Emotional hint and effective problem solving

1899

Abstract

The phenomenon of emotional hint is introduced as a brief emotional cue presented during problem solving which resembles insight aha-experience. The results of experiment showed that emotional hint increased the probability of correct anagram solving. Three alternative hypotheses are proposed to explain underlying mechanisms – emotion as information hypothesis, activation hypothesis and shifting to intuitive mode of thinking hypothesis, and their possible experimental verification designs are discussed.

General Information

Keywords: emotional hint, problem solving, anagrams, activation

Journal rubric: Cognitive Psychology

Article type: scientific article

For citation: Valueva E.A., Mosinyan A.E., Lapteva E.M. Emotional hint and effective problem solving . Eksperimental'naâ psihologiâ = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2013. Vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 5–15. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Valueva E. A., Lapteva E. M. Fenomen podskazki pri reshenii zadach: vzgljad so storony psihologii tvorchestva. Chast' 2. Effekty podskazki v reshenii slozhnyh kognitivnyh zadach // Psihologija. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki. 2012. T. 9. № 3. S. 140–162.
  2. Valueva E. A., Lapteva E. M. Emocional'naja podskazka v reshenii zadach i kreativnost' // Kognitivnaja nauka v Moskve: Novye issledovanija. Tezisy konferencii (16 ijunja 2011 g.) / Pod red. E. V. Pechenkovoj, M. V. Falikman. M.: Vash poligraficheskij partner, 2011. S. 46–50.
  3. Lapteva E. M. Fenomen podskazki v reshenii zadach: kognitivnyj i emocional'nyj aspekty. Avtoreferat diss. ... kand. psihol. nauk. M., 2012.
  4. Lapteva E. M., Valueva E. A. Fenomen podskazki pri reshenii zadach: vzgljad so storony psihologii tvorchestva. Chast' 1. Prajming-jeffekty // Psihologija. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki. 2011. T. 8. № 4. S. 134–146.
  5. Ljusin D. V. Vlijanie emocij na kreativnost' // Tvorchestvo: ot biologicheskih predposylok k kul'turnym fenomenam / Kollektivnaja monografija pod red. D. V. Ushakova. M.: Izdatel'stvo IP RAN, 2011. S. 372–389.
  6. Medyncev A. A. Vlijanie rezul'tatov vypolnenija pobochnogo zadanija na kolichestvo «reshenij ozarenijami» pri razgadyvanii anagramm // Materialy itogovoj nauchnoj konferencii Instituta psihologii RAN (24–25 fevralja 2011 goda). M.: Institut psihologii RAN, 2011.
  7. Tihomirov O. K. Psihologija myshlenija. M.: Akademija, 2008.
  8. Ushakov D. V. Jazyki psihologii tvorchestva: Ja.A. Ponomarev i ego shkola // Psihologija tvorchestva. Shkola Ja. A. Ponomareva / Pod red. D.V. Ushakova. M.: Izd-vo «Institut psihologii RAN», 2006. S. 19–143.
  9. Ushakov D. V., Belova S. S., Valueva E. A. Ot psihologii tvorchestva k metodologii psihologii: k 90-letiju so dnja rozhdenija Jakova Aleksandrovicha Ponomareva // Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2011. № 2. S. 125–132.
  10. Alpers G. W., Pauli P. Emotional pictures predominate in binocular rivalry // Cognition & Emotion. 2006. V. 20. P. 596–607.
  11. Amiez C., Procyk E., Honore J., Sequeira H., Joseph J.-P. Reward anticipation, cognition, and electrodermal activity in the conditioned monkey // Experimental Brain Research. 2003. V. 149. P. 267–275.
  12. Ashby F., Isen A. M., Turken U. A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition // Psychological Review. 1999. V.106. № 3. P. 529–550.
  13. Baas M., De Dreu C. K., Nijstad B. A. A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? // Psychol. Bull. 2008. V. 134. № 6. P. 779-806.
