Engagement in Work and Well-Being in a Clinic of Severe Somatic Diseases: the Role of Personal Features in Clinicians and Laboratory Employees

The contemporary stage of the organizational psychology development is characterized by the interest in differentiating different states at the workplace and in searching for the personal and organizational resources that contribute to a greater engagement in work and prevent the risk of the emotional burnout, the dependence upon work, the disbalance between work and life, etc. The present study aims at detecting personal predictors of ill-health in doctors at the workplace who personally work with patients with severe somatic diseases, and laboratory staff doctors who work with the same patients without any constant personal contact. 180 doctors working with patients with severe somatic diseases (94 clinicians and 86 laboratory employees) filled out the life satisfaction scale, the Utrecht work engagement scale, the emotional exhaustion subscale of the burnout scale, the Dutch scales of job boredom and work addiction, the big five personality test (the second version) and the Millon clinical multiaxial inventory (the third version). According to the results, the differences between the clinicians in the direct contact with patients and the laboratory employees are about a higher level of workaholism in the former, especially in fresh clinicians. That can be explained by both personal and organizational potentials that contribute to coping with stress in this sample. The personal features of the clinicians correspond to their professional choice and development including the propensity for a positive self-presentation, dominance, and the importance of attention and appreciation. The pedantry and thoroughness characteristic of the laboratory employees can contribute to their professional success, while the avoidant personal pattern and self-defense pattern are consistent with their preference for a laboratory work. The data are in favour of the functional opposite of workaholism and boredom, the former with a higher level of empathy and pedantry, and the latter — with that of a lower level. In the both groups, a depressive pattern of personality is associated with a greater boredom at the workplace, the emotional exhaustion and the general dissatisfaction with life; moreover, the risk of the emotional exhaustion is higher in case of unstable emotions and a low dynamism. Thus, a high level of workaholism in the group of the clinicians indicates the importance of the prevention of the dependence on work in the employees who directly contact patients with severe somatic diseases, especially in fresh clinicians with a high level of dominance, empathy and pedantry. In other words, it is important to those who are usually successful at work and do not seek any psychological help) as well as those who are prone to an avoidant or dependent pattern of personality which also leads to the work-life disbalance.

1. Bek A., Rash A., Shaw B., Emeri G. Cognitivnaya terapiya depressiyi [The Cognitive Therapy of Depression]. Saint-Petersburg, 2003. (in Russ.).
2. Bek A., Frimen A. Cognitivnaya psikhoterapiya rasstroystv lichnosti [The Cognitive psychotherapy of personality disorders]. Saint-Petersburg, 2002. (in Russ.).
3. Vlakh N.I. Osobennosti sindroma emotsionalnogo vygoraniya u predstaviteley meditsinskikh professiy [Features of the burnout syndrome in the representatives of medical professions]. Vestnik YuUrGU. Seriya Psikhologiya=The Southern-Ural State University Bulletin. The Psychology Series. 2017. Vol. 10. No. 1, pp. 5—11. doi:10.14529/psy170101 (in Russ.).
4. Vodopianova N.E., Starchenkova E.S. Sindrom vygoraniya: diaagnostika i profilaktika [The Burnout Syndrome: Diagnosis and Prevention: the 2nd ed]. Saint-Petersburg: Peter, 2008. (in Russ.).
5. Zhorina Ya.Yu. Aprobatsiya klinicheskogo mnogokoponentnogo oprosnika T. Millona pri psikhicheskikh rasstroystvakh [Testing T. Millon’s clinical multicomponent questionnaire for mental disorders]. Graduation work. Moscow, 2017. (in Russ.).
6. Ivanova T.Yu., Rasskazova E.I. Sotsialno-demographichekiye i organizatsionnye faktory udovletvorennosti trudom [Socio-demographic and organizational factors of job satisfaction]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal=Psychological Journal, 2013, no. 34 (6), pp. 59—71. (in Russ.).
7. Kitaev-Smyk L.A. Psikhologiya stressa [The Psychology of Stress]. Moscow, 1983. (in Russ.).
8. Kutuzova D.A. Organizatsiya deyatelnosti i stil samoreguliatsii kak faktory professionalnogo vygoranoya pedagoga-psikhologa [The Organization of Activity and Style of Self-regulation as Factors of the Professional Burnout of a Teacher-Psychologist]. Graduation work. Moscow, 2006. (in Russ.).
9. Leonova A.B., Kuznezova A.S. Psikhologicheskiye tekhnologii upravleniya sostoyaniem cheloveka [Psychological Techniques of the Control of the Human State]. Moscow, 2013. (in Russ.).
10. Lovakov A.V. Psikhometricheskiy analiz russkoyazychnoy versii Gollandskoy shkaly trudovoy zavisimosti (DUWAS) [The psychometric analysis of the Russian-language version of the Dutch school of the labour dependence] [Electronic resourse]. Organizatsionnaya psikhologiya=Organizational Psychology, 2016. Vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 22—37. (in Russ.).
