Metacognitive abilities in the elderly: specificity and predictors

Elderly is characterized by changes in metacognitive functions in the form of social and emotional selectivity. Compared to 55—60 years, 61—74 and 75—90 years old people have observed changes in social metacognitive effectiveness. There are more changes in the cognitive than emotional (recognition, differentiation of emotions in the face) component of the theory of mind. These changes are characterized by a deficit in the evaluation of higher-order representations of other people’s mental states. In later age there is the phenomenon of denial of socio-cognitive changes or age-specific cognitive anosognosia. Common predictors of social metacognitive effectiveness are identified: the presence and severity of symptoms of depression, anxiety, changes in satisfaction with the quality of life (physical, mental health, social activity, environmental safety). It is shown that in old age (75—90 years) changes in autonomy are predictors of understanding of emotional states in the face and deception by other people.

1. Avondino E. Predictors of cognitive anosognosia in older adults with suspected dementia // Psychological Disorders and Research. 2018. Vol. 1. № 2. P. 1—6. doi: 10.31487/j.PDR.2018.02.001
2. Bailey H., Dunlosky J., Hertzog C. Metacognitive training at home: does it improve older adults learning? // Gerontology. 2010. Vol. 56. № 4. P. 414—420. doi: 10.1159/000266030
3. Banna M., Redha N.A., Abdulla F. Metacognitive function poststroke: a review of definition and assessment.// J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016. Vol. 87. № 2. P. 161—166. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2015- 310305
4. Calso C., Besnard J., Allain P. Frontal Lobe Functions in Normal Aging: Metacognition, Autonomy, and Quality of Life // Exp Aging Res. 2019. Vol. 45. № 1. P. 10—27. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2018.1560105
5. Christidi F., Migliaccio R., Santamaría-García H. Social Cognition Dysfunctions in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Neuroanatomical Correlates and Clinical Implications. //Behavioural neurology, 2018, Vol. 10. P. 18—25. doi: 10.1155/2018/1849794
6. Cotter J., Granger K., Backx R. Social cognitive dysfunction as a clinical marker: A systematic review of meta-analyses across 30 clinical conditions // Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018. Vol. 84. P. 92—99. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.
7. Gonçalves AR, Fernandes C, Pasion R, Ferreira-Santos F, Barbosa F, Marques-Teixeira J. Effects of age on the identification of emotions in facial expressions: a meta-analysis. Peer J. 2018. Vol. 4. Р. 1—11. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5278.
8. Gonçalves A.R., Fernandes C., Pasion R. Effects of age on the identification of emotions in facial expressions: a meta-analysis // Peerj. 2018.Vol. 6. P. 1—19. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5278
9. Hasson-Ohayon I., Mashiach-Eizenberg M., Arnon-Ribenfeld N. Neuro-cognition and social cognition elements of social functioning and social quality of life // Psychiatry Res. 2017. Vol. 258. P. 538—543. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017
10. Kühne F., Meister R., Jansen A. Effectiveness of metacognitive interventions for mental disorders in adults: a systematic review protocol (METACOG) // BMJ Open 2017. Vol. 7. P. 1—17. doi: 10.1136/ bmjopen-2016-015428
11. Moritz S., Lysaker P.H., Hofmann S.G. Going meta on metacognitive interventions // Expert Rev Neurother. 2018. Vol. 10. P. 739—741. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2018.1520636.
12. Palmer E.C., David A.S., Fleming S.M. Effects of age on metacognitive efficiency.// Consciousness and cognition. 2014. Vol. 28. P. 151—160. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.06.007
13. Tauber S., Witherby A. Metacognition in Older Adulthood // Encyclopedia of Geropsychology/ed. N.A. Pachana, 2016, USA, Springer, p. 1—15. doi: 10.1007/978-981-287-080-3_215-1