Remembering Contradiction Information in the Light of the Hypothesis of an Unconscious Search for a Resolution of Contradictions

963

Abstract

Contradictory information is changed in the subject’s mind: sometimes contradictions are not noticed, smoothed out, superseded, but sometimes they attract attention, become more contradictory and are well remembered. It can be a result of two different mechanisms: the contradiction avoidance mechanism and contradiction resolution mechanism. The avoidance mechanism starts working before the contradictions are conscious (and it makes them worse for remembering), and the solution mechanism starts working after the contradictions are conscious (and it makes them better for remembering). In our experiments, we have shown that contradictory information is better reproduced with a clue and it is better identified as compared to non-contradictory information, if the contradiction resolution mechanism works for a longer time. In experiments 2 and 3 this was done by creating a readiness of subjects to recognize information as contradictory by presenting block of contradictory sentences; in experiment 4 the time interval between presenting information and reproduction was increased. In the light of our hypothesis, the results of other studies on the processing of conscious and unconscious contradictions considered.

General Information

Keywords: memorization, contradictions, conflict information, recognition, reproduction

Journal rubric: Cognitive Psychology

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2020130102

Funding. The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project № 18-00- 00646 К (18-00-00646).

For citation: Starodubcev A.S., Allakhverdov V.M. Remembering Contradiction Information in the Light of the Hypothesis of an Unconscious Search for a Resolution of Contradictions. Eksperimental'naâ psihologiâ = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2020. Vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 20–34. DOI: 10.17759/exppsy.2020130102. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Allahverdov V.M. Opyt teoreticheskoj psihologii (v zhanre nauchnoj reVolyucii) [Experience of theoretical psychology (in the genre of scientific reVolution)] Saint Petersburg.: Pechatnyj dvor [Printing yard], 1993. 325 p. (in Russ.).
  2. Allahverdov V. M. Soznanie-kazhushcheesya i real’noe [apparent and real consciousness]. Metodologiya i istoriya psihologii [methodology and history of psychology], 2009 Vol. 4, No. 1, p. 137. (in Russ.).
  3. Allakhverdov V.M. Soznanie kak paradoks. Eksperimental’naya psikhologika [Сonsciousness as a paradox. Experimental psychologic]. Saint Petersburg: DNK, Publ., 2000. 321 p. (in Russ.).
  4. Gerbart I.F. Psihologiya/Iogann Fridrih Gerbart [Psychology / Johann Friedrich Herbart]. Moscow: Territoriya budushchego [Territory of the future], 2007. 288 p. (in Russ.).
  5. Gregori R.L. Razumnyj glaz [The intelligent eye]. Moscow: Editorial URSS Publ., 2003. 240 p. (in Russ.).
  6. Zaika E.V. Eksperimental’nye issledovaniya pamyati. Osnovnye metodiki i rezul’taty issledovanii [Experimental memory studies. Basic techniques and research results]. Krakov: Gumanitarnyi tsentr [Humanitarian center], Publ., 2013. 394 p. (in Russ.).
  7. Zinchenko T. Pamyat’ v eksperimental’noi i kognitivnoi psikhologii [Memory in experimental and cognitive psychology]. Saint Petersburg: «Piter». Publ., 2002. 322 p. (in Russ.).
  8. Kozulin A. Oposredstvovanie: psikhicheskaya deyatel’nost’ i psikhologicheskie orudiya [Mediation: mental activity and psychological instuments]. Voprosy psikhologii [Psychology issues]. Publ., 1994. № 4. Pp. 100—108. (in Russ.).
  9. Kupriyanov I.V. (2016). Raschet velichiny effekta pri primenenii neparametricheskikh kriteriev sravneniya vyborok v psikhologicheskikh issledovaniyakh s ispol’zovaniem programmy R [Calculation of the magnitude of the effect when using non-parametric criteria for comparing samples in psychological studies using the R program]. Inzhenernyi vestnik Dona [Engineering Bulletin of the Don]. Vol. 41 (2). 2016. (in Russ.).
  10. Mamina T.M. Vliyanie aktualizatsii znachenii mnogoznachnogo slova na vospriyatie i zapominanie: dis. kand. psikhol. nauk [The influence of the actual values of a polysemous word on reproduction and memorization. Ph. D. (Psychology)]. Saint Petersburg, 2001. 154 p. (in Russ.).
  11. Machinskaya R. I. Upravlyayushchie sistemy mozga [Control systems of the brain]. Zhurnal vysshei nervnoi deyatel’nosti im. IP Pavlova [Journal of Higher Nervous Activity IP Pavlova], 2015 Vol. 65 (1), pp. 33—33. doi: 10.7868/S0044467715010086. (in Russ.)
  12. Medvedev S.V. Natal’ya Bekhtereva — kakoi my ee znali [Natalya Bekhtereva — how we knew her]. in S.V. Medvedeva (ed). sb. Statei p[digest of articles] Moscow.: Publ. AST, 2009. 256 p. (in Russ.).