11. Mendelevich V.D. Klinicheskaya i meditsinskaya psikhologiya [Clinical and Medical Psychology]. Moscow, 2008. (in Russ.).
12. Mospan A.N., Osin E.N., Ivanova T.Yu., Rasskazova E.I., Bobrov V.V. Balans raboty i lichnoy zhizni u sotrudnikov rossoyskogo proizvodstvennogo predpriyatiya [The balance of the work and personal life in the employees of the Russian enterprise] [Electronic resourse] // Organizatsionnaya psikhologiya=Organizational Psychology, 2016, no. 2, pp. 8—29. Available at: https://orgpsyjournal.hse.ru/data/2016/08/23/1116578057/ OrgPsy_2016_2_1(Mospan_et_al)8—29.pdf (Accessed 12.09.2020). (in Russ.).
13. Morosanova V.I., Fomina T.G. Differentsialno-reguliatornye osnovy pedagogicheskogo vzaimodeystviya uchitelia [The differential and regulatory basis of the teacher interaction]. Psychological Science and Education, 2012, no. 2, pp. 94—102. (in Russ.).
14. Osin E.N., Leontiev D.A. Aprobatsiya russkoyazychnykh versiy dvukh shkal ekspress-otsenki subjektivnogo blogopoluchiya [The testing of the Russian-language versions of the two scales of the express assessments of the subjective well-being]. Materialy III Vserossiyskogo sotsiologicheskogo kongressa=Proceedings of the 3rd All- Russian sociological Congress. Moscow, 2008 (ISBN 978-6-89697-157-3). (in Russ.).
15. Osin E.N., Rasskazova E.I., Neyaskina Yu.Yu., Dorfman L.Ya., Aleksandrova L.A. Operatsionalizatsiya piatifaktornoy modeli lichnostnykh chert na rossiyskoy vyborke [The operationalization of the five-factor model of personality traits in the Russian sample]. Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika=Psychological Diagnosis, 2015, no. 3, pp. 80—104. (in Russ.).
16. Petri A.N. Osobennosti emotsionalnogo vygoraniya meditsinskikh rabotnikov [Features of emotional burnout of medical workers]. Akmeologiya=Acmeology, 2017, no. 1, pp, 129—134. (in Russ.).
17. Bakker A. B. & Demerouti E. Job demands—resources theory. In Chen P.Y. & C. Cooper L. (eds.). Work and Wellbeing: A complete reference guide, Chichester (37—64). UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014. doi:10.1002/9781118539415.wbwell019
18. Bakker A.B., Demerouti E., de Boer E. & Schaufeli W. Job demands and job resources as predictors of absence duration and frequency. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2003. Vol. 62, pp. 341—356. doi:10.1016/ S0001-8791(02)00030-1
19. Bakker A.B., Xanthopoulou D., Demerouti E., Shaufeli W. The role of personal resources in the Job Demands-Resources Model. International Journal of Stress Management, 2007. Vol. 14 (2), pp. 121—141. doi:10.1037/1072-5245.14.2.121
20. Baumeister R.F., Schmeichel B.J., Vohs K.D. Self-Regulation and executive function: The Self as controlling agent. In Kruglanski A.W., Higgins E.T. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press, 2007. Pp. 516—539.
21. Caprara G.V., Barbaranelli C., Borgogni L., Perugini M. The “Big Five Questionnaire”: A new questionnaire to assess the five factor model // Personality and Individual Differences. 1993.Vol. 15(3). Pp. 281—288. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(93)90218-R
22. Diener E., Emmons R.A., Larsen R.J., Griffin S. The Satisfaction With Life Scale // Journal of Personality Assessment. 1985. Vol. 49. Pp. 71—75. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
23. Garrosa E., Moreno-Jimez B., Rodriguez-Munoz A., Rodriguez-Garvajal R. Role of stress and personal resources in nursing: A cross-sectional study of burnout and engagement // International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2011. Vol. 48. Pp. 479—489. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.08.004
24. Grant S., Langan-Fox J., Anglim J. The big five traits as predictors of subjective and psychological well-being // Psychological Reports. 2009. Vol. 105(1). Pp. 205—231. doi:10.2466/PR0.105.1.205-231
25. Hobfoll S. Conservation of resources theory: its implication for stress, health, and resilience. In Folkman S. (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Stress, Health, and Coping. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
26. Hobfoll S. E. & Shirom A. Stress and burnout in work organizations. In Golembiewski R.T. (Eds.). Handbook of Organization Behavior. New York: Dekker, 1993. Pp. 41—61.