  14. Bechara A., Damasio H., Tranel D., Damasio A. R. Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy // Science. 1997. V. 275. P. 1293–1295.
  15. Bless H., Fiedler K. Mood and the regulation of information processing and behavior. // Hearts and minds: Affective influences on social cognition and behaviour / Ed. J. P. Forgas. New York: Psychology Press, 2006. P. 65–84.
  16. Bocanegra B. R., Zeelenberg R. Emotion improves and impairs early vision // Psych. Sci., 2009. V. 20. P. 707–713.
  17. Bowman C. H., Evans C. E., Turnbull O. H. Artificial time constraints on the Iowa Gambling Task: the effects on behavioural performance and subjective experience // Brain and Cognition. 2005. V. 57. № 1. P. 21–25.
  18. Burton L. A., Rabin L., Wyatt G., Frohlich J., Bernstein V. S., Dimitri D. Priming effects for affective vs. neutral faces // Brain and Cognition. 2005. V. 59. № 3. P. 322–329.
  19. Damasio A. R., Tranel D., Damasio H. Somatic markers and the guidance of behaviour: theory and preliminary testing // Frontal Lobe Function and Dysfunction / Eds. H. S. Levin, H. M. Eisenberg, A. L. Benton. N Y: Oxford University Press, 1991. P. 217–229.
  20. Davis M. A. Understanding the relationship between mood and creativity: A meta-analysis // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2009. V. 108. № 1. P. 25–38.
  21. Davis T., Love B. C., Maddox W. T. Anticipatory emotions in decision tasks: covert markers of value or attentional processes? // Cognition. 2009. V. 112. P. 195–200.
  22. de Dreu C. K. W., Baas M., Giacomantonia M. Processing modes and creativity: Why (not)? // Psychological Inquiry. 2010. V. 21. № 3. P. 202–208.
  23. De Dreu C. K. W., Baas M., Nijstad B. A. Hedonic tone and activation in the mood–creativity link: Towards a dual pathway to creativity model // J. of Pers. and Soc. Psych., 2008. V. 94. P. 739–756.
  24. Dunn B. D., Dalgleish T., Lawrence A. D. The somatic marker hypothesis: A critical evaluation // Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2006. V. 30. P. 239–271.
  25. Forgas J. P. Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM) // Psychol. Bul. 1995. V. 117. P. 39–66.
  26. Hamann S., Ely T., Grafton S., Kilts C. Amygdala activity related to enhanced memory for pleasant and aversive stimuli // Nature Neuroscience. 1999. V. 2. P. 289–293.
  27. Holyoak K. J., Koh K. Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer // Memory & Cognition. 1987. V. 15. P. 332–340.
  28. Ihssen N., Keil A. The costs and benefits of processing emotional stimuli during Rapid Serial Visual Presentation // Cognition & Emotion. 2009. V. 23. № 2. P. 296–326.
  29. Kaufmann G. Expanding the mood–creativity equation // Creativity Res. J. 2003. V. 15. № 2–3. P. 131–135.
  30. Kaufmann G., Vosburg S. K. ‘‘Paradoxical” mood effects on creative problem solving // Cognition and Emotion. 1997. V. 11. № 2. P. 151–170.
  31. Kaufmann G., Vosburg S. K. Mood effects in early and late idea generation // Creativity Res. J. 2002. V. 14. № 3–4. P. 317–330.
  32. Keil A., Ihssen N. Identification facilitation for emotionally arousing verbs during the attentional blink // Emotion. 2004. V. 4. № 1. P. 23–35.
  33. Knutson B., Greer S. M. Anticipatory affect: neural correlates and consequences for choice // Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 2008. V. 363. № 1511. P. 3771–3786.
  34. Maia T. V., McClelland J. L. The somatic marker hypothesis: Still many questions but no answers. Response to Bechara et al. // Trends in Cogn. Sci. 2005. V. 9. P. 162–164.
