The Long-Term Effect of Low Recognition of To-Be-Forgotten Items Requires an Intention to Forget in Conjunction with a Means of Doing So

In the present paper, we reviewed the studies relevant to the issue of intentional forgetting and assumed that it would be reasonable to examine whether the intention to forget itself decreases the probability to retrieve the to-be-forgotten stimulus or it should be combined with forgetting-evoking means. We reported the empirical study intended to verify their independence or interdependence. 20 Russian — made up language word pairs were exposed to participants (N = 71) three times. They then viewed each Russian word from a pair once, with randomized instructions “Forget”, “Remember”, “Repeat”, “Forget by generating associations to the Russian word” or a short cognitive task. Self-reports on the mnemonic strategies were collected. Recognition tests were administered two times — four hours and two months (N = 32) later. The probability to succeed by chance was 1 to 3. The main findings consisted of the fact that at two months delay the made-up words in the “Forget” and the “Remember” conditions were recognized the best, the words that were not processed in the context of any conscious mnemonic goals (“Repeat” and “Task”) were recognized worse, and the words in the “Forget by generating associations to the Russian word” condition were recognized the worst. This result brings us to the conclusion that the intention to achieve any goal with mnemonic content itself protects the material from forgetting at long time intervals. In contrast, the conjunction of mnemonic goal with congruent means might form a psychological tool that makes possible to keep the initial intention effective.

Bjork R. A., LaBerge D., Legrand R. The modification of short-term memory through instructions to forget. Psychonomic Science, 1968, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 55–56.

Basden B. H., Basden D. R., Gargano G. J. Directed forgetting in implicit and explicit memory tests: A comparison of methods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 1993, vol. 19, pp. 603–616.

MacLeod C. M. Directed forgetting. Intentional forgetting: Interdisciplinary approaches. Ed. by J. M. Golding, C. M. MacLeod. Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1998, pp. 1–57.

Block R. A. Effects of instructions to forget in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971, vol. 89, pp. 1–9.

Elmes D. G., Adams C. A., Roediger H. L. Cued forgetting in short-term memory: Response selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970, vol. 86, pp. 103–107.

Gofman A. A., Nourkova V. V. Namerennoe zabyvanie: sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy issledovanii [Intentional Forgetting: Current Status and Future Prospects of Research]. Natsional’nyi psikhologicheskii zhurnal [National Psychological Journal], 2018, no. 11 (3), pp. 117–128. (In Russian)

Gershkovich V. A. Celenapravlennoe ignorirovanie v mnemicheskoj deyatel’nosti [Intentional ignoring in mnemonic activity: Thesis of PhD Diss. ]. St. Petersburg, 2006, 164 p. (In Russian)

Basden B. H. Directed forgetting: Further comparisons of the item and list methods. Memory, 1996, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 633–654.

Macleod C. M. The item and list methods of directed forgetting: Test differences and the role of

demand characteristics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1999, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 123–129.

Sahakyan L., Foster N. L. Intentional forgetting of actions: Comparison of list-method and itemmethod

directed forgetting. Journal of Memory and Language, 2009, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 134–152.

Nichols A. L., Maner J. K. The good-subject effect: Investigating participant demand characteristics. The Journal of general psychology, 2008, vol. 135, pp. 151–166.

Woodward Jr. A. E., Bjork R. A., Jongeward Jr. R. H. Recall and recognition as a function of primary rehearsal. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973, vol. 12, no. 6. pp. 608–617.

Bjork R. Theoretical implications of directed forgetting. Coding processes in human memory. Ed. by A. W. Melton, W. Martin. Washington, DC, V. H. Winston & Sons, Inc, 1972, pp. 217–235.

Golding J. M., Gottlob L. R. Recall order determines the magnitude of directed forgetting in the within-participants list method. Memory & Cognition, 2005, vol. 33, pp. 588–594.

Sahakyan L., Kelley C. M. A contextual change account of the directed forgetting effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2002, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1064–1072.

Gershkovich V. A. Eksplitsitnoe ignorirovanie v mnemicheskoi deyatel’nosti [Explicit Omission in Mnemonic Activity]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural-Historical Psychology], 2009. no. 2, pp. 51–59. (In Russian)

Dulaney C. L., Marks W., Link K. E. Aging and directed forgetting: Pre-cue encoding and post-cue rehearsal effects. Experimental Aging Research, 2004, vol. 30, pp. 95–112.

Velichkovskii B. B. Vozmozhnosti kognitivnoi trenirovki kak metoda korrektsii vozrastnykh narushenii kognitivnogo kontrolya [Performance capabilities of cognitive training as a method of correcting age-related decline in cognitive control]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental psychology (Russia) ], 2009, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 78–91. (In Russian)

Tulving E., Thomson D. M. Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 1973, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 352–373.

Gardiner J. M., Gawlik B., Richardson-Klavehn A. Maintenance rehearsal affects knowing, not remembering; elaborative rehearsal affects remembering, not knowing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1994, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 107–110.

Levy B. J., Anderson M. C. Individual differences in the suppression of unwanted memories: the executive deficit hypothesis. Acta psychological, 2008, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 623–635.

Anderson M. C., Reinholz J., Kuhl B. A., Mayr U. Intentional suppression of unwanted memories grows more difficult as we age. Psychology & Aging, 2011, vol. 26, pp. 397–405.