  13. Naumenko O.V., Voskresenskaya E.Y., Okoneshnikova N.P. Vozniknovenie effekta generacii pri pred”yavlenii slov s opechatkami [Generation effect on presentation of words with errors] // Materialy mezhdunarodnoj mezhvuzovskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii studentov, aspirantov i molodyh specialistov «Psihologiya 21 veka» [Materials of the international inter-university scientific-practical conference of students, graduate students and young specialistsPsychology of the 21st century”] Saint Petersburg: Saint PetersburgGU, 2005. pp. 49—50. (in Russ.).
  14. Naumenko O.V., Kostina D.I. Vliyanie nerelevantnoi verbal’noi satiatsii na vyrazhennost’ negativnogo praiming-effekta [The effect of irrelevant verbal saturation on the severity of negative priming effect]. Vestnik Saint PetersburgGU. Psikhologiya i pedagogika [Psychology and pedagogy]. Publ., 2017. Vol. 7. No 4. Pp. 328—342. doi:10.21638/11701/Saint Petersburgu16.2017.403. (in Russ.).
  15. Olekhnovich M.O. Kognitivnoe smeshchenie pod vozdeistviem irrelevantnoi informatsii: dis. kand. psikhol. nauk [Cognitive bias due to irrelevant information. Ph. D. (Psychology)] Saint Petersburg, 2002. 143 p. (in Russ.).
  16. Smirnov, A. A. Problemy psihologii pamyati [Problems of the psychology of memory]. Moscow: Publ. Education. 1966 423 p. (in Russ).
  17. Tikhomirov O.K. Iskusstvennyi intellekt i psikhologiya [Artificial intelligence and psychology]. Moscow: Nauka [Science]. Publ., 1976. 344 p. (in Russ.).
  18. Ushakov D.N. Tolkovyj slovar’ russkogo yazyka: v 4-h t.3 [Elektronnyj resurs] [Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language in 4 v., Volume 3]. Moscow.: Gos. in-t «Sov. encikl., 1935-1940. URL: https:// povto.ru/russkie/slovari/tolkovie/ushakova/tom-3/ushakov-tom-3_0513.htm (Accessed 02.12.2019). (in Russ.).
  19. Ushinskij K. Pedagogicheskaya antropologiya [Pedagogical anthropology]., Vol.1, Moscow: YUrajt, 2017, p. 419. (in Russ.).
  20. Festinger L. Teoriya kognitivnogo dissonansa: Per. s ang. [A theory of cognitive dissonance] Saint Petersburg.: Rech’ [Speech], 2000. 317 p. (in Russ.)
  21. Chernigovskaya T.V. Eto ne ya-eto moj mozg… Opasnye vremena dlya chelovecheskogo v cheloveke [This is not me — this is my brain ... Dangerous times for the human being in man]. Otechestvennye zapiski [national notes], 2013, no. 1. p. 52. (In Russ.).
  22. Evristicheskii potentsial kontseptsii Ya. A. Ponomareva [Heuristic potential of the concept by Ya.A. Ponomarev]. Allakhverdov i dr.. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Psychological journal]. 2015, Vol. 36 (6) Pp. 24—34. (in Russ.).
  23. Botvinick M. M. et al. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological review, 2001, Vol. 108, no. 3, p. 624. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624.
  24. Kafkas A., Montaldi D. Expectation affects learning and modulates memory experience at retrieval. Cognition. — 2018. Vol. 180. Pp. 123—134. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.07.010.
  25. N400 ERPs for actions: building meaning in context. Amoruso L. et al.. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2013. Vol. 7. P. 57. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00057
  26. The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty / Kaan E. et al.. Language and cognitive processes. 2000. Vol. 15. No. 2. pp. 159—201. doi: 10.1080/016909600386084.
  27. Van Herten M., Chwilla D.J., Kolk H.H.J. When heuristics clash with parsing routines: ERP evidence for conflict monitoring in sentence perception. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2006, Vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 1181—1197. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1181.

Information About the Authors

Aleksey S. Starodubcev, Researcher, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Saint Petersburg State University”, St.Petersburg, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9322-6911, e-mail: fleksbr@yandex.ru

Victor M. Allakhverdov, Doctor of Psychology, Professor of the Department of General Psychology, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Saint Petersburg State University”, President of the St. Petersburg Psychological Society, chairman of the program committee of the III Congress of the RPO, chairman of the expert council of the RPO, member of the editorial board of the scientific journal “Methodology and History of Psychology”., St.Petersburg, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6753-0300, e-mail: vimiall@gmail.com

Metrics

Views

Total: 1633
Previous month: 20
Current month: 8

Downloads

Total: 963
Previous month: 8
Current month: 1