Isostatic oculomotor patterns in trust perception by facial expressions

359

Abstract

The article presents the results of analysis of the study in perceptual confidence in Russian and Tuvinian ethnic groups. The objective of the analysis were, the “isostatic” fixation patterns that characterize the perception of representatives of different ethnic and racial groups causing and not causing confidence. It is shown that the isostatic patterns of analytical type are significantly more frequent in the observers when, regardless of ethnic or racial type of the sitters, faces that do not inspire confidence are perceived.

General Information

Keywords: eye movements, isostatic patterns, fixation, ethnos, race, facial expression, perceptual confidence

Journal rubric: Psychology of Perception

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2018110406

Funding. The research was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, assignment 25.3916.2017/ PC “Cross-cultural determinants of cognitive-communicative processes”.

For citation: Basiul I.A., Demidov A.A., Diveev D.A. Isostatic oculomotor patterns in trust perception by facial expressions. Eksperimental'naâ psihologiâ = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2018. Vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 70–78. DOI: 10.17759/exppsy.2018110406. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Ananyeva K.I., Barabanschikov V.А., Kharitonov А.N. Izostaticheskie patterny dvizhenij glaz pri vospriyatii chelovecheskogo litsa [Isostatic patterns of eye movements in the perception of a human face]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya v Rossii: traditsii I perspektivy [Experimental psychology in Russia: traditions and perspectives] / Pod red. V.А. Barabanschikova. Moscow: Izd-vo «Institut psikhologii RАN». 2010, pp. 195—200. (In Russ.).
  2. Ananyeva K.I., Basul I.А., Kharitonov А.N. Izostaticheskie okulomotornye patterny pri zritel’nom vospriyatii lits svoej I drugoj rasy [Isostatic oculomotor patterns in the visual perception of their own and other race]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental Psychology (Russia)]. 2017. T. 10. № 4, pp. 133— 147. doi:10.17759/exppsy.2017100409. (In Russ.).
  3. Basul I.А., Demidov А.А., Diveev D.А. Zakonomernosti okulomotornoj aktivnosti predstavitelej russkogo I tuvinskogo ehtnosov pri otsenke pertseptivnogo doveriya po vyrazheniyam lits [Patterns of near-motor activity of representatives of the Russian and Tuvinian ethnic groups in assessing perceptual confidence in expressions of persons]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental Psychology (Russia)]. T. 10. № 4, pp. 148—162. doi:10.17759/exppsy.2017100410. (In Russ.).
  4. Caldara R., Zhou X., Miellet S. Putting culture under the “Spotlight” reveals universal information use for face recognition // PLoS One. 2010. Vol. 5. e9708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009708
  5. Caldara, R., Schyns. P., Mayer, E., Smith, M., Gosselin, F., &Rossion, B. (2005). Does prosopagnosia take the eyes out of face representations? Evidence for a defect in representing diagnostic facial information following brain damage. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, pp. 1652—1666.
  6. Demidov А.А., Аnanyeva K.I. Okulomotornaya aktivnost’ pri vospriyatii lits: osnovnye napravleniya issledovanij / Аjtreking v psikhologicheskoj nauke I praktike [Eyetreking in psychological science and practice] / Otv. red. V.А. Barabanshhikov. Moscow: Kogito-TSentr, 2015, pp. 64—77. (In Russ.).
  7. Gosselin F., & Schyns P.G. Bubbles: a technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks. Vision Research, Vol. 41, Is. 17, 2001, pp. 2261—2271, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00097-9.
  8. Kelly D.J., Miellet S., Caldara R. Culture shapes eye movements for visually homogeneous objects. Frontiers in Psychology. 2010. 1:6. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00006
  9. Kuhn G., & Tatler, B. W. (2005). Magic and Fixation: Now You Don’t See it, Now You Do. Perception, 34(9), 1155—1161. https://doi.org/10.1068/p3409bn1
  10. Posner M.I. (1980). Orienting of Attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), pp. 3—25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335558008248231

Information About the Authors

Ivan A. Basiul, Junior Researcher. Laboratory of Cognitive Processes and Mathematical Psychology, Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Lecturer of the Department of General Psychology, Moscow Institute of Psychoanalysis, Research laboratory assistant, Institute of Experimental Psychology of MSPPU, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3153-2096, e-mail: basul@inbox.ru

Alexander A. Demidov, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Department of General Psychology, Moscow Institute of Psychoanalysis, Senior Researcher at the Institute of Experimental Psychology, MSUPE, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6660-5761, e-mail: demidov@inpsycho.ru

Dmitry A. Diveev, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor of the Department of General Psychology, Moscow Institute of Psychoanalysis, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2826-4185, e-mail: diveev2@gmail.com

Metrics

Views

Total: 1595
Previous month: 11
Current month: 3

Downloads

Total: 359
Previous month: 2
Current month: 2