Failing to Forget Inhibitory-Control Deficits Compromise Memory Suppression in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Catarino A., Küpper C. S., Werner-Seidler A., Dalgleish T., Anderson M. C. Psychological science, 2015, vol. 26, no. 5. pp. 604–616.

Lee Y. S. Cognitive load hypothesis of item-method directed forgetting. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 2012, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 1110–1122.

Benoit R. G., Anderson M. C. Opposing mechanisms support the voluntary forgetting of unwanted memories. Neuron, 2012, vol. 76, pp. 450–460.

Nourkova V. V., Gofman A. A. Zabyvanie: problema nalichiya sleda pamyati, ego dostupnosti i namerennogo kontrolya [Forgetting: availability, accessibility, and intentional control problem]. Natsional’nyi psikhologicheskii zhurnal [National Psychological Journal], 2016a, no. 3 (23), pp. 64–71. (In Russian)

Nourkova V. V., Gofman A. A. Zabyvanie: Problema nalichiya sleda pamyati, ego dostupnosti i namerennogo kontrolya [Forgetting: availability, accessibility, and intentional control problem]. Part 2. Natsional’nyi psikhologicheskii zhurnal [National Psychological Journal], 2016b, no. 4 (24), pp. 3‒13. (In Russian)

Rubinshtein S. L. Osnovy psikhologii [Principles of Psychology]. Moscow, 1935, 496 p. (In Russian)

Ivannikov V. A. Volya [Volition]. Natsional’nyi psikhologicheskii zhurnal [National Psychological Journal], 2010, no. 1 (3), pp. 97–102. (In Russian)

Istomina Z. M. K voprosu o razvitii proizvol’noi pamyati u detei doshkol’nogo vozrasta [On a question about development of preschool children’s voluntary memory]. Doshkol’noe vospitanie [Preschool education], 1953, no. 4, pp. 33–39. (In Russian)

Zinchenko P. I. Neproizvol’noe zapominanie [Involuntary memory]. Moscow, APN RSFSR, 1961, 562 p. (In Russian)

Nourkova V. V. Effekt zavisimosti fenomenologicheskikh kharakteristik mnemicheskogo obraza ot motivatsionno-smyslovoi dinamiki deyatel’nosti [The Dependence of Phenomenological Characteristics of Mnemonic Image from the Motivational-Semantic Dynamics of Activity]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural-Historical Psychology], 2009, no. 2, pp. 60–68. (In Russian)

Nourkova V. V. Current Motivational State May Change the Phenomenology of Recollection Automatically. A New Effect of Activity on Reported Vividness and Confidence. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 2011, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 40–54.

Challis B. H., Velichkovsky B. M., Craik F. I. Levels-of-processing effects on a variety of memory tasks: New findings and theoretical implications. Consciousness and cognition, 1996, vol. 5, no. 1/2, pp. 142–164.

Nourkova V. V., Gofman A. A., Kozlov M. D. On the Very-long-term Effect of Managing One’s Own Memory: the Intention to Forget Improves Recognition at a Year’s Delay. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 2018, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 776–791.

Intending to forget is not easy: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Gao H., Cao B., Zhang Q., Qi M., Li F., Li H. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2016, vol. 104, pp. 1–9.

Jost A. Die Assoziationsfestigkeit in ihrer Abh.ngigkeit von der Verteilung der Wiederholungen. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane, 1897, vol. 16, pp. 436–472.

A memory retrieval-extinction procedure to prevent drug craving and relapse. Xue Y. X., Luo Y. X., Wu P., et al. Science, 2012, vol. 336, pp. 241–245.

Meir Drexler S., Wolf O. T. Behavioral disruption of memory reconsolidation: From bench to bedside and back again. Behavioral neuroscience, 2018, vol. 132, no. 1, pp. 13–22.

Eichenbaum H., Cohen N. J. From conditioning to conscious recollection: memory systems of the brain. New York, Oxford University Press, 2001, 583 p.

Allakhverdov V. M., Voskresenskaya E. Yu., Naumenko O. V. Soznanie i kognitivnoe bessoznatel’noe [Consciousness and the Cognitive Unconscious]. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 12. Psychology and Education, 2008, issue 2, pp. 10–19. (In Russian)

Eremenko V. Vospominanie i znanie kak funktsional’no nezavisimye mnemicheskie yavleniya [Remembering and knowing as functionally independent mnemonic phenomena]. Voprosy psikhologii, 2006, no. 6, pp. 64–73. (In Russian)

Wheeler M. A., Ewers M., Buonanno J. Different rates of forgetting following study versus test trials. Memory, 2003, vol. 11, pp. 571–580.

Roediger H. L. III, Karpicke J. D. Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves longterm retention. Psychological Science, 2006, vol. 17, pp. 249–255.

Roediger H. L. III, Nestojko J. F. The relative benefits of studying and testing on long-term retention. Cognitive modeling in perception and memory: A festschrift for Richard M. Shiffrin. Ed. by J. G. W. Raaijmakers, A. H. Criss, R. L. Goldstone, R. M. Nosofsky, M. Steyvers. New York, Psychology Press, 2015, pp. 99–111.

Roediger H. L. III, Gallo D. A., Geraci L. Processing approaches to cognition: The impetus from the levels-of-processing framework. Memory, 2002, vol. 10, pp. 319–332.