27. Jagielski С., Tucker D., Dalton S., Mrug S. Personality as a predictor of well-being in a randomized trial of a mindfulness-based stress reduction of Danish women with breast cancer //Journal of Psychosocial Oncology. 2020. Vol. 38 (1). Pp. 4—19. doi:10.1080/07347332.2019.1626524
28. Judge T.A., Bono J.E. Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis // Journal of Applied Psychology. 2001. Vol. 86 (1). Pp. 80—92. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.86.1.80
29. Okun M.A. & George L.K. Physician- and self-ratings of health, neuroticism, and subjective wellbeing among men and women // Personality and Individual Differences. 1984. Vol. 5. Pp. 533—539. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(84)90027-8
30. Kalimo R., Pahkin, K. Mutanen, P., Toppinen-Tanner S. Staying well or burning out at work: work characteristics and personal resources as long term predictors // Work & Stress. 2003. Vol. 17 ( 2). Pp. 109— 122. doi:10.1080/0267837031000149919
31. Kassam A., Horton J., Shoimer I., Patten S. Predictors of Well-Being in Resident Physicians: A Descriptive and Psychometric Study // Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 2015. Vol. 7 (1). Pp. 70—74. doi:10.4300/ JGME-D-14-00022.1
32. Lewis S., Gambles R, Rapoport R. The constraints of a «work—life balance» approach: an international perspective // International Journal of Human Resource, 20071. Vol. 8 (3). Pp. 360—373. doi:10.1080/09585190601165577
33. Maddi S.R. Relevance of hardiness assessment and training to the military context // Military Psychology. 2007. Vol. 19 (1). Pp. 61—70.
34. Maslach C., Schaufeli W.B., Leiter M.P. Job burnout // Annual Review of Psychology. 2001. Vol. 52. Pp. 397—422. Doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397
35. McDougall L., Drummond P.D. Personal Resources Moderate the Relationship Between Work Stress and Psychological Strain of Submariners // Military Psychology. 2010. Vol. 22. Pp. 385—398. doi:10.1080/089 95605.2010.513231
36. Millon T., Davis R., Grossman S. & Millon C. MCMI—III: Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III Manual: 4th edition. Minneapolis, MN: NCS, Inc., 2009.
37. Nelson D.L. & Simmons B.L. (). Health psychology and work stress: A more positive approach. In Quick J.C. & Tetrick L.E. (Eds.). Handbook of Occupational Health Psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2003. Pp. 97—119.
38. Pérez-Fuentes M., Molero Jurado M., Martos Martínez Á. & Gázquez Linares J.J. Burnout and Engagement: Personality Profiles in Nursing Professionals // Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2019. Vol. 8 (3). P. 286. doi:10.3390/jcm8030286
39. Rantanen J. Work-family interface and psychological well-being: a personality and longitudinal perspective: Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research 346. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylä University Printing House, 2008. 86 p.
40. Reijseger G., Schaufeli W.B., Peeters M.C.W., Taris T.W., van Beek I. & Ouweneel E. Watching the paint dry at work: psychometric examination of the Dutch Boredom Scale // Anxiety, Stress & Coping: An International Journal. 2013. Vol. 26 (5). Pp. 508—525. doi:10.1080/10615806.2012.720676
41. Schaufeli W.B. & Bakker A.B. Test Manual for the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Unpublished manuscript. Utrecht University, 2003. Available at: http://www.schaufeli.com
42. Schaufeli W.B., Bakker A.B., Salanova M. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: a cross-national study // Education and Psychological Measurement. 2006. Vol. 66 (4). Pp. 701—716. doi:10.1177/0013164405282471
43. Schaufeli W.B., Leiter M.P., Maslach C. & Jackson S.E. Maslach Burnout Inventory—General Survey. In Maslach C., Jackson S.E. & Leiter M.P. (Eds.). The Maslach Burnout Inventory—Test manual (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1996.
44. Schaufeli W.B. & Salanova M. Burnout, boredom and engagement at the workplace. In Peeters M., de Jonge J. & Taris T. (Eds.). People at work: An Introduction to Contemporary Work Psychology. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014. Pp. 293—320.
45. Shimazu A., Schaufeli W.B., Kamiyama K. & Kawakami N. Workaholism vs. Work Engagement: the Two Different Predictors of Future Well-being and Performance // International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2015. Vol. 22 (1). Pp. 18—23. doi:10.1007/s12529-014-9410-x
46. Tawfik D.S., Profit J., Webber S. et al. Organizational factors affecting physician well-being // Current Treatment Options in Pediatrics. 2019. Vol. 5. Pp. 11—25. doi:10.1007/s40746-019-00147-6
47. Young H.R., Glerum D.R., Wang W, Joseph D.L. Who are the most engaged at work? A meta-analysis of personality and employee engagement // Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2018. Vol 39. Pp. 1330— 1346. doi:10.1002/job.2303
48. Van Bogaert P., Peremans L., van Heusden D., Verspuy M., Kureckova V., van de Cruys Z. & Franck E. Predictors of burnout, work engagement and nurse reported job outcomes and quality of care: a mixed method study // BMC Nursing. 2017. Vol. 16 (5). doi:10.1186/s12912-016-0200-4