Image of Motherland: Justification and Approbation of Diagnostic Tools

436

Abstract

The topic of patriotic consciousness and patriotic education today claims to the status of a nationwide idea, so the research interest in this issue is unusually high. The study of patriotic consciousness should begin with an analysis of the subject which the patriotic feelings of citizens are directed on. This subject is the motherland and its image in the minds of citizens. The article gives an overview of the data, which is used for the semantic deferential method «Image of Motherland» and the procedure of studying of the image of the Motherland based on this method. The sample was 165 respondents. Based on the results obtained, it is concluded that the use of this methodology is a tool, which lets us to determine social ideas about the image of the Motherland. It has been proved that the image of the Motherland in consciousness reflects the ideas about the country and the state in which the respondents were born and raised, it is not associated with a so-called “Small homeland”, but with a certain commonality of territory, nature and culture. There is reason to believe that the image of the Motherland in the human mind can be viewed as an image “for oneself” and an image “for others”: in the first case, the Motherland is perceived as big and strong, interesting for life and comfortable, simple and cultural; Motherland “for others” is bold and friendly, strong and kind.

General Information

Keywords: consciousness, social representations, image of the motherland, semantic differential

Journal rubric: Tools

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2020130415

For citation: Tarasov M.V. Image of Motherland: Justification and Approbation of Diagnostic Tools. Eksperimental'naâ psihologiâ = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2020. Vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 205–219. DOI: 10.17759/exppsy.2020130415. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Artem’eva E.Ju. Osnovy psihologii sub”ektivnoj semantiki. Pod. Red. I.B. Haninoj. Moscow: Nauka: Smysl, 1999. (In Russ.).
  2. Grigorjan L.K. Patriotizm i nacionalizm v Rossii: mehanizmy vlijanija na jekonomicheskuju samostojatel’nost’. Kul’turno istoricheskaja psihologija 2013. № 3. pp. 22—30. (In Russ.).
  3. Grigorjan L.K., Lepshokova Z.H. Jempiricheskaja model’ vzaimosvjazi grazhdanskoj identichnosti i ustanovok po otnosheniju k immigrantam s jekonomicheskimi predstavlenijami rossijan. Social’naja psihologija i obshhestvo. 2012. № 2. pp. 5—20. (In Russ.).
  4. Guzenina S.V. Obraz Rodiny kak predmet nauchnogo analiza: Monografiya. — Belgorod, 2013. 276 p. (In Russ.).
  5. Guzenina S.V. Tambovchane ob obraze Rodiny: itogi jempiricheskogo issledovanija. Vestnik TGU 2012. vypusk 3 (107). pp. 268—276. (In Russ.).
  6. Kakadij V.I. Patriotic education of youth [Elektronnyi resurs]. Jazyk i tekst langpsy.ru [Language and Text langpsy.ru], 2018, vol. 5, no. 4. Available at: http://psyjournals.ru/langpsy/2018/n4/Kakadij.shtml (Accessed 09.07.2020). (In Russ.).
  7. Klimov E.A. Obraz mira v raznotipnyh professijah. Moscow: MGU, 1995. 224 p. (In Russ.).
  8. Leont’ev D.A. Psihologija smysla: priroda, stroenie i dinamika smyslovoj real’nosti. Moscow: Smysl, 2007. 487 p. (In Russ.).
  9. Makarova O.V. Osobennosti smyslovyh obrazovanij i znachenij slov «Rodina» i «Otech-estvo» u mladshih shkol’nikov. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Serija: Gumanitarnye i social’nye nauki. 2011. № 4. pp. 145—148. (In Russ.).
  10. Makarova O.V., Marakushina I.G. Obraz Rodiny kak soderzhatel’naya osnova sotsiokul’turnoi identichnosti mladshikh shkol’nikov. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya. 2019. № 62—3. pp. 144—146. (In Russ.).
  11. Nalivaichenko I.V. Obraz Rodiny kak ob”ekt patriotizma. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2011. № 5. Ch. 4. pp. 126—130. (In Russ.).
  12. Ozhegov S.I. Tolkovyj slovar’ russkogo jazyka. Moscow: Oniks, 2010. p. 498. (In Russ.).
  13. Popov A.I. Razvitie obraza Rodiny u doshkol’nikov. Avtoref. diss. kand. psikholog. nauk. Volgograd, 2005. (In Russ.).
  14. Petuhov V.V. Obraz mira i psihologicheskoe izuchenie myshlenija. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Serija 14. Psihologija. 1984. № 4. pp. 13—21. (In Russ.).
  15. Pivovarova E.V. S chego nachinaetsja Rodina? Sociologija, 1997. №8. pp. 33—53. (In Russ.).
  16. Radosteva M.V. Patriotism in the history of the development of domestic entrepreneurship [Elektronnyi resurs]. Jazyk i tekst langpsy.ru [Language and Text langpsy.ru], 2018, vol. 5, no. 4. Available at: http:// psyjournals.ru/langpsy/2018/n4/Radosteva.shtml (Accessed 09.07.2020). (In Russ.).
  17. Serkin V.P. Psihosemantika : uchebnik i praktikum dlja bakalavriata i magistratury. Moscow: Jurajt, 2019. 318 p. (In Russ.).
  18. Smirnov S.D. Psihologija obraza: problema aktivnosti psihicheskogo otrazhenija. Moscow: MGU, 1985. 231 p. (In Russ.).
  19. Fasmer M. Jetimologicheskij slovar’ russkogo jazyka. V 4 t. T. 3. M.: AST, 2009. p. 402. (In Russ.).
  20. Chernyshevskij N.G. Izbrannye filosofskie sochinenija: V 2 t. T. 1. M.: Gospolitizdat, 1950. p. 575. (In Russ.).
  21. ru.wikipedia.org

Information About the Authors

Mikhail V. Tarasov, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Social, General and Clinical Psychology, Russian State Social University, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4817-3480, e-mail: mihael-tarasov@yandex.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 768
Previous month: 21
Current month: 2

Downloads

Total: 436
Previous month: 6
Current month: 1