DOI: 10.17759/exppsy.2021140315. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
5. Akgün B.M., Hiçdurmaz D., Öz F. The investigation of learned resourcefulness in terms of locus of control, sociotropy-autonomy personality traits, and demographic and professional variables in nurses. Journal of Psychiatric Nursing / Psikiyatri Hemsireleri Dernegi, 2019, vol. 10, № 3, pp. 155–164. DOI: 10.14744/phd.2019.21549
6. Cacioppo J.T., Cacioppo S., Boomsma D.I. Evolutionary mechanisms for loneliness. Cognition & Emotion, 2014, vol. 28 (1), pp. 3–21. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2013.837379
7. Carstensen L.L., Fung H.H., Charles S.T. Socioemotional Selectivity Theory and the Regulation of Emotion in the Second Half of Life. Motivation & Emotion, 2003, vol. 27, № 2, pp. 103–123. DOI: 10.1023/A:1024569803230
8. Connor-Smith J., Compas B.E. Vulnerability to Social Stress: Coping as a Mediator or Moderator of Sociotropy and Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2002, vol. 26, № 1, pp. 39–55. DOI:10.1023/A:1013889504101
9. Craven J.M. Sociography and Autonomy in Older Adults and the Relationships between the Personality Styles, Social Support, and Affect. A thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Psychology at Massey University. Palmerston North: Massey University, 2007. 232 p.
10. Dasch K.B., Cohen L.H., Sahl J.C., Gunthert K.C. Moderating Effects of Sociotropy and Autonomy on Affective and Self-esteem Reactivity to Daily Stressors. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2008, vol. 32, № 2, pp. 177–195. DOI: 10.1007/s10608-007-9126-1
11. Hawkley L.C.; Cacioppo J.T. Loneliness matters: A theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2010, vol. 40, pp. 218–227. DOI: 10.1007/s12160-010-9210-8
12. Hayes A. F. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Methodology in the Social Sciences) (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press, 2018. 692 p.
13. Luo Y., Hawkley L.C., Waite L.J., Cacioppo J.T. Loneliness, health, and mortality in old age: A national longitudinal study. Social Science & Medicine, 2012, vol. 74, pp. 907–914. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.028
14. Marfoli A., Viglia F., Di Consiglio M., Merola S., Sdoia S., Couyoumdjian A. Anaclitic-sociotropic and introjective-autonomic personality dimensions and depressive symptoms: a systematic review. Annals of General Psychiatry, 2021, vol. 20, № 1, pp. 1–30. DOI: 10.1186/s12991-021-00373-z
15. Otani K., Suzuki A., Matsumoto Y., Shirata T. Marked differences in core beliefs about self and others, between sociotropy and autonomy: personality vulnerabilities in the cognitive model of depression. Neuropsychiatric Disease & Treatment, 2018, vol. 14, pp. 863–866. DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S161541
16. Sato T. Sociotropy and Autonomy: The Nature of Vulnerability. Journal of Psychology, 2003, vol. 137, № 5, pp. 447–466. DOI: 10.1080/00223980309600627
17. Stickley A., Koyanagi A., Roberts B., Richardson E., Abbott P., Tumanov S., McKee M. Loneliness: Its Correlates and Association with Health Behaviours and Outcomes in Nine Countries of the Former Soviet Union. PLoS ONE, 2013, vol. 8, № 7. e67978. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067978
18. Yang K., Girgus J.S. Are Women More Likely than Men Are to Care Excessively about Maintaining Positive Social Relationships? A Meta-Analytic Review of the Gender Difference in Sociotropy. Sex Roles, 2019, vol. 81, № 3 (4), pp. 157–172. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-018-0980-y