Development and approbation of the methodology for determining the individual negotiating style

The article presents the results of development and approbation of the method for determining the negotiation style of the personality. The methodology is based on the idea of the presence of integrative and distributive styles of negotiation. Among the distinctive features of the integrative style areorientation on collective problem solving, achieving win-win solutions, establishing a productive interaction. The distributive style is characterized by the orientation of the subject on maximizing of his own profit, often to the detriment of another, the lack of focus on long-term collaboration, the perception of the partner as a method of reaching his own goals. The approbation has been conducted on a sample of 776 people. A three-component factor structure, including such scales as “Distributive style”, “Integrative style/partner oriented” and “Integrative style /situation oriented”, has been allocated. The data obtained during the psychometric evaluation of the method indicate its consistency, reliability and validity, which allows to make a conclusion on the effectiveness of the method and the possibility to use it in the studies of the peculiarities of the negotiation process.

1. Argentova Т.Е. Stil obshcheniya kak faktor ehffektivnosti sovmestnoj deyatelnosti [The style of communication as a factor in the effectiveness of joint activity] // Psihol. journal. 1984. No. 6. P. 130— 133.
2. Asmolov A.G., Soldatova G.U., Nestik T.A., Terekhova E.S., Evdokimenko A.S. Psihologiya peregovorov // Innovacionnye obrazovatel’nye programmy po psihologii / Pod red. YU.P. Zinchenko, I.A. Volodarskoj. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 2007. P. 12—23
3. Bratchenko, S.L. Diagnostika lichnostno-razvivayushchegosya potenciala. Metod. Posobie dlya shkolnyh psihologov [Diagnosis of personality-developing potential: Method. A manual for school psychologists] / SL Bratchenko. Pskov: 1997. 68 p.
4. Behg’yuli F. Peregovory. Master-klass. M.: FАIR-PRESS, 2005. 224 s.
5. Grishina N.V. Psihologiya konflikta [Psychology of conflict]. SPb., 2007.
6. Ignateva E. A. Vyyavlenie urovnya sformirovannosti kommunikativnyh umenij virtualnogo obshcheniya [Elektronnyj resurs] Psihologo-pedagogicheskie issledovaniya 2011 4 URL http psyedu ru journal, 2011, № 4 URL: http://psyedu.ru/journal/2011/4/2581.phtml (Data obrashcheniya: 1 10 2018).
7. Karmin A.S. Konfliktologiya [Conflictology]. SPb .: Publishing house “Lan”, 1999. 448 p.
8. Kennedi G. Dogovorit’sya mozhno obo vsem! Kak dobivat’sya maksimuma v lyubykh peregovorakh. M.: Аl’pina Pablisher, 2018 410 s.
9. Kunitsyna V.N., Kazarinova N.V., Pogolsha V.M. Mezhlichnostnoe obshchenie. Uchebnik dlya vuzov [Interpersonal communication. Textbook for high schools]. St. Petersburg: Peter, 2001. 544 p.
10. Kurbatov V.I. Strategiya delovogo uspekha. Uchebnoe posobie dlya studentov vuzov [Strategy of business success. Textbook for university students]. Rostov-on-Don. Publishing house “Phoenix”, 1995, 416 with.
11. Lebedeva M.M. Politicheskoe uregulirovanie konfliktov. Ucheb. posobie [Political Conflict Resolution: Proc. Allowance]. — Moscow: Aspect Press, 1999. 271 p.
12. Latynov V.V. Stili rechevogo kommunikativnogo povedeniya: struktura i determinanty [Styles of speech communicative behavior: structure and determinants] // Psychological journal. 1995. № 6. С. 90—100.
13. Mastenbrook V. Peregovory [Negotiations]. Kaluga: Kaluga Institute of Sociology, 1993. 175 p.
14. Mokshantsev R.I. Psihologiya peregovorov. Ucheb. posobie [Psychology of negotiations. Textbook Allowance]. M .: INFRA-M; Novosibirsk: Siberian Agreement, 2002. 352 p.
15. Satikova S.V. Problema integracii v povsednevnyh peregovorah [The problem of integration in everyday negotiations] // Proceedings of the conference Psychological and social work in modern society: problems and solutions. 2010, pp. 317—319.
16. Sobchik L.N. Metody psihologicheskoj diagnostiki [Methods of psychological diagnosis]. Issue. 3. Diagnostics of interpersonal relationships. Modified version of interpersonal diagnosis T. Leary. Method. guide. M., 1990.
17. Spengle ML, Eisenhart M.U. Peregovory. Reshenie problem v raznom kontekste [Conversation. Solving problems in different contexts]. — Humanitarian Center, 2009. 592 p.
18. Subbotsky E.V. Izuchenie u rebenka smyslovyh obrazovanij [The study of the semantic formations in the child] // Vestnik Mosk.un-ta. Ser. 14, Psychology, 1977. № 1.
19. Fetiskin NP, Kozlov VV, Manuylov G.М. Socialno-psihologicheskaya diagnostika razvitiya lichnosti i malyh grupp [Socio-psychological diagnosis of personality development and small groups]. M., Publishing house of the Institute of Psychotherapy. 2002. C. 153—156 Diagnosis of the level of polycommunicative empathy (I. Yusupov).
20. Fisher R., Uri U. Put k soglasiyu ili peregovory bez porazheniya [The path to agreement, or negotiations without defeat]. Science, 1992.
21. Fisher R., Shapiro D. Emotsional’nyj intellekt v peregovorakh — M.: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 2015 336 s.
22. Shermerron J., Hunt J., Osborn R. Organizacionnoe povedenie [Organizational Behavior]. Peter, 2004.
23. Alfredson T., Cungu A. Negotiation Theory and Practice: A Review of the Literature — EASYPol Module 179, 2008.
24. Bazerman M.H. Negotiator judgment: A critical look at the rationality assumption. — Cambridge, 1991
25. Keltner J.W. The management of struggle: Elements of dispute resolution through negotiation, mediation and arbitration. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 1994.
26. Lewicki R.J., Barry B., Saunders D.M. and John M.W., 2003. Negotiation, 4th edition, McGraw-Hill/ Irwin.
27. Walton R.E., McKersie R.B. A Behavioral Theory of Labour Negotiation. New York, McGraw Hill, 1965.