  35. Mathewson K. J., Arnell K. M., Mansfield C. A. Capturing and holding attention: The impact of emotional words in rapid serial visual presentation // Memory & Cognition. 2008. V. 36. P. 182–200.
  36. McKenna F. P., Sharma D. Intrusive cognitions: An investigation of the emotional Stroop task // J. of Exp. Psych.: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1995. V. 21. № 6. P. 1595–1607.
  37. Most S. B., Chun M. M., Widders D. M., Zald D. H. Attentional rubbernecking: Cognitive control and personality in emotion-induced blindness // Psychonomic Bulletin & Rev. 2005. V. 12. P. 654–661.
  38. Most S. B., Smith S. D., Cooter A. B., Levy B. N., Zald D. H. The naked truth: Positive, arousing distractors impair rapid target perception // Cognition & Emotion. 2007. V. 21. P. 964–981.
  39. Ossowski U., Malinen S., Helton W. S. The effects of emotional stimuli on target detection: Indirect and direct resource costs // Consciousness and Cognition. 2011. V. 20. № 4. P. 1649–1658.
  40. Phelps E. A., Ling S., Carrasco M. Emotion facilitates perception and potentiates the perceptual benefits of attention // Psych. Sci. 2006. V. 17. № 4. P. 292–299.
  41. Reimann M., Bechara A. The somatic marker framework as a neurological theory of decision-making: Review, conceptual comparisons, and future neuroeconomics research // J. of Economic Psych. 2010. V. 31. № 5. P. 767–776.
  42. Schwarz N. Feeling as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states // Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior / Eds. R. Sorrentino, E. T. Higgins. N. Y.: Guilford Press, 1990. V. 2. P. 527–561.
  43. Seifert C. M., Meyer D. E., Davidson N., Patalano A. L., Yaniv I. Demystification of cognitive insight: Opportunistic assimilation and the prepared-mind perspective // The Nature of Insight / Eds. R. J. Sternberg, J. E. Davidson. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1995. P. 65–124.
  44. Slepian M. L., Weisbuch M., Rutchick A. M., Newman L. S., Ambady N. Shedding light on insight: Priming bright ideas // J. of Exp. Soc. Psych. 2010. V. 46. № 4. P. 696–700.
  45. Vosburg S. K. The effect of positive and negative mood on divergent thinking performance. // Creativity Res. J. 1998 a. V. 11. № 2. P. 165–172.
  46. Vosburg S. K. Mood and the quantity and quality of ideas // Creativity Res. J. 1998 b. V. 11. № 4. P. 315–324.
  47. Yaniv I., Meyer D. Activation and metacognition of inaccessible stored information: Potential bases for incubation effects in problem solving // J. of Exp. Psych.: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 1987. V. 13. P. 187–205.
  48. Zeelenberg R., Wagenmakers E. J., Rotteveel M. The impact of emotion on perception: Bias or enhanced processing? // Psych. Sci. 2006. V. 17. P. 287–291.
  49. Zeelenberg R., Bocanegra B. R. Auditory emotional cues enhance visual perception // Cognition. 2010. V. 115. P. 202–206.

Information About the Authors

Ekaterina A. Valueva, PhD in Psychology, Research Fellow, The Laboratory of the Psychology and Psychophysiology of Creativity, Institute of Psychology of RAS, Leading Research Fellow, Center of Applied Psychological and Pedagogical Studies, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3637-287X, e-mail: ekval@list.ru

Ani E. Mosinyan, Graduate of the State Academic University of the Humanitarian Sciences, Moscow, Russia

Ekaterina M. Lapteva, PhD in Psychology, Researcher, Laboratory for Psychology and Psychophysiology of Creativity, Institute of Psychology of RAS, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3051-6492, e-mail: ek.lapteva@gmail.com

Metrics

Views

Total: 5114
Previous month: 25
Current month: 33

Downloads

Total: 1899
Previous month: 11
Current month